Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-packaging] Release 4.0: Making it happen! (GlusterD2)

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > comments inline > > On 01/10/2018 02:08 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > Hi, (GD2 team, packaging team, please read) > > Here are some things we need to settle so that we can ship/release GD2 > along with Gluster 4.0

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-packaging] Release 4.0: Making it happen! (GlusterD2)

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:38 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, (GD2 team, packaging team, please read) > > Here are some things we need to settle so that we can ship/release GD2 > along with Gluster 4.0 release (considering this is a separate > repository as of now). > > 1)

Re: [Gluster-devel] Integration of GPU with glusterfs

bit-rot is another feature that consumes much CPU to calculate the file content hash On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Ashish Pandey wrote: > Hi, > > We have been thinking of exploiting GPU capabilities to enhance > performance of glusterfs. We would like to know others

[Gluster-devel] Integration of GPU with glusterfs

Hi, We have been thinking of exploiting GPU capabilities to enhance performance of glusterfs. We would like to know others thoughts on this. In EC, we have been doing CPU intensive computations to encode and decode data before writing and reading. This requires a lot of CPU cycles and we have

[Gluster-devel] posix_disk_space_check and internal clients

Hi, DISK_SPACE_CHECK_AND_GOTO in posix.h allows all calls from internal clients to bypass the check. But in edge cases, internal clients could write to files and fill up the brick. Would it be better to not allow some fops like write in this case for internal clients as well? Regards, Nithya

[Gluster-devel] Release 3.12.5: Scheduled for the 12th of January

Hi, It's time to prepare the 3.12.5 release, which falls on the 10th of each month, and hence would be 12-01-2018 this time around. This mail is to call out the following, 1) Are there any pending *blocker* bugs that need to be tracked for 3.12.5? If so mark them against the provided tracker

[Gluster-devel] Please file a bug if you take a machine offline

Hello folks, If you take a machine offline, please file a bug so that the machine can be debugged and return to the pool. -- nigelb ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Recent regression failures

Hello folks, We may have been a little too quick to blame Meltdown on the Jenkins failures yesterday. In any case, we've open a ticket with our provider and they're looking into the failures. I've looked at the last 90 failures to get a comprehensive number on the failures. Total Jobs: 90

Re: [Gluster-devel] a link issue maybe introduced in a bug fix " Don't let NFS cache stat after writes"

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 6:35 AM, Lian, George (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) < george.l...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote: > Hi, > > >>> In which protocol are you seeing this issue? Fuse/NFS/SMB? > > It is fuse, within mountpoint by “mount -t glusterfs …“ command. > Could you let me know the test you did so that

Re: [Gluster-devel] a link issue maybe introduced in a bug fix " Don't let NFS cache stat after writes"

+csaba for fuse. +poornima, if the issue turns out to be an issue in md-cache caching. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Lian, George (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) < > george.l...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote: > >> Hi,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Exact purpose of network.ping-timeout

+gluster-devel - Original Message - > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" > To: "Omar Kohl" > Cc: gluster-us...@gluster.org > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:47:31 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Exact purpose of network.ping-timeout > > >

[Gluster-devel] Release 4.0: Making it happen! (Protocol changes and wireshark)

Hi, As we are introducing a new protocol version, the existing gluster wireshark plugin [1] needs to be updated. Further this needs to get released to wireshark users in some fashion, which looks like a need to follow wireshark roadmap [2] (not sure if this can be part of a maintenance release,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-packaging] Release 4.0: Making it happen! (GlusterD2)

comments inline On 01/10/2018 02:08 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, (GD2 team, packaging team, please read) Here are some things we > need to settle so that we can ship/release GD2 along with Gluster 4.0 > release (considering this is a separate repository as of now). 1) > Generating release

[Gluster-devel] Release 4.0: Making it happen! (GlusterD2)

Hi, (GD2 team, packaging team, please read) Here are some things we need to settle so that we can ship/release GD2 along with Gluster 4.0 release (considering this is a separate repository as of now). 1) Generating release package (read as RPM for now) to go with Gluster 4.0 release Proposal:

[Gluster-devel] Release 4.0: Making it happen!

Hi, 4.0 branching date is slated on the 16th of Jan 2018 and release is slated for the end of Feb (28th), 2018. We are at the phase when we need to ensure our release scope is correct and *must* release features are landing. Towards this we need the following information for all contributors.

[Gluster-devel] Maintainer Meeting minutes - Jan 10th, 2018

The first maintainers' meeting of the year 2018 went well, and there were discussion and participation till the last minute. I hope more maintainers join regularly to this meeting, and make it easier to take decisions. BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download:

[Gluster-devel] Side effect of the metldown fix for regression

Hi, so it seems that the meltdown fix did slowdown regression testing, as told to me by Nigel (after Nithya pointed this looked like timing issue).  After a quick discussion on irc, we suspect this might be the lack of pcid for the rackspace hosts. So the good news is that we have a fix:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Simulating some kind of "virtual file"

Check the files in $mountpoint/.meta/ directory. These are all virtual. And meta xlator gives a very good idea about how to handle virtual files (and directories). -Amar On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Xavi Hernandez wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:42 PM,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Simulating some kind of "virtual file"

Hi David, On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:42 PM, David Spisla wrote: > > *[David Spisla] I tried this:* > > *char *new_path = malloc(1+len_path-5);* > > *memcpy(new_path, loc->path, len_path-5);* > > *new_path[strlen(new_path)] = '\0';* > > *loc->name = new_path + (len_path

Re: [Gluster-devel] a link issue maybe introduced in a bug fix " Don't let NFS cache stat after writes"

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Lian, George (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) < george.l...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote: > Hi, Pranith Kumar, > > > > I has create a bug on Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ > show_bug.cgi?id=1531457 > > After my investigation for this link issue, I suppose your changes on >