Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Note that we need to consider xlators on brick stack too. I've added maintainers/peers of xlators on brick stack. Please explicitly ack/nack whether this patch affects your component. For reference, following are the xlators loaded in brick stack storage/posix features/trash

[Gluster-devel] gfproxy

Hi, This mail is regarding the gfproxy feature, please go through the same and let us know your thoughts. About the gfproxy feature: --- As per the current architecture of Gluster, the client is more intelligent and has all the clustering logic. This

Re: [Gluster-devel] Brick count limit in a volume

Hi, I think this is the line limiting brick count: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/c136024613c697fec87aaff3a070862b92c57977/cli/src/cli-cmd-parser.c#L84 Can gluster-devs increase this limit? Should I open a github issue? On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Serkan Çoban

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Brick count limit in a volume

This is the command line output: Total brick list is larger than a request. Can take (brick_count ) Usage: volume create [stripe ] [replica ] I am testing if a big single volume will work for us. Now I am continuing testing with three volumes each 13PB...

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2017-08-23-5b14c11d (master branch)

GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-08-23-5b14c11d ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Brick count limit in a volume

In your case for 5500 bricks cli is failing the command saying "Total brick list is larger than a request. Can take (brick_count )". RCA.. gluster cli while parsing the command takes the wordcount and based on that it compares the statically initialized size as you have point out in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Thanks Pranith and Ashish for your inputs. - Original Message - > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > To: "Ashish Pandey" > Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Xavier Hernandez" > , "Gluster Devel" >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Raghavendra, As Ashish mentioned, there aren't any known problems if upper xlators don't send lookups in EC at the moment. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Ashish Pandey wrote: > Raghvendra, > > I have provided my comment on this patch. > I think EC will not have any