Re: [Gluster-devel] unsubscribe

Hah, sorry about that. The link in the header suggests that should have worked. On 2/3/23 3:38 PM, Joe Julian wrote: On 2/3/23 3:08 PM, Gluster-jenkins wrote: Test details: RPM Location: Upstream OS Version: Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux 8.4-(Ootpa) Baseline Gluster version: glusterfs-10.1-1

[Gluster-devel] unsubscribe

On 2/3/23 3:08 PM, Gluster-jenkins wrote: Test details: RPM Location: Upstream OS Version: Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux 8.4-(Ootpa) Baseline Gluster version: glusterfs-10.1-1. Current Gluster version: glusterfs-20221209.34ce46c-0.0 Intermediate Gluster version: No intermediate baseline Test type:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Freenode takeover and GlusterFS IRC channels

; >It's all _there_ _now_. If you don't use it you simply _decided_ >against it. >Make that transparent to yourself. >-- >Regards, >Stephan > > > > >On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 14:34:51 -0700 >Joe Julian wrote: > >> Most people already use slack for work and

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Freenode takeover and GlusterFS IRC channels

Most people already use slack for work and most of the projects with high engagement use it, too. While I agree that I wish the open source community would adopt open source tools, the reality is we still use GitHub, Slack, and Zoom for the majority of them. Using the tools that your community

Re: [Gluster-devel] Do we still support the '"GlusterFS 3.3" RPC client?

3.13.0, the last 3.x.0 release, was released on 2017-12-01. Ubuntu supports LTS releases for 7 years, Red Hat, 10 years. I would assume that storage is one of those things that should be expected to work over the life of an enterprise software release cycle which would imply 7-10 years or

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

You can also see diffs between force pushes now. On August 26, 2019 8:06:30 AM PDT, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna Murthy wrote: >On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian >wrote: > >> > Comparing the changes between revisions is something >> that GitHub does not

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

> Comparing the changes between revisions is something that GitHub does not support... It does support that, actually.___ Community Meeting Calendar: APAC Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017

Re: [Gluster-devel] Kluster for Kubernetes (was Announcing Gluster for Container Storage)

On 8/24/18 8:24 AM, Michael Adam wrote: On 2018-08-23 at 13:54 -0700, Joe Julian wrote: Personally, I'd like to see the glusterd service replaced by a k8s native controller (named "kluster"). If you are exclusively interested in gluster for kubernetes storage, this might seem

Re: [Gluster-devel] Announcing Gluster for Container Storage (GCS)

Personally, I'd like to see the glusterd service replaced by a k8s native controller (named "kluster"). I'm hoping to use this vacation I'm currently on to write up a design doc. On August 23, 2018 12:58:03 PM PDT, Michael Adam wrote: >On 2018-07-25 at 06:38 -0700, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> Hi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

On 03/14/2018 02:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY > wrote: On 03/12/2018 02:32 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 03/12/2018 10:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >>       * >> >>   

Re: [Gluster-devel] Revert of 56e5fdae (SSL change) - why?

The point is, I believe, that one shouldn't have to go digging through external resources to find out why a commit exists. Please ensure the commit message has adequate accurate information. On 01/07/2018 07:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: Also please refer

Re: [Gluster-devel] Enabling core and supporting Gluster services to start by default?

Nothing should ever be auto-started. Ubuntu has it wrong. If you're going to enable any access to a machine, it should be by design, not by default. On 10/05/17 07:43, Niels de Vos wrote: Following the Fedora Packaging guidelines, services should not be started by default, or require an

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

On 05/30/2017 03:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 05/30/2017 06:37 PM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/30/2017 03:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 05/27/2017 03:02 AM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Joe Julian &l

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

On 05/30/2017 03:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 05/27/2017 03:02 AM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Joe Julian <j...@julianfamily.org <mailto:j...@julianfamily.org>> wrote: Forwarded for posterity a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Joe Julian <j...@julianfamily.org <mailto:j...@julianfamily.org>> wrote: Forwarded for posterity and follow-up. Forwarded Message Subject:Re: GlusterFS

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

Forwarded for posterity and follow-up. Forwarded Message Subject:Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 21:07:27 + From: Amye Scavarda <a...@redhat.com> To: Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com>, Joe Julian <m...@joejulia

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] 120k context switches on GlsuterFS nodes

On the other hand, tracking that stat between versions with a known test sequence may be valuable for watching for performance issues or improvements. On May 17, 2017 10:03:28 PM PDT, Ravishankar N wrote: >On 05/17/2017 11:07 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >> +

[Gluster-devel] Don't allow data loss via add-brick (was Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server)

On 04/30/2017 01:13 AM, lemonni...@ulrar.net wrote: So I was a little but luck. If I has all the hardware part, probably i would be firesd after causing data loss by using a software marked as stable Yes, we lost our data last year to this bug, and it wasn't a test cluster. We still hear from

Re: [Gluster-devel] unable to build glusterfs rpm on RHEL 6.6

To get a list of all the build requirements: grep BuildRequires glusterfs.spec or just rpmbuild -bb On 03/27/2017 06:54 AM, Manohar Mikkili wrote: Hi, I am trying to build glusterfs v3.10.0 on a RHEL 6.6 (x86_64 GNU/Linux) $./autoConfig # works fine $ ./configure --enable-fusermount

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal to deprecate replace-brick for "distribute only" volumes

On March 16, 2017 4:17:04 AM PDT, Ashish Pandey wrote: > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Atin Mukherjee" >To: "Raghavendra Talur" , gluster-devel@gluster.org, >gluster-us...@gluster.org >Sent: Thursday, March 16,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] Reducing maintenance burden and moving fuse support to an external project

The only concern I have is that according to the README syntax (I haven't looked any deeper but I suspect it's a non issue) there's a lack of rdma support. Otherwise I'm all for anything that simplifies bug fixing and improves stability. On 03/03/2017 12:50 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: At the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Should glusterfs-3.10 become the new default with its first release?

On 02/17/17 09:33, Shyam wrote: On 02/17/2017 12:01 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: I've been preparing the GlusterFS 3.10 released for the CentOS Storage SIG, and that means I need to craete a new centos-release-gluster310 package. This is the package that users install when they want to enable the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Priority based ping packet for 3.10

Yes, the earlier a fault is detected the better. On January 24, 2017 9:21:27 PM PST, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> If there are no responses to be received and no requests being >> sent to a brick, why would be a client be interested in the health of >> server/brick? > >The client

Re: [Gluster-devel] Feature proposal for 3.10 release: Support to retrieve maximum supported op-version

On 12/12/2016 10:44 AM, Shyam wrote: On 12/12/2016 01:29 PM, Joe Julian wrote: On 12/08/2016 09:22 AM, Samikshan Bairagya wrote: Hi, Currently there is no way to know the maximum op-version that is supported in a heterogeneous cluster. If this is made possible, it would prove helpful to users

Re: [Gluster-devel] Feature proposal for 3.10 release: Support to retrieve maximum supported op-version

On 12/08/2016 09:22 AM, Samikshan Bairagya wrote: Hi, Currently there is no way to know the maximum op-version that is supported in a heterogeneous cluster. If this is made possible, it would prove helpful to users wrt knowing the maximum op-version to which the cluster could be bumped up

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Feature Request: Lock Volume Settings

IMHO, if a command will result in data loss, fall it. Period. It should never be ok for a filesystem to lose data. If someone wanted to do that with ext or xfs they would have to format. On November 14, 2016 8:15:16 AM PST, Ravishankar N wrote: >On 11/14/2016 05:57

Re: [Gluster-devel] Upstream smoke test failures

Does this mean race conditions are in master and are just being retried until they're not hit? On November 13, 2016 9:33:51 PM PST, Nithya Balachandran wrote: >Hi, > >Our smoke tests have been failing quite frequently of late. While >re-triggering smoke several times in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is it possible to turn an existing filesystem (with data) into a GlusterFS brick ?

Feature requests to in Bugzilla anyway. Create your volume with the populated brick as brick one. Start it and "heal full". On November 11, 2016 7:12:03 AM PST, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > >Friday, November 11, 2016, 3:47:26 PM, you wrote: > >> Reposting to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is it possible to turn an existing filesystem (with data) into a GlusterFS brick ?

Reposting to gluster-users as this is not development related. On November 11, 2016 6:32:49 AM PST, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < >pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:24 PM,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Missing Debian packages

On 10/18/2016 09:52 AM, Shane StClair wrote: Yes, I'm well aware that packages are built by volunteers. Right now Gluster's Debian repos are breaking apt updates for anyone using these repos, all of which previously worked: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.7/LATEST/

Re: [Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting 12 Oct 2016 - Minutes

You forgot to count yourself: 6. But still ... 6 when there was 60(?) in Berlin seems light. I know the 4am time doesn't work for the west coast of America, but that only eliminates a very small percentage of those. What's up, everyone else? Can something change to make participation possible

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Duplicate entry in "gluster peer status" command

On October 4, 2016 3:40:16 PM GMT+02:00, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: >Hi, > > >Again I am getting the duplicate peer entries in the peer status >command >while restarting system which causing sync failure in the gluster >volume >between both boards. This is where you show

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

If you get credit for +1, shouldn't you also get credit for -1? It seems to me that catching a fault is at least as valuable if not more so. On October 3, 2016 3:58:32 AM GMT+02:00, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Ravishankar N

Re: [Gluster-devel] Introducing Tendrl

Does this compare to ViPR? On September 20, 2016 9:52:54 AM PDT, Ric Wheeler wrote: >On 09/20/2016 10:23 AM, Gerard Braad wrote: >> Hi Mrugesh, >> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Mrugesh Karnik >wrote: >>> I'd like to introduce the Tendrl project.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API new Port requirement

On 08/27/2016 12:15 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:52:11PM +0530, Aravinda wrote: Hi, As part of Client events support, glustereventsd needs to be configured to use a port. Following ports are already used by Gluster components. 24007 For glusterd 24008

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Documentation Tooling Review

On 08/23/2016 12:27 PM, Justin Clift wrote: On 11 Aug 2016, at 21:23, Amye Scavarda wrote: The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent and improved for our users, and they're willing to work with us to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs 3.7.11 with LibGFApi in Qemu on Ubuntu Xenial does not work

That log message shows, "port=0", instead of 24007. Not sure if that's *the* problem but it's certainly worth looking in to. On August 20, 2016 4:54:48 AM PDT, Stephen Howell wrote: >I would like to follow up on a previous thread. I have here 3 machines >running

[Gluster-devel] release-3.6 end of life

I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a "lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu 14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be stuck using for quite some time (eol of April 2019). ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing merge conflicts

On 07/07/2016 08:58 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Jeff Darcy > wrote: > What gets measured gets managed. Exactly. Reviewing is part of everyone's job, but reviews aren't tracked in any way

Re: [Gluster-devel] Snapshot Scheduler

cron isn't installed by default on Arch rather scheduling is done by systemd timers. We might want to consider using systemd.timer for systemd distros and crontab for legacy distros. On 07/08/2016 03:01 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, Snaphsots in gluster have a scheduler, which relies heavily

Re: [Gluster-devel] Hello and pull requests

On 05/03/2016 05:43 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: Hello folks, I've just started this week at Red Hat. Over the next year or so, I'll be helping with cleaning up the existing CI pipeline and improving it so that we have much better confidence with releases. Amy has been helping me get an overview

Re: [Gluster-devel] pNFS server for FreeBSD using GlusterFS

On 04/20/2016 07:23 PM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: On 21/04/16 04:43, Rick Macklem wrote: Hi, Just to let you know, I did find the email responses to my queries some months ago helpful and I now have a pNFS server for FreeBSD using the GlusterFS port at the alpha test stage. So far I have

Re: [Gluster-devel] Documentation @ readthedocs.org - search broken

- Original Message - From: "Joe Julian" <j...@julianfamily.org> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:01:10 AM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Documentation @ readthedocs.org - search broken Perhaps we should just set up the proper redirects when

Re: [Gluster-devel] Documentation @ readthedocs.org - search broken

Perhaps we should just set up the proper redirects when we remove a page? http://docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user-defined-redirects.html On 02/24/2016 08:53 PM, Prashanth Pai wrote: @Humble I know this came up recently at the developer gathering in Brno. Any update from Shaun on this ?

Re: [Gluster-devel] Restricting add-brick when volume is stopped.

I know of at least one user that created a volume then added bricks afterword before starting it as part of his scripted deployment method. Not sure if he was changing replica count. They did that because of command line length limitations. I'm not sure why they couldn't use stdin. On February

[Gluster-devel] 3.6.8 crashing a lot in production

I have multiple bricks crashing in production. Any help would be greatly appreciated. The crash log is in this bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307146 Looks like it's crashing in pl_inodelk_client_cleanup ___ Gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: 3.6.8 crashing a lot in production

Could this be a regression from http://review.gluster.org/7981 ? Forwarded Message Subject:[Gluster-devel] 3.6.8 crashing a lot in production Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:20:59 -0800 From: Joe Julian <j...@julianfamily.org> To: gluster-us...@gluster.org, g

[Gluster-devel] 3.6.8 glusterfsd processes not responding

I've also got several glusterfsd processes that have stopped responding. A backtrace from a live core, strace, and state dump follow: Thread 10 (LWP 31587): #0 0x7f81d384289c in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x7f81d383e065 in _L_lock_858 () from

Re: [Gluster-devel] presentation slides used at devconf

https://github.com/blog/1986-announcing-git-large-file-storage-lfs On 02/10/2016 03:10 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le mercredi 10 février 2016 à 12:11 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit : It'd be better if you can send a PR to glusterdocs with the odp. *grmbl* top post *grmlb* I am not sure if

Re: [Gluster-devel] changelog bug

btw... he was also having another crash in changelog_rollover: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/CyrilPeponnet/11954cbca725d4b8da7a/raw/2168169f7b208d8ee6193c4a444639505efb634b/gistfile1.txt It would be a pretty huge coincidence if these were all unique causes, wouldn't it? On 02/09/2016

Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption

On 02/08/2016 12:18 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: - Original Message - From: "Joe Julian" <j...@julianfamily.org> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 12:20:27 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption Is

Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption

Is this in current release versions? On 02/07/2016 07:43 PM, Shyam wrote: On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: - Original Message - From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" To: "Sakshi Bansal" , "Susant Palai" Cc:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFS FUSE client hangs on rsyncing lots of file

Interesting. I just encountered a hanging flush problem, too. Probably unrelated but if you want to give this a try a temporary workaround I found was to drop caches, "echo 3 > /proc/vm/drop_caches", on all the servers prior to the flush operation. On February 4, 2016 10:06:45 PM PST,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] glustershd fail to start after 3.7.7 upgrade

WTF? if (!xattrs_list) { ret = -EINVAL; gf_msg (this->name, GF_LOG_ERROR, -ret, AFR_MSG_NO_CHANGELOG, "Unable to fetch afr pending changelogs. Is op-version" " >= 30707?"); goto out; }

Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed files/directories and [cm]time updates

If the time is set on a file by the client, this increases the critical complexity to include the clients whereas before it was only critical to have the servers time synced, now the clients should be as well. Just spitballing here, but what if the time was converted at the posix layer as a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Throttling xlator on the bricks

On 01/25/16 18:24, Ravishankar N wrote: On 01/26/2016 01:22 AM, Shreyas Siravara wrote: Just out of curiosity, what benefits do we think this throttling xlator would provide over the "enable-least-priority" option (where we put all the fops from SHD, etc into a least pri queue)? For

Re: [Gluster-devel] Throttling xlator on the bricks

On 01/25/16 20:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 01/26/2016 08:41 AM, Richard Wareing wrote: If there is one bucket per client and one thread per bucket, it would be difficult to scale as the number of clients increase. How can we do this better? On this note... consider that 10's of

Re: [Gluster-devel] NSR: Suggestions for a new name

The two favorite current marketing buzzwords seem to be "Hyperconverged" and "Technology", so if we could work those in somewhere it might make it seem more hip. Maybe "Hyperconvered Replication with Leader Technology". On 01/20/16 20:38, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 01/19/2016 08:00

[Gluster-devel] Is there any advantage or disadvantage to multiple cpu cores?

Does the code take advantage of multiple cpu cores? If I assigned a single core to gluster, would it have an effect on performance? If yes, explain so I can determine a sane number of cores to allocate per server. ___ Gluster-devel mailing list

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is there any advantage or disadvantage to multiple cpu cores?

On 12/14/2015 03:27 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: - Original Message - From: "Joe Julian" <j...@julianfamily.org> To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 2:40:14 PM Subject: [Gluster-devel] Is there any advan

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dynamically changing firewalld services

On 09/07/2015 09:25 AM, Anand Nekkunti wrote: On 09/07/2015 05:08 PM, Joe Julian wrote: On 09/06/2015 09:01 PM, Kaushal M wrote: After more investigation and further discussions (sorry these happened internally), what I've found is that there is no way currently to dynamically change

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dynamically changing firewalld services

As an upstream admin, one of the things I abhor about debian/ubuntu is how services are enabled upon installation. I sure hope Fedora/EL doesn't follow their broken example. Can we enable the static firewall rule in glusterd.service? On September 4, 2015 6:37:15 AM PDT, Christopher Blum

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: Change in glusterfs[release-3.6]: glusterd: fix op-version bump up flow

On 08/15/2015 09:37 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote: I think the Jenkins client exports a GERRIT_BRANCH environment variable. If that is not the case, you can probably use git describe to find the last tag in the branch and compare that to v3.6* or similar.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Small File Performance - Strange results

3.2.7 is far beyond its supported lifetime. Please upgrade. The official PPAs can be found at https://launchpad.net/~gluster On 08/04/2015 09:55 AM, Hafeez Bana wrote: All, We've been evaluating glusterfs 3.2.7 on ubuntu 14.04 LTS. All tests were run with event-thread matching cpu-cores and

Re: [Gluster-devel] Small File Performance - Strange results

On 08/04/2015 05:53 PM, Shyam wrote: On 08/04/2015 12:55 PM, Hafeez Bana wrote: All, We've been evaluating glusterfs 3.2.7 on ubuntu 14.04 LTS. All tests were run with event-thread matching cpu-cores and lookup-unhashed turned off I think you are referring to lookup-optimize rather than

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Coreutils

I would prefer python. On 06/14/2015 11:18 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 06:45:45PM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote: On 12 June 2015 at 23:59, chris holcombe chris.holco...@canonical.com wrote: Yeah I have this repo but it's basically empty:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Coreutils

:36 PM, Joe Julian wrote: I would prefer python. On 06/14/2015 11:18 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 06:45:45PM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote: On 12 June 2015 at 23:59, chris holcombe chris.holco...@canonical.com wrote: Yeah I have this repo but it's basically empty: https

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Coreutils

On 06/14/2015 11:43 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:02 PM, chris holcombe chris.holco...@canonical.com mailto:chris.holco...@canonical.com wrote: Welcome to the party Matthew! Nice to see you're still keeping an eye on on the list. I'm excited to see

Re: [Gluster-devel] 4.0 ideas

On 05/07/2015 11:15 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: Last week, those of us who were together in Bangalore had a meeting to discuss the GlusterFS 4.0 plan. Once we'd covered what's already in the plan[1] we had a very productive brainstorming session on what else we might want to consider adding. Here

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster Slogans Revisited

I agree completely. This is the one that speaks volumes all on three words. On 05/04/2015 09:08 AM, Josh Boon wrote: Gluster: Software {re}defined storage is one I really like. I wouldn't want to eliminate Gluster completely as newcomers would then wonder about the binaries, package names

Re: [Gluster-devel] Update on mgmt_v3-locks.t failure in netbsd

No Raspberry Pi servers any more? On April 28, 2015 5:07:06 AM PDT, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote: Does this mean we're officially no longer supporting 32 bit architectures? (or is that just on x86?) + Justin On 28 Apr 2015, at 12:45, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote: Found the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Should we try alternating our Weekly Community meeting times?

I suggested it. Some other people in North America besides just myself expressed an interest in being involved, but could not make early (or very early) morning meetings. Since the globe has this cool spherical feature I thought it might be a good idea to try to get involvement from the dark

Re: [Gluster-devel] Possibly root cause for the Gluster regression test cores?

I've used clear-locks but to be fair, it's been a while and IIRC it was to recover from some other bug. On April 8, 2015 6:13:44 AM PDT, Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 06:20 PM, Justin Clift wrote: Hi Pranith, Hagarth mentioned in the weekly IRC meeting

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster Design Summit

On 02/17/2015 01:40 PM, Justin Clift wrote: On 17 Feb 2015, at 19:28, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: snip Where: I know we have a lot of international Gluster contributors who are not in the United States, so I'm open to suggestion on this point. A quick internet search seems to imply

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster 3.6.2 ls issues

3.4, not 2.4... Need more coffee!!! On 02/03/2015 11:12 AM, Joe Julian wrote: Odd, I was using sssd with home directories on gluster from 2.0 through 2.4 and never had a problem (I'm no longer at that company, but they still have home directories on Gluster). Might be worth another look

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster 3.6.2 ls issues

Odd, I was using sssd with home directories on gluster from 2.0 through 2.4 and never had a problem (I'm no longer at that company, but they still have home directories on Gluster). Might be worth another look. On 02/03/2015 10:45 AM, David F. Robinson wrote: Cancel this issue. I found the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Possibility to move our Jenkins setup to the CentOS Jenkins infra

Seems logical to me. On January 31, 2015 4:43:39 AM PST, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote: Hi all, One of the things which has been a fair drag for the developer part of the Gluster Community, is maintaining our own Jenkins infrastructure. When chatting with the CentOS guys (pre-FOSDEM)

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] v3.6.2

Is rpcbind running? On January 26, 2015 6:57:44 AM PST, David F. Robinson david.robin...@corvidtec.com wrote: Tried shutting down glusterd and glusterfsd and restarting. [2015-01-26 14:52:53.548330] I [rpc-clnt.c:969:rpc_clnt_connection_init] 0-management: setting frame-timeout to 600

[Gluster-devel] Quota problems without a way of fixing them

Paschalis (PeterA in #gluster) has reported these bugs and we've tried to find the source of the problem to no avail. Worse yet, there's no way to just reset the quotas to match what's actually there, as far as I can tell. What should we look for to isolate the source of this problem since

Re: [Gluster-devel] Quota problems without a way of fixing them

On 01/21/2015 09:32 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: - Original Message - From: Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org Cc: Paschalis Korosoglou pk...@grid.auth.gr Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:54:44 AM Subject: [Gluster-devel] Quota problems

Re: [Gluster-devel] DHT proposal for Gluster 4.0

On 01/12/2015 12:19 PM, Jan Holtzhausen wrote: Can we get a filename only hash? That's what we've always had. Shyam's proposal is to change that for the reasons stated in his document. On 2015/01/12, 6:45 PM, Shyam srang...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, There have been some discussions about

Re: [Gluster-devel] Updates to operating-version

James, why not just compute the operating version? After 3.5.0 it's always XYYZZ based on the version. Something along the lines of $version_array = split(${gluster_version}, '[.]') if $version_array[0] 3 { fail(Unsupported GlusterFS Version) } $operating_version = $version_array[2] ? {

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterd 'Management Volume' proposal

On November 27, 2014 8:13:01 AM PST, Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote: To be sure, maintaining external daemons such as etcd or consul creates its own problems. I think the ideal might be to embed a consensus protocol implementation (Paxos, Raft, or Viewstamped Replication) directly

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] info heal-failed shown as gfid

Heal-failed can be for any reason that's not defined as split brain. The only place I've been able to find clues is in the log files. Look at the timestamp on the heal-failed output and match it to log entries in glustershd logs. On November 7, 2014 6:49:36 PM PST, Peter Auyeung

Re: [Gluster-devel] Official word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?

Which means, of course, no redundancy until that self heal is completed. Furthermore, replace-brick start stopped working at all some versions ago so the removal of start and stop may as well just happen. On October 30, 2014 12:41:17 AM PDT, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote: 'replace-brick

Re: [Gluster-devel] valgrind logs for glusterfs-3.4 memory leak

Mine is caused with qcow2 images used by kvm on a fuse mount. About a half dozen very busy images causes the leak pretty consistently. Apparently, though I never got a chance to check it myself or collect any details, we had jira building and tearing down VM images, also on a fuse mount,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Objections to multi-thread-epoll and proposal to use own-thread alternative

On 10/14/2014 08:23 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: We should try comparing performance of multi-thread-epoll to own-thread, shouldn't be hard to hack own-thread into non-SSL-socket case. Own-thread has always been available on non-SSL sockets, from the day it was first implemented as part of HekaFS.

Re: [Gluster-devel] if/else coding style :-)

Not taking sides, though if I were I would support the kernel style because I, personally, find it easier to read. Just to clarify the point: $ find -name '*.c' | xargs grep '} else {' | wc -l 1284 $ find -name '*.c' | xargs grep else | grep -v '}' | wc -l 1646 On 10/13/2014 01:46 PM, Shyam

Re: [Gluster-devel] glusterfs replica volume self heal lots of small file very very slow！！why？how to improve？

To the author: You're cross posting user questions in the devel mailing list. You're not asking development questions. Please don't do that. To Pranith et al: On 10/8/2014 1:45 AM, justgluste...@gmail.com wrote: * then I config :* *cluster.self-heal-window-size is 1024(max value)*

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to fix wrong telldir/seekdir usage

Personally, I like the third option provided that doesn't cause memory issues. In fact, read the whole thing, transfer it to the client and let the client handle the posix syntax. Optionally add a path cache timeout client side that stores the directory listing for a period of time to mitigate

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs the same file but data size is different between server and client

I'm going to reiterate to make sure I understand correctly. You created a replica 2 volume. Mounted the new volume on a client. Copied a directory to the client mountpoint using cp -a (I assume). Then, on the two bricks, you checked a du -sh for that directory. If all that is correct, then

Re: [Gluster-devel] Question about file copy through libgfapi

I think we're basically talking about ODX. http://www.google.com/patents/US20120102561 On 8/22/2014 7:29 AM, Giacomo Fazio wrote: Hello Niels, Thanks for your explanation. I'm happy you consider my proposal doable and that many ideas came to your mind. I would like to contribute to it, but I

Re: [Gluster-devel] Automated split-brain resolution

Some people. Depends on use case. Dan's is pretty specific. On August 14, 2014 10:58:33 AM PDT, Harshavardhana har...@harshavardhana.net wrote: Not sure. We can figure this out by traversing up the softlinks for directories. But for files there is no way to find the parent at the moment.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Automated split-brain resolution

, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org wrote: Some people. Depends on use case. Dan's is pretty specific. Those are majority of the users/customers. ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] Automated split-brain resolution

On 08/10/2014 11:42 PM, Ravishankar N wrote: On 08/09/2014 01:23 AM, Joe Julian wrote: Thinking about it more, I'd still rather have this functionality exposed at the client through xattrs. For 5 years I've thought about this, and the more I encounter split-brain, the more I think

Re: [Gluster-devel] BitRot

Isn't that what the discussion tab is for? On 08/08/2014 10:20 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote: Venky, Could you share this document via Google docs? It would make it convenient to provide feedback via comments. ~KP - Original Message - Hi folks, Continuing the discussion on

Re: [Gluster-devel] Automated split-brain resolution

On 08/07/2014 03:08 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: On 08/07/2014 03:06 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:05:34PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: Manual resolution of split-brains [1] has been a tedious task involving

Re: [Gluster-devel] Automated split-brain resolution

Thinking about it more, I'd still rather have this functionality exposed at the client through xattrs. For 5 years I've thought about this, and the more I encounter split-brain, the more I think this is the needed approach. getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.stat returns

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for change regarding latency calculation

I would want tests of all the posix operations. Need a difference not just in throughput, but in max iops for the various ops. On 07/27/2014 08:27 AM, Vipul Nayyar wrote: Hi As guided by you, I performed the experiment regarding measurement of the effect of always enabled profiling. I

Re: [Gluster-devel] Can anyone else shed any light on this warning?

On 07/26/2014 12:02 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 07/26/2014 11:06 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 07/26/2014 03:06 AM, Joe Julian wrote: How can it come about? Is this from replacing a brick days ago? Can I prevent it from happening? [2014-07-25 07:00:29.287680] W [fuse

  1   2   >