Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.12.3 : Scheduled for the 10th of November

2017-11-09 Thread Jiffin Tony Thottan
Hi, I am planning to do 3.12.3 release today 10:00 pm IST (4:30 pm GMT). Following bugs is removed from tracker list Bug 1501235 - [SNAPSHOT] Unable to mount a snapshot on client -- based on discussion on gerrit, it can be target for 3.13 instead of the 3.12.x release Bug 1507006 -

Re: [Gluster-devel] RFC: FUSE kernel features to be adopted by GlusterFS

2017-11-09 Thread Jeff Darcy
> So - nothing inherent to libfuse and nothing that would be relevant as > of today. > > But then, let me put it like this: what reason could we have to *not* go > with xglfs in 4.0? It's true that the deliverables are present in libfuse > and > libgfapi and it's just a thin glue. As such it

Re: [Gluster-devel] RFC: FUSE kernel features to be adopted by GlusterFS

2017-11-09 Thread Csaba Henk
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:04:48AM +0100, Csaba Henk wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > here is an overview of recent additions to the > > FUSE protocol that are not yet supported by > > the GlusterFS FUSE implementation and >

Re: [Gluster-devel] reflink support for glusterfs and gluster-block using it for taking snapshots

2017-11-09 Thread Niels de Vos
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 05:59:32PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:43:17AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > hi, > > > I just created a github issue for reflink support

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2017-11-09-9eea2630 (master branch)

2017-11-09 Thread staticanalysis
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-11-09-9eea2630 ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] RFC: FUSE kernel features to be adopted by GlusterFS

2017-11-09 Thread Niels de Vos
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:04:48AM +0100, Csaba Henk wrote: > Hello list, > > here is an overview of recent additions to the > FUSE protocol that are not yet supported by > the GlusterFS FUSE implementation and > what sh/could be done about them. > >

[Gluster-devel] RFC: FUSE kernel features to be adopted by GlusterFS

2017-11-09 Thread Csaba Henk
Hello list, here is an overview of recent additions to the FUSE protocol that are not yet supported by the GlusterFS FUSE implementation and what sh/could be done about them. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGxMC7Db7Rdd19VXlBe0tI-frdjICJdzxx4EsntuPDU/edit Comments on the doc or in this

Re: [Gluster-devel] master broken.

2017-11-09 Thread Hari Gowtham
Thanks. It works now. Sorry for the late response. On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Please pull in the latest changes. It’s fixed now. > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 at 23:41, Hari Gowtham wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have been trying to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Tie-breaker logic for blocking inodelks/entrylks

2017-11-09 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
I got a +1 from Ashish and Xavi for the idea. I will wait for people from other time zones to comment on the same and will start implementing the solution tomorrow morning IST. I am kind of in a hurry to get this done, preferably by end of this week. Thanks in advance. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at

[Gluster-devel] Tie-breaker logic for blocking inodelks/entrylks

2017-11-09 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
This github issue talks about the logic for implementing tie-breaker logic for blocking inodelks/entrylks. Your comments are welcome on the issue. -- Pranith ___ Gluster-devel mailing list