On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 11:29 PM Soumya Koduri wrote:
>
>
> On 3/29/19 11:55 PM, Xavi Hernandez wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > there is one potential problem with posix locks when used in a
> > replicated or dispersed volume.
> >
> > Some background:
> >
> > Posix locks allow any process to lock a
[...truncated 6 lines...]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1688226 / core: Brick Still Died After Restart
Glusterd & Glusterfsd Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1691833 / core: Client sends 128KByte network
packet for 0 length file copy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1685023 / core: FD processes for
On 3/29/19 11:55 PM, Xavi Hernandez wrote:
Hi all,
there is one potential problem with posix locks when used in a
replicated or dispersed volume.
Some background:
Posix locks allow any process to lock a region of a file multiple times,
but a single unlock on a given region will release
