As long as the CLI is still fully available I think it could help some less
experienced users. There are a couple opensource projects for managing
gluster, ceph, etc. Would it make more sense to invest the development
time / resources in the web based GUI or would we want a TUI as well? From
my
WRT performance. I would be happy to kick of daily performance regression
runs on what ever you guys would like. My current daily runs don't take
any more than 6-8 hours, I could fit another 4 hours in there for
upstream. I could also run them on RDMA to help out on some coverage
there. LMK
I run alot of random IO tests with gluster and it has really come a long
way in the 3.7 release. What version are you running on? I have a couple
of suggestions:
-Run on 3.7 if you are not already.
-Run the IOZone test you are running on the back end without gluster to
verify that your HW meets
vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/01/2015 10:23 AM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
Ok I have all my data created and I just started the rebalance. One
thing to not in the client log I see the following spamming:
[root@gqac006 ~]# cat /var/log/glusterfs/gluster-mount-.log | wc -l
394042
[2015-05-01
: Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com
To: Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com
Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 5:18:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design
Thanks Vijay! I forgot to upgrade the kernel(thinp 6.6 perf bug gah)
before
:
I sent a fix http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10478/ but abandoned it
since Susant (CC'ed) has already sent one
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10459/
I think it needs re-submission, but more review-eyes are welcome.
-Ravi
On 05/01/2015 12:18 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
There was a segfault
0x7f2709024f62 in synctask_wrap (old_task=value optimized out) at
syncop.c:375
#12 0x003648c438f0 in ?? () from /lib64/libc-2.12.so
#13 0x in ?? ()
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok I have all my data created and I just started
I liked:
Gluster: Redefine storage.
Gluster: Software-Defined Storage. Redefined
Gluster: RAID G
Gluster: RAISE (redundant array of inexpensive storage equipment)
Gluster: Software {re}defined storage+
And suggested:
Gluster {DS|FS|RAISE|RAIDG}: Software Defined Storage Redefined(some
figured I'd let this run over night.
-b
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sweet! Here is the baseline:
[root@gqas001 ~]# gluster v rebalance testvol status
Node Rebalanced-files size
scanned
-
From: Susant Palai spa...@redhat.com
To: Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com, Nithya Balachandran
nbala...@redhat.com
Cc: Shyamsundar Ranganathan srang...@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:22:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design
This is how it looks
?
Regards,
Nithya
- Original Message -
From: Susant Palai spa...@redhat.com
To: Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com
Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 9:55:07 AM
Subject: Re
Hi Kiran, thanks for the feedback! I already put up a repo on githib:
https://github.com/bennyturns/gluster-bench
On my TODO list is:
-The benchmark is currently RHEL / RHGS(Red Hat Gluster Storage) specific,
I want to make things work with at least non paid RPM distros and Ubuntu.
-Other
To: Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com
Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 9:55:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design
Hi Ben,
Uploaded a new patch here: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9657/. We can
start perf test
I have some rebalance perf regression stuff I have been working on, is
there an RPM with these patches anywhere so that I can try it on my
systems? If not I'll just build from:
git fetch git://review.gluster.org/glusterfs refs/changes/57/9657/8 git
cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD
I will have _at_least_
This is interesting to me, I'd like the chance to run my performance tests
on a cloud provider's systems. We could put together some recommendations
for configuration, tuning, and performance numbers? Also it would be cool
to enhance my setup scripts to work with cloud instances. Sound like
Message -
From: Ben Turner btur...@redhat.com
To: David F. Robinson david.robin...@corvidtec.com
Cc: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com, Xavier
Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.es, Benjamin Turner
bennytu...@gmail.com, gluster-us...@gluster.org, Gluster Devel
gluster-devel
It sounds to me like the files were only copied to one replica, werent
there for the initial for the initial ls which triggered a self heal, and
were there for the last ls because they were healed. Is there any chance
that one of the replicas was down during the rsync? It could be that you
lost
From what I can tell I incorrectly assumed that I was seeing a problem
deleting directories as described in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121347#c4
This is definitely different than Anders is seeing in the duplicate entries
email thread. Should I close my original issue and
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/18/2014 07:57 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
During testing of a 3*4 gluster (from master as of yesterday), I
encountered
two major weirdnesses:
1. A 'rm -rf some_dir' needed several invocations to
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:36 PM, John Mark Walker johnm...@gluster.org
wrote:
Greetings,
One of the things I wanted to do with the forge, was use it as the basis
for creating a software distribution of tools related to GlusterFS.
GlusterFS would remain the centerpiece, and we would add all
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yup,
On Jun 17, 2014 7:45 PM, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote:
On 17/06/2014, at 11:33 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
Here are the tests that failed. Note that n0 is a generated wname,
name255 is a 255
21 matches
Mail list logo
