Any pointer please??
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:20 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Could you please let me know the reason of getting below error in mount
> logs:
>
> [2021-02-02 20:20:11.918444] I [MSGID: 139001]
> [posix-acl.c:263:posix_acl_log_permit_denied]
:4294967295)*
[Permission denied]*
[2021-02-02 20:20:11.918519] W [fuse-bridge.c:1583:fuse_setattr_cbk]
0-glusterfs-fuse: 59475: SETATTR() /java/CXC1721558_R107B01.jar => -1
*(Permission denied)*
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
---
Community Meeting Calendar:
Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tues
hya
>
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 12:09, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nithya,
>>
>> Here is the Setup details and test which we are doing as below:
>>
>>
>> One client, two gluster Server.
>> The client is writing and deleting o
Hi Team,
Please respond on the issue which I raised.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:46 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Anyone please reply
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019, 10:49 ABHISHEK PALIWAL
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I upload some valgri
Anyone please reply
On Thu, May 16, 2019, 10:49 ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I upload some valgrind logs from my gluster 5.4 setup. This is writing to
> the volume every 15 minutes. I stopped glusterd and then copy away the
> logs. The test was running for some
bytes in 3 blocks
==2737== possibly lost: 2,374,971 bytes in 524 blocks
==2737== still reachable: 53,277 bytes in 201 blocks
==2737== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
<>
___
Community Meeting Calendar:
APAC Schedule -
Eve
Hi,
As per gluster community seems the latest version is 5.5. Could any one
tell me what would be the EOL date for version 5.5? is it after 12 month of
release date or what?
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel
Suryanarayan <
atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> We recommend to use 'tirpc' in the later releases. use '--with-tirpc'
> while running ./configure
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:55 AM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Amar,
>>
>> this problem seems to be conf
Hi Amar,
this problem seems to be configuration issue due to librpc.
Could you please let me know what should be configuration I need to use?
Regards,
Abhishek
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:42 AM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> logs for libgfrpc.so
>
> pabhishe@arn-build3$ldd
> ./5.4
at 10:02 AM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Here are the logs:
>
>
> pabhishe@arn-build3$ldd
> ./5.4-r0/sysroot-destdir/usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.*
> ./5.4-r0/sysroot-destdir/usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0:
> not a dynamic executable
> ./5.4-r0/sysroot-destdir/usr/lib
Hi Amar,
did you get time to check the logs?
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:58 AM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Hi Amar,
>
> Below are the requested logs
>
> pabhishe@arn-build3$ldd ./sysroot-destdir/usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so
> not a dynamic executable
>
>
t; wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Can you check and get back to us?
>
> ```
> bash# ldd /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so
> bash# ldd /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so
>
> ```
>
> Also considering you have the core, can you do `(gdb) thr apply all bt
> full` and pass it on?
>
> Than
Hi Team,
COuld you please provide some pointer to debug it further.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:19 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am using Glusterfs 5.4, where after setting the gluster mount point when
> trying to access it, glusterfsd is getting crash
=) at
xdr_ref.c:84
#33 0x3fff95b6fe04 in __GI_xdr_pointer (xdrs=0x3fff90391d20,
objpp=0x3fff7c1312a0, obj_size=,
xdr_obj=@0x3fff95c6a4b0: 0x3fff95c4ddc0 <.xdr_gfx_dirplist>) at
xdr_ref.c:135
Frames are getting repeated, could any one please me.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
o run glusterd in gdb, you need start glusterd in gdb (i.e. gdb
> glusterd, and then give the command "run -N"). when you see a segmentation
> fault, please capture the backtrace and paste it here.
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:07 AM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
> wrote:
>
sport/socket.so(+0xc09c)[0x3fff9d51709c]
/usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(+0xb84bc)[0x3fffa13214bc]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xbb30)[0x3fffa11bdb30]
/lib64/libc.so.6(clone-0x9e964)[0x3fffa110817c]
-
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Could you please help me, what actually the problem?
--
R
Hi,
Could you please update on this and also let us know what is GlusterD2 (as
it is under development in 5.0 release), so it is ok to uplift to 5.0?
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:47 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently we are using Glusterfs 3.7.6 and
Hi,
Currently we are using Glusterfs 3.7.6 and thinking to switch on Glusterfs
4.1 or 5.0, when I see there are too much code changes between these
version, could you please let us know, is there any compatibility issue
when we uplift any of the new mentioned version?
Regards
Abhishek
at early start of gluster ?
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:27 PM Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:17 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
> wrote:
>
>> I don't have the step to reproduce, but its a race condition where it
>> seems clea
Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 5:16 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pranith,
>>
>> As we know this problem is getting triggered at startup of the glusterd
>> process when it received the SIGTERM.
>>
>> I think there is a pr
51160) at
pthread_create.c:462
#7 0x3fff7a4170fc in .__clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/clone.S:96
(gdb)
(gdb)
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 3:06 PM Sanju Rakonde wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Can you please share the output of "t a a bt" with us?
>
>
ng on this issue.*
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
this piece of change
> touches upon the core store utils code path which need to be thought out
> really well with all the corner cases before pushing the commit.
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:32 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Team
/
Currently the status is "Abandoned".
Could you please let me know what is our plan to release this patch? Please
respond as it is important for us.
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluste
I hope these logs were sufficient... please let me know if you require more
logs.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:26 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Atin,
>
> Please find the backtrace and logs files attached here.
>
> Also, below are the BT from core
Any suggestion
On Dec 6, 2017 11:51, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> We are getting the crash in glusterd after start of it. When I tried to
> debug in brick logs we are getting below errors:
>
> [2017-12-01
oint light on this area. Also is
there any side effect of changing these permissions apart from other user
can access these.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:52 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Any suggestion would be appreciated...
>
> On Sep 18, 2017
LEY <kkeit...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 09:22 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
> > Any suggestion would be appreciated...
> >
> > On Sep 18, 2017 15:05, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:abhishpali...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> &
Any suggestion would be appreciated...
On Sep 18, 2017 15:05, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any quick suggestion.?
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>&g
Any quick suggestion.?
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> As you can see permission for the glusterfs logs in /var/log/glusterfs is
> 600.
>
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 140 Jan 1 00:00 ..
> *-rw---
root root 2102 Jan 3 20:21 etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log*
Due to that non-root user is not able to access these logs files, could you
please let me know how can I change these permission. So that non-root user
can also access these log files.
Regards,
Abhishek Paliwal
Do we have ACL support on nfs-ganesha?
On Aug 30, 2017 3:08 PM, "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:52:59PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
> > What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this.
>
> Gluster/NFS (or gNFS) is the NFS-s
What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:03:02PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > I have an query regarding the usage of ACL on gluster
Is it possible to suggest something here?
On Aug 17, 2017 12:03 PM, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I have an query regarding the usage of ACL on gluster volume. I have
> noticed that when we use normal gluster volume (without ACL)
know is this expected or we can do some other
configuration to reduce this type of overhead on gluster volume with ACLs.
For more clarification we are using kernel NFS for exporting the gluster
volume.
Please let me know if you require more information.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
Could you please response?
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 5:55 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Whenever I am performing the IO operation on gluster volume, the loads is
> getting increase on CPU which reaches upto 70-80 sometimes.
>
> w
u, Jun 01, 2017 at 01:03:25PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
> > Hi Niels,
> >
> > No problem we wil try to backport that patch on 3.7.6.
> >
> > Could you please let me know in which release Gluster community is going
> to
> > provide this patch and date of tha
Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:08:06PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
> > We are using 3.7.6 and on link https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279
> status
> > is "can't merge"
>
> Note that 3.7.x will not get any updates anymore. We currently maintain
> version 3.8.x, 3.10.x an
So is there any one working on it to fix this issue either by this patch or
some other way? if yes then please provide the time plan.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:08 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhis
We are using 3.7.6 and on link https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279 status
is "can't merge"
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This is already part of 3.11.0 release?
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
Hi Atin,
Could you please let us know any time plan for deliver of this patch.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Actually it is very risky if it will reproduce in production thats is why
> I said it is on high prio
, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Kotresh.
>
> Let me discuss in my team and will let you know.
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <
> khire...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ab
Actually it is very risky if it will reproduce in production thats is why I
said it is on high priority as want to resolve it before production.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:10 PM, ABHISHEK PALI
Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:37 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> + Muthu-vingeshwaran
>>
>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
>> abhishpali...@gmail.com>
+ Muthu-vingeshwaran
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Atin/Team,
>
> We are using gluster-3.7.6 with setup of two brick and while restart of
> system I have seen that the glusterd daemon is getting failed from start.
is the plan of community to provide the solution of
this problem and in which version.
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
s minimal
> conflicts. I can help you out with that.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Kotresh H R
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
> > To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khire...@redhat.com
Hi Kotresh,
Could you please update whether it is possible to get the patch or bakport
this patch on Gluster 3.7.6 version.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:14 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> What is the way to take this patch on Gluster 3.7.6 or
What is the way to take this patch on Gluster 3.7.6 or only way to upgrade
the version?
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:22 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Kotresh,
>
> I have seen the patch available on the link which you shared. It seems we
> don't have so
/, it is made
> optional and is enabled only with bitrot. If bitrot
> is not enabled, then you won't see any setxattr/getxattrs
> related to bitrot.
>
> The fix would be available in 3.11.
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Kotresh H R
>
> - Original Message --
Hi Kotresh,
Could you please update me on this?
Regards,
Abhishek
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> +Kotresh who seems to have worked on the bug you mentioned.
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
If the patch provided in that case will resolve my bug as well then please
provide the patch so that I will backport it on 3.7.6
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I have noticed that there are so many glusterfsd thre
cgi?id=1298258
We are using the gluster-3.7.6 and it seems that the issue is fixed in
3.8.4 version.
Could you please let me know why it showing the number of above logs and
reason behind it as it is not explained in the above bug.
Regards,
Abhishek
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
_
There is no need but it could happen accidentally and I think it should be
protect or should not be permissible.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 at 08:23, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
it is a bug of limitations, please let us know about
this?*
Regards,
Abhishek
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
> abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> yes i
yes it is ext4. but what is the impact of this.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:21 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Means the fs where this bri
Means the fs where this brick has been created?
On Apr 13, 2017 8:19 AM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Is your backend filesystem ext4?
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:29 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>
No,we are not using sharding
On Apr 12, 2017 7:29 PM, "Alessandro Briosi" <a...@metalit.com> wrote:
> Il 12/04/2017 14:16, ABHISHEK PALIWAL ha scritto:
>
> I have did more investigation and find out that brick dir size is
> equivalent to gluster mount point bu
you have to find out if you have anything in .glusterfs which
> should not be. I would have started from the biggest entry I see in
> .glusterfs
> like "154M/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/08"
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"ABHISHEK PALIWAL" &l
hich
> should not be. I would have started from the biggest entry I see in
> .glusterfs
> like "154M/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/08"
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
> *To: *&quo
n your mount point
> (recursively) and then see the number of entries on .glusterfs/
>
>
> ------
> *From: *"ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "gluster-users" <
&g
s not having
> any previous data?
> Find out the total number of files and directories on your mount point
> (recursively) and then see the number of entries on .glusterfs/
>
>
> ------
> *From: *"ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gma
Is there any update ??
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:45 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently experiencing a serious issue w.r.t volume space usage by
> glusterfs.
>
> In the below outputs, we can see that the size of the real data i
s/landfill
#
In which it is clear that all the backup/metadata files created w.r.t
original files in gluster mount point taking to much spaces.
Please let us know the reason of this problem.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Glu
the possibility what is the problem here.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
its really highly appreciable if some one respond on this.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:31 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> is there anyone who can reply on this query?
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
> wr
is there anyone who can reply on this query?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please reply I am waiting for your response.
> On Nov 30, 2016 2:21 PM, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
> wrote
Please reply I am waiting for your response.
On Nov 30, 2016 2:21 PM, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> could you please respond on this issue?
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:56 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>
could you please respond on this issue?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:56 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I have two board setup and on which we have one volume with two brick on
> each board.
>
> When I was checking the cpu load I fo
or to reduce this high load.
I have also collected the volume profile logs but don't know how to
understand or analyze those logs.
I am attaching those logs here.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
Log start: 161129-130518 - 10.67.29.150 - moshell 16.0y -
/home/emamiko/EVO8300/Issues/CPU_highLoad_C1MP
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:00 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
> abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Atin,
>>
>> System is the embedded system and these dates are before the s
Hi Atin,
I will be waiting for your response.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:00 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Atin,
>
> System is the embedded system and these dates are before the system get in
> timer sync.
>
> Yes, I have also seen these two
to
> 5be8603b-18d0-4333-8590-38f918a22857,
> you should have only one entry in the peers folder in board 2500.
> 2. Bring down both glusterd instances
> 3. Bring back one by one
>
> And then restart glusterd to see if the issue persists.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016
Hope you will see in the logs..
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:17 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Atin,
>
> It is not getting wipe off we have changed the configuration path from
> /var/lib/glusterd to /system/glusterd.
>
> So, they will re
he bricks. Are
> the connections fine?
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:20 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
> abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Its an urgent case.
>>
>> Atleast provide your views on this
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:08 AM, ABH
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Could you please see if you are bricks are healthy or not, may be you can
> do a gluster volume status or you can look into the logs. If bricks are not
> running can you please attach the bricks logs in /var/log/gluster/bricks/ .
>
>
> Rafi KC
>
> On 1
Hi,
Its an urgent case.
Atleast provide your views on this
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:08 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We could see that sync is getting failed to sync the GlusterFS bricks due
> to error trace "Transport endpoint is not c
could anyone reply on this.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:08 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We could see that sync is getting failed to sync the GlusterFS bricks due
> to error trace "Transport endpoint is not connected "
>
> [20
mmunity is working on that. May I know is
these message caused any problem in gluster behavior due to some timeout?
Below is the link which I found w.r.t this. May I know when can I expect
the solution for this.
https://access.redhat.com/node/2705301
--
Regard
, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 04:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> As we are seeing many issues in gluster. And we are failing to address
>> most of the gluster issues due to la
that can always be activated.
Please come back on this!
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Please comment your analysis it is very urgent
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:10 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Again I am getting the duplicate peer entries in the peer status command
> while restarting system which causing sync failure
le reason for it
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:58 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting some unwanted errors when created the distributed volume and
> not able to access file from the gluster mount.
>
> Could you please let me know the rea
e attached log for more details.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
gluster.tar
Description: Unix tar archive
Log start: 160928-103437 - 10.220.32.69 - moshell 16.0s - /home/eandmle/tmp/file_permission/gluster_logs.log
STP69> ls /system/glusterd
160928-10:35:49 10.22
n.
So, I just want to know the possible reason behind this problem.
There is no possibility of deletion of glusterd.info file and I think if
this is not present then only gluster will generate new UUID for the peer.
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Glu
ell me the reason behind this failure like when and why
these log occurs.
I have already pushed same query previously but did not get any response.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.glust
i am still facing this issue any suggestion
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:48 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> any hint from the logs..
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:59 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
> abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>&
any hint from the logs..
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:59 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Lindsay Mathieson <
> lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 25 May 2016 at 20:25, ABHISHEK PALIWAL &
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Lindsay Mathieson <
lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 May 2016 at 20:25, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [2016-05-24 12:10:20.091267] E [MSGID: 113039] [posix.c:2570:posix_open]
> > 0-c_glusterfs-posix: o
please reply
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:55 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using replicated volume on board gluster volume mount point is
> working fine but on other board it is mounted as well as file are present
> but it is not disp
s reported?
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:42 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
> <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > What will happen if we format the volume where the bricks of replicate
> > gluster volume's are created and restart the glusterd on both node.
> >
Hi
What will happen if we format the volume where the bricks of replicate
gluster volume's are created and restart the glusterd on both node.
It will work fine or in this case need to remove /var/lib/glusterd
directory as well.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
ne.
>
>
> On 05/04/2016 05:43 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
> > Hi Atin,
> >
> > please reply, is there any configurable time out parameter for brick
> > process to go offline which we can increase?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Abhishek
> >
> > O
Hi Atin,
please reply, is there any configurable time out parameter for brick
process to go offline which we can increase?
Regards,
Abhishek
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:34 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Atin,
>
> Please answer following doubts
Hi Soumya,
Please find attached nfs.log file.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:45 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> HI Soumya,
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> Yes, I am getting following error in /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log file
>
> [20
th respect
> protocol registration failures.
>
> Thanks,
> Soumya
>
> On 05/04/2016 11:15 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
>
>> Hi Niels,
>>
>> Please reply it is really urgent.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Abhishek
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:3
Hi Niels,
Please reply it is really urgent.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:36 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Do you require more logs...
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 4:58 PM, ABHISHEK PA
003 vers 3 prot TCP port 38465
mount.nfs: prog 15, trying vers=3, prot=17
mount.nfs: portmap query retrying: RPC: Program not registered
mount.nfs: prog 15, trying vers=3, prot=6
mount.nfs: trying 128.224.95.140 prog 15 vers 3 prot TCP port 38465
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Niel
224.95.140:/gv0 /tmp/e
setfacl -m u:nobody:r /tmp/e
setfacl: /tmp/e: Remote I/O error
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
