On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:53 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> My take is, lets disable sdfs for 6.1 (we also have issues with its
> performance anyways). We will fix it properly by 6.2 or 7.0. Continue with
> marking sdfs-sanity.t tests as bad in that case.
>
It is
Hi,
In my recent test, I found that there are very severe glusterfsd memory leak
when enable socket ssl option.
If I monitor glusterfsd process RSS with command: pidstat -r -p 1
And at the same tme, execute command: gluster v heal info, i find that
the RSS keep increasing until system Out of
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:33 AM Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:27 PM Atin Mukherjee
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:19 PM Atin Mukherjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:26 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:19 PM Atin Mukherjee
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Status: Tagging pending
>>>
>>> Waiting on patches:
>>> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:19 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan
> wrote:
>
>> Status: Tagging pending
>>
>> Waiting on patches:
>> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client graph logic
>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22579
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan
wrote:
> Status: Tagging pending
>
> Waiting on patches:
> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client graph logic
> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22579
The regression doesn't pass for the mainline patch. I believe
Status: Tagging pending
Waiting on patches:
(Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client graph logic
https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22579
Following patches will not be taken in if CentOS regression does not
pass by tomorrow morning Eastern TZ,
(Pranith/KingLongMee) -
