Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Weekly Untriaged Bugs

2019-04-28 Thread Deepshikha Khandelwal
This list also captures the BZs which are in NEW state. The search description goes like this: - *Status:* NEW - *Product:* GlusterFS - *Changed:* (is greater than or equal to) -4w - *Creation date:* (changed after) -4w - *Keywords:* (does not contain the string) Triaged On Sun,

Re: [Gluster-devel] questions on callstubs and "link-count" in index translator

2019-04-28 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:55 PM Junsong Li wrote: > Hello list, > > > > I have a couple of questions on index translator implementation. > >- Why does gluster need callstub and a different worker queue (and >thread) to process those call stubs? Is it just to lower the priority of >

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Untriaged Bugs

2019-04-28 Thread jenkins
[...truncated 6 lines...] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1699023 / core: Brick is not able to detach successfully in brick_mux environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1702316 / core: Cannot upgrade 5.x volume to 6.1 because of unused 'crypt' and 'bd' xlators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1695416 /

Re: [Gluster-devel] Weekly Untriaged Bugs

2019-04-28 Thread Atin Mukherjee
While I understand this report captured bugs filed since last 1 week and do not have ‘Triaged’ keyword, does it make better sense to exclude bugs which aren’t in NEW state? I believe the intention of this report is to check what all bugs haven’t been looked at by maintainers/developers yet. BZs