Re: [Gluster-devel] Building GD2 from glusterd2-v5.0-0-vendor.tar.xz fails on CentOS-7

On 10/30/18 5:10 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > Thanks! But even on x86_64 there only seems to be > golang-1.8.3-1.2.1.el7.x86_64 in the buildroot. I can not find > golang-1.9.4, can you check where it comes from? The build details are > in https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=595140 and you

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Who is the package maintainer for GlusterFS 4.1?

On 10/29/18 6:31 AM, mabi wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know how I can contact the package maintainer for the > GluserFS 4.1.x packages? > > I have noticed that Debian 8 (jessie) is missing here: > > https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/4.1/4.1.5/Debian/ > > Thank you very

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: Compiling GLFS Source Tree under SLES15

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Compiling GLFS Source Tree under SLES15 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:48:21 -0400 From: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY To: David Spisla On 10/16/18 9:30 AM, David Spisla wrote: > Hello Kaleb, > I've heard that you are responsible building Gluste

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python3 build process

On 9/28/18 6:12 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Is it really needed to have this as an option? Instead of an option in > configure.ac, can it not be a post-install task in a Makefile.am? I don't fully understand how .pyc and .pyo files are used, or how the new-in-python3 __cache__ files are used, but

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python3 build process

On 9/28/18 9:38 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: >>> >>> Tests should just run with "$PYTHON run-the-test.py" instead of >>> ./run-the-test.py with a #!/usr/bin/python shebang. The testing >>> framework can also find out what version of python is available. >> >> If we back up a bit here, if all shebangs

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python3 build process

On 9/27/18 8:57 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 9/27/18 8:40 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> On 09/27/2018 08:07 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >>>> The thought is, >>>> - Add a configure option "--enable-py-version-correction" to configure, >&

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python3 build process

On 9/27/18 8:40 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 09/27/2018 08:07 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >>> The thought is, >>> - Add a configure option "--enable-py-version-correction" to configure, >>> that is disabled by default >> "correction&quo

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python3 build process

On 9/26/18 8:28 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > With the introduction of default python 3 shebangs and the change in > configure.ac to correct these to py2 if the build is being attempted on > a machine that does not have py3, there are a couple of issues > uncovered. Here is the plan to

[Gluster-devel] glusterd2 4.1 packages now available for Debian stretch and buster, and Ubuntu bionic and cosmic

Packages built from the -vendor source tar file are now available for Debian stretch and buster at [1]; and for Ubuntu xenial, bionic, and cosmic at [2]. (The existing glusterd2 4.1 packages for Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, and various SUSE and OpenSUSE are still available as always.) [1]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2018-07-20-8d7be4ac (master branch)

On 07/20/2018 05:18 PM, staticanaly...@gluster.org wrote: > > GlusterFS Coverity covscan results for the master branch are available from > http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2018-07-20-8d7be4ac/ > > Coverity covscan results for other

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster -- Storhaug NFS HA

Not sure what you're running. Storhaug-1.0 doesn't use pcs and there is no storhaug.conf On 06/27/2018 09:13 PM, anirudh narayan wrote: Team, I am trying to set up storhaug on a 3 node Centos 7.4 gluster set up. I have created the gluster volume and have exposed the volume using NFS

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On 06/18/2018 12:03 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > > GD2 packages have been built for Fedora 28 and available from the > updates-testing repo, and soon from the updates repo > Packages are also available for Fedora 29/Rawhide. > I built GD2 rpms for Fedora 27 using the -vendor tar file. They are

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] storhaug, a utility for setting up gluster+nfs-ganesha highly available NFSv3, NFSv4, NFSv4.1

---| IB switch |--- ib connection -- gluster > storage node 2 -- ethernet connection | big ethernet switch |--- > large number of gluster clients > ||--- ib connection -- gluster storage node 3 -- ethernet > connection |________| > > > > > On Fri,

[Gluster-devel] storhaug, a utility for setting up gluster+nfs-ganesha highly available NFSv3, NFSv4, NFSv4.1

storhaug-1.0 is available now. Packages for Fedora[1], RHEL/CentOS[2], and SUSE/OpenSUSE[3] are available now. Packages for Debian and Ubuntu are coming soon¹. storhaug uses CTDB to to monitor the ganesha.nfsds in a cluster and manage the associated floating IP addresses (VIPs). storhaug is a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

what about packages built in Fedora? On 06/15/2018 07:33 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > In Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:15 PM Niels de Vos wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:26:33AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> On 05/31/2018 09:22 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: As brick-mux tests were failing

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On 06/04/2018 11:32 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > > We have a proper release this time. Source tarballs are available from [1]. > > [1]: https://github.com/gluster/glusterd2/releases/tag/v4.1.0-rc0 > I didn't wait for you to do COPR builds. There are rpm packages for RHEL/CentOS 7, Fedora 27,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On 06/04/2018 11:05 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > >> And it's good that RC0 was tagged in a timely matter. Who is building >> those packages? > > I can build the RPMs. I'll build them on the COPR I've been > maintaining. But I don't believe that those can be used as the > official RPM sources. > So

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On 06/02/2018 07:47 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 12:11:55AM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:19 PM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> >>> On 05/31/2018 09:22 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: As brick-mux tests were failing (and still are on master), this was

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On 06/02/2018 07:47 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 12:11:55AM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:19 PM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> >>> On 05/31/2018 09:22 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: As brick-mux tests were failing (and still are on master), this was

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

On 03/12/2018 02:32 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 03/12/2018 10:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> * >> >> After 4.1, we want to move to either continuous numbering (like >> Fedora), or time based (like ubuntu etc) release numbers. Which >> is the model we pick is

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterD2 - 4.0.0rc1 (warning: we have a blocker for GD2)

On 03/02/2018 04:24 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > [snip] > I was able to create libglusterfsd, with just the pmap_signout nad > autoscale functions. > Turned out to be easy enough to do in the end. > I've pushed a patch for review [1] on master. > > I've also opened new bugs to track the fixes for

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterD2 - 4.0.0rc1 (warning: we have a blocker for GD2)

On 02/28/2018 10:49 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > We have a GlusterD2-4.0.0rc1 release. > > Aravinda, Prashanth and the rest of the GD2 developers have been > working hard on getting more stuff merged into GD2 before the 4.0 > release. > > At the same time I have been working on getting GD2 packaged

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: RC1 tagged

On 02/26/2018 02:03 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for packaging the same is on > its way. > > We should have packages as early as today, and request the community to > test the same and return some feedback. > > We have about 3-4 days (till

[Gluster-devel] Preview of glusterfs packaging with glusterd2 (Fedora and CentOS RPMs)

This is built on top of glusterfs-3.12. Obviously this will change to 4.0 (4.0rc0, etc.) This is derived from the .../extras/rpms/glusterd2.spec in the glusterd2 source. see https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24543030 (Having to "bundle" the generated source and the -vendor

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-packaging] Release 4.0: Making it happen! (GlusterD2)

On 01/11/2018 11:34 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> >>> One thing not covered above is what happens when GD2 fixes a high priority >>> bug between releases of glusterfs. >>> >>> Once option is we wait until the next release of glusterfs to include the >>> update to GD2. >>> >>> Or we can respin

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-packaging] Release 4.0: Making it happen! (GlusterD2)

comments inline On 01/10/2018 02:08 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, (GD2 team, packaging team, please read) Here are some things we > need to settle so that we can ship/release GD2 along with Gluster 4.0 > release (considering this is a separate repository as of now). 1) > Generating release

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community

On 01/02/2018 11:03 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: ... The people who were writing storhaug never finished it. Keep using 3.10 until storhaug gets finished. Since 3.10 will be EOL in approximately 2 months from now, what would be our answer for NFS HA if storahug is not finished by then?

Re: [Gluster-devel] Coverity fixes

On 11/02/2017 10:19 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > While I appreciate the folks to contribute lot of coverity fixes over > last few days, I have an observation for some of the patches the > coverity issue id(s) are *not* mentioned which gets maintainers in a > difficult situation to understand the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggestion to Improve performance

On 09/27/2017 04:17 AM, Mohit Agrawal wrote: > Niels, > >    Thanks for your reply, I think these built-in function provides by > gcc and it should support most of the architecture. >    In your view what could be the archietecure that does not support > these builtin function ?? see

Re: [Gluster-devel] Permission for glusterfs logs.

On 09/18/2017 09:22 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > Any suggestion would be appreciated... > > On Sep 18, 2017 15:05, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" > wrote: > > Any quick suggestion.? > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL

[Gluster-devel] FYI: longevity cluster updated

The longevity cluster has been updated to GlusterFS-3.12.1 and NFS-Ganesha-2.5.2. The cluster consists of eight servers, with an eight brick 4x2 distribute+replica volume, w/ sharding enabled. NFS-Ganesha with FSAL_GLUSTER is running on the first server. Previously ACLs had been disabled; now

Re: [Gluster-devel] Debian 3.9 repository missing?

:02 PM Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com <mailto:kkeit...@redhat.com>> wrote: 3.9 is EOL several months ago. The old repos are still there. https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/old-releases/3.9/ On 08/17/2017 02:56 PM, Shane StClair wrote: &

Re: [Gluster-devel] Debian 3.9 repository missing?

On 08/17/2017 03:01 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: 3.9 was a STM release and reached ... ... EOL several months ago. The old repos are still there. https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/old-releases/3.9/ On 08/17/2017 02:56 PM, Shane StClair wrote: Just wanted to alert Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Debian 3.9 repository missing?

3.9 is EOL several months ago. The old repos are still there. https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/old-releases/3.9/ On 08/17/2017 02:56 PM, Shane StClair wrote: Just wanted to alert Gluster devs that the 3.9 Debian repository seems to have recently disappeared, e.g. this

Re: [Gluster-devel] Adding xxhash to gluster code base

xxhash doesn't seem to change much. Last update to the non-test code was six months ago. bundling giant (for some definition of giant) packages/projects would be bad. bundling two (three if you count the test) C files doesn't seem too bad when you consider that there are already three or

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

On 06/26/2017 10:31 AM, Shyam wrote: > > In the future, we would like to stick with the release calendar, as that > is published and well known, than delay releases. Hence, when raising > blockers for a release or delaying the release, expect more questions > and diligence required around the

[Gluster-devel] Community Meeting minutes, 2017-06-21

=== #gluster-meeting: Gluster Community Meeting === Meeting started by kkeithley at 15:13:53 UTC. The full logs are available at

[Gluster-devel] The glusterfs (and nfs-ganesha) longevity cluster updated

FYI, The glusterfs and nfs-ganesha longevity cluster has been updated to glusterfs-3.11.0. (It continues to run nfs-ganesha-2.4.3 and libntirpc-1.4.3) Periodic sampling of the RSZ and VSZ of glusterd, glusterfsd, and ganesha.nfsd on the servers, and glusterfs on the client are taken while

Re: [Gluster-devel] GFID2 - Proposal to add extra byte to existing GFID

On 05/15/2017 12:48 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: >> [ snip ] >> Also, I have a question, What are the chances of uuid collision if we > take just 3 bits from the first byte ? >> >> 000 - Unspecified (can be anything). >> 001 - Directory >> 010 - Regular File >> 011 - Special files (symlink, Block

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Cleaning up Jenkins

On 04/20/2017 08:17 AM, Shyam wrote: On 04/20/2017 01:27 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: Hello folks, As I was testing the Jenkins upgrade, I realized we store quite a lot of old builds on Jenkins that doesn't seem to be useful. I'm going to start cleaning them slowly in anticipation of moving Jenkins

[Gluster-devel] MINUTES: Gluster Community Bug Triage

The minutes of the 18 April meeting: Meeting summary --- * roll call (kkeithley, 12:01:10) * next week's host (kkeithley, 12:03:55) * AIs from previous meetings (kkeithley, 12:05:04) * bug triage (kkeithley, 12:06:27) * LINK: http://bit.ly/gluster-bugs-to-triage

[Gluster-devel] Community Meeting minutes for 12 April 2017

No meeting was held on 2017-03-29. Zero people responded to the roll call. (Possibly due to many being at the Vault storage conference.) Also a very low turnout for this meeting — only five people and myself. The next meeting is on 26 April 2017 at 15:00 UTC (11AM EDT, 8AM PDT) or `date -d

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS+NFS-Ganesha longevity cluster

The longevity cluster has been updated to glusterfs-3.10.1 (from 3.8.5). General information on the longevity cluster is at [1]. In the previous update sharding was enabled on the gluster volume. This time I have added a NFS-Ganesha NFS server on one server. Its memory usage is being sampled

[Gluster-devel] MINUTES: Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting at 12:00 UTC (today)

Hi, There was no meeing on 21 March. The minutes of 28 March's meeting: Meeting summary roll call (kkeithley, 12:01:21) agenda:https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/wiki/Bug-Triage-Meeting (Saravanakmr, 12:04:06) http://bit.ly/gluster-bugs-to-triage (Saravanakmr, 12:05:25)

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dropping nightly build from download.gluster.org ?

On 03/24/2017 09:39 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:29:05PM -0400, Michael Scherer wrote: >> Another example: >> pub/gluster/glusterfs has various directory for versions of glusterfs, >> but also do have libvirt, vagrant and nfs-ganesha, who are not version, >> and might be

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS 3.9.1 released

GlusterFS 3.9.1 is a regular bug fix release for GlusterFS-3.9. The release-notes for this release can be read here[1]. The source tar file and community provided packages[2] for several popular Linux distributions can obtained from download.gluster.org[3]. The CentOS Storage SIG[4] packages are

[Gluster-devel] release-3.9 branch is frozen pending release

Hi, Please do not merge any changes to the release-3.9 branch until after the 3.9.1 release Thanks -- Kaleb ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Get GFID for a file through libgfapi

On 01/10/2017 06:33 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +, Ankireddypalle Reddy wrote: Neils, Thanks a lot. Will use this for extracting GFID. Note that this should not be the final solution for fetching the GFID. We will add an API for this to make it

Re: [Gluster-devel] What is the answer to the 3.9.1 release question?

On 01/09/2017 09:05 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > I just filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.9.1 > Assuming that Kalebs offer still is valid, this bug has been assigned to > him. Yes, it's still valid. 3.9 updates are supposed to happen on the 20th of each month. (But

Re: [Gluster-devel] What is the answer to the 3.9.1 release question?

On 01/06/2017 06:42 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Kaleb Keithley > wrote: > > > Nothing? > > > The reason I asked for 2 maintainers for the release is so that there > will be load distribution.

[Gluster-devel] What is the answer to the 3.9.1 release question?

There was considerable discussion in the community meeting yesterday. If we're not going to get one (any time soon) I'm contemplating a 3.9.0-n+1 update in Fedora, Ubuntu Launchpad PPA, etc., that would consist of 3.9.0 plus all the commits to the release-3.9 branch to date. Obviously I'd

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

On 12/19/2016 01:06 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation? >> >> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of >> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make >> it >> vote after 1

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

On 12/19/2016 12:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: >> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation? >> >> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of >> them in the next 1

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

hoice but to keep things fixed. ;-) > > Thoughts? > > > [1]: > https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-cppcheck/2016-12-19-2bb23136/cppcheck.txt > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:33:16AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >

[Gluster-devel] Notice: https://download.gluster.org:/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST has changed

Hi, As some of you may have noticed, GlusterFS-3.9.0 was released. Watch this space for the official announcement soon. If you are using Community GlusterFS packages from download.gluster.org you should check your package metadata to be sure that an update doesn't inadvertently update your

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

Ack on nfs-ganesha bits. Tentative ack on gnfs bits. Conditional ack on build, see: http://review.gluster.org/15726 http://review.gluster.org/15733 http://review.gluster.org/15737 http://review.gluster.org/15743 There will be backports to 3.9 of the last three soon. Timely reviews of

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On 10/25/2016 12:11 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:51:47AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 10/25/2016 06:46 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Aravinda <avish...@redhat.com >>> <

[Gluster-devel] Minutes from today's Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting (Oct 25 2016)

There were no meetings on Oct 11 or Oct 18 due to small number of attendees. There is no meeting next week (Nov 1) due to holiday in Bangalore. The next meeting will be Nov 8th. Please find the minutes of today's Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting at the links posted below. Minutes:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On 10/25/2016 06:46 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Aravinda > wrote: > > Hi, > > Since Automated test framework for Gluster is in progress, we need > help from Maintainers and developers to test

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting 19 Oct 2016 - Minutes

Hi all, Thank you to all the participants in today's community meeting. The next meeting is scheduled next week (October 26th) at #gluster-meeting on freenode. The minutes, logs and a summary for today's meeting can be found below. Minutes:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Missing Debian packages

I'll just leave this here https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/DOWNLOAD.README On 10/17/2016 06:56 PM, Shane StClair wrote: > Hi all, > > Debian packages are missing on download.gluster.org > for almost all versions of Gluster. Examples: > >

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting 12 Oct 2016 - Minutes

Hi all, Thank you to the five participants in today's community meeting. The next meeting is scheduled next week (October 19th) at #gluster-meeting. The minutes, logs and a summary for today's meeting can be found below. Minutes:

[Gluster-devel] Community Gluster Package Matrix, updated

Hi, With the imminent release of 3.9 in a week or two, here's a summary of the Community packages for various Linux distributions that are tentatively planned going forward. Note that 3.6 will reach end-of-life (EOL) when 3.9 is released, and no further releases will be made on the release-3.6

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFs upstream bugzilla components Fine graining

On 09/28/2016 01:54 AM, Muthu Vigneshwaran wrote: > Hi, > as we find that the above mentioned components are either > deprecated,uses GitHub for bugs/issues filing and also planned to add > the following components as the main component > > - common-ha common-ha is to (eventually) be replaced

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFs upstream bugzilla components Fine graining

On 09/28/2016 02:10 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/28/2016 11:24 AM, Muthu Vigneshwaran wrote: > >> +- Component GlusterFS >> | >> | >> | +Subcomponent nfs > > Maybe its time to change it to 'gluster-NFS/native NFS'. Niels/Kaleb? IIRC there is a separate nfs-ganesha subcomponent

Re: [Gluster-devel] make install again compiling source

On 09/19/2016 07:48 AM, Anoop C S wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 17:07 +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I ran "make -j" on the latest master, followed by make install. The >> make >> install, by itself is doing a fresh compile every time (and totally >> ignoring the make i did before

Re: [Gluster-devel] Libunwind

On 09/08/2016 10:33 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: In a few places in our code (e.g. gf_log_callingfn) we use the "backtrace" and "backtrace_symbols" functions from libc to log stack traces. Unfortunately, these functions don't

Re: [Gluster-devel] Anyone wants to maintain Mac-OSX port of gluster?

On 09/06/2016 08:03 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:30:08AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Mac OS X doesn't build at the present time because its sed utility (used in the xdrgen/rpcgen part of the build) doesn't support the (linux compatible) '-r' command line option

Re: [Gluster-devel] Anyone wants to maintain Mac-OSX port of gluster?

On 09/02/2016 03:49 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, As per MAINTAINERS file this port doesn't have maintainer. If you want to take up the responsibility of maintaining the port please let us know how you want to go about doing it and what should be the checklist of things that should

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for glusterfs packaging/build for upstream release

On 09/02/2016 03:40 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, In the past we have had issues where some of the functionality didn't work on debian/ubuntu because 'glfsheal' binary was not packaged. It was? That seems strange to me because our Debian packaging is less "selective" than our

[Gluster-devel] adding smoke test to catch printf-style format string errors

Hi, FYI, we are adding a new smoke test that builds on a 32-bit platform to catch printf-style format string errors. We have cleaned up these errors in the past, but they're creeping in again in new code and fixes. The test will start out as a non-voting test. After we get the source cleaned

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP Gluster Developer Summit

On 08/23/2016 07:29 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com > <mailto:kkeit...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 08/17/2016 09:56 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> I propose to present on

Re: [Gluster-devel] CFP Gluster Developer Summit

On 08/17/2016 09:56 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: I propose to present on one or more of the following topics: * NFS-Ganesha Architecture, Roadmap, and Status,Jiffin Thotton copresenter. * Architecture of the High Availability Solution for Ganesha and Samba - detailed walk through and demo

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] release-3.6 end of life

On 08/19/2016 11:17 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 08/19/2016 08:59 AM, Diego Remolina wrote: > >> My issue is trying to install a particular minor version, or after >> doing an update to the latest minor version change, i.e. 3.6.5 to >> 3.6.9, trying to go

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] release-3.6 end of life

On 08/19/2016 08:59 AM, Diego Remolina wrote: > My issue is trying to install a particular minor version, or after > doing an update to the latest minor version change, i.e. 3.6.5 to > 3.6.9, trying to go back to an older release, if there is a problem > with the latest. > > How does one do that

Re: [Gluster-devel] Help needed during installation of Gluster 3.8.1

On 08/19/2016 07:27 AM, Shekhar Berry wrote: >> >> Can you check and share which "userspace-rcu" version is installed in >> your machine? > rpm -qa | grep userspace-rcu > userspace-rcu-0.7.16-1.el7.x86_64 To build from source you need userspace-rcu-devel. Or you could just install prebuilt RPMs

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] release-3.6 end of life

On 08/18/2016 01:22 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: On 08/18/2016 01:10 PM, Joe Julian wrote: I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a "lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu 14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be s

Re: [Gluster-devel] release-3.6 end of life

On 08/18/2016 01:10 PM, Joe Julian wrote: I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a "lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu 14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be stuck using for quite some time (eol of April 2019). What's

Re: [Gluster-devel] FYI: change in bugzilla version(s) starting with the 3.9 release

On 08/17/2016 12:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wednesday 17 August 2016, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com > <mailto:kkeit...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > In today's Gluster Community Meeting it was tentatively agreed tha

[Gluster-devel] CFP Gluster Developer Summit

I propose to present on one or more of the following topics: * NFS-Ganesha Architecture, Roadmap, and Status * Architecture of the High Availability Solution for Ganesha and Samba - detailed walk through and demo of current implementation - difference between the current and storhaug

[Gluster-devel] FYI: change in bugzilla version(s) starting with the 3.9 release

Hi, In today's Gluster Community Meeting it was tentatively agreed that we will change how we report the GlusterFS version for glusterfs bugs. Starting with the 3.9 release there will only be a "3.9" version in bugzilla; compared to the current scheme where there are, e.g., 3.8.0, 3.8.1, ...,

Re: [Gluster-devel] readdir() harmful in threaded code

On 07/25/2016 07:26 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 07/23/2016 10:32 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: >> Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> So should we do readdir() with external locks for everything instead? >> >> readdir() with a p

Re: [Gluster-devel] readdir() harmful in threaded code

On 07/23/2016 10:32 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >> So should we do readdir() with external locks for everything instead? > > readdir() with a per-directory lock is safe. However, it may come with a > performance hit in some scenarios,

[Gluster-devel] Gluster weekly community meeting minutes 20-Jul-2016

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-07-20/gluster_community_weekly_meeting.2016-07-20-12.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-07-20/gluster_community_weekly_meeting.2016-07-20-12.00.txt Log:

[Gluster-devel] Gluster weekly community meeting minutes 13-Jul-2016

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-07-13/community_meeting.2016-07-13-12.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-07-13/community_meeting.2016-07-13-12.00.txt Log:

[Gluster-devel] Gluster weekly community meeting minutes 22-Jun-2016

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-06-22/weekly_community_meeting_-_22-jun-2016.2016-06-22-12.01.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-06-22/weekly_community_meeting_-_22-jun-2016.2016-06-22-12.01.txt Log:

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: Gluster Package Matrix, tentative

Resend. N.B. Fedora 24 just entered Beta. The plan is to update GlusterFS to 3.8 in Fedora24 before Fedora24 GA. GlusterFS-3.8 will be the standard version of GlusterFS for the life of Fedora24. Other versions of GlusterFS will be available for Fedora24 on download.gluster.org. N.B. Starting

Re: [Gluster-devel] How use Gluster/NFS

On 04/29/2016 07:34 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Abhishek Paliwal wrote: >> Hi Team, >> >> I want to use gluster NFS and export this gluster volume using 'mount -t nfs >> -o acl' command. >> >> i have done the following changes: >> 1. Enable the NFS using nfs.disable off >> 2. Enable the ACL using

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

On 01/22/2016 01:20 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > On 01/22/16 09:53, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 01/22/2016 12:43 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >>> On пʼятниця, 22 січня 2016 р. 12:32:01 EET Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >>>> I presume by this you mean you're

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

On 01/22/2016 12:15 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > OK, compiles and runs well now, I presume by this you mean you're not seeing the "kernel notifier loop terminated" error in your logs. > but still leaks. Hmmm. My system is not leaking. Last 24 hours the RSZ and VSZ are stable:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

On 01/22/2016 12:43 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > On пʼятниця, 22 січня 2016 р. 12:32:01 EET Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> I presume by this you mean you're not seeing the "kernel notifier loop >> terminated" error in your logs. > > Correct, but only with simple

[Gluster-devel] Python 3 is coming!

Python 3.5 is approved for Fedora 24[1], which is scheduled to ship in May[2] We have several places in the source where Python 2 is an explicit requirement. Do we want to rethink the hard requirement for Python 2? I suspect we should. [1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/ChangeSet

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD port of GlusterFS racks up a lot of CPU usage

On 12/30/2015 01:22 PM, Hubbard Jordan wrote: > I also have a broader question to go with the specific one: We > (at iXsystems) were attempting to engage with some of the Red Hat > folks back when the FreeBSD port was first done, in the hope of > getting it more “officially supported” for

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD port of GlusterFS racks up a lot of CPU usage

On 01/08/2016 08:58 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 12/30/2015 01:22 PM, Hubbard Jordan wrote: > >> I also have a broader question to go with the specific one: We >> (at iXsystems) were attempting to engage with some of the Red Hat >> folks back when the Fre

Re: [Gluster-devel] building/installing on FreeBSD

On 12/07/2015 08:42 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > to avoid an undefined reference for xdr_auth_glusterfs_parms_v2. > (I also found that building without libxml2 doesn't work, because fields > #if HAVE_LIB_XML are used in the code. Maybe it would be nicer if configure > failed when libxml2 isn't

Re: [Gluster-devel] libgfapi changes to add lk_owner and lease ID

On 12/04/2015 07:51 AM, Ira Cooper wrote: > why not use storage in the client_t instead of thread local? >>> >>> It comes down to the use case. For Samba, the right spot is almost >>> certainly the fd, because lease keys are a per-handle (which we map to >>> fd) property. >>> >>>

[Gluster-devel] what rpm sub-package do /usr/{libexec, sbin}/gfind_missing_files belong to?

the in-tree glusterfs.spec(.in) has them immediately following the geo-rep sub-package, but outside the %if ... %endif. Are they part of geo-rep? Or something else? -- Kaleb ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs mainline BZs to close...

On 10/26/2015 05:14 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:22:49AM -0400, Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana wrote: >> I came across the following BZs which are still open in mainline. But >> they are fixed and made available in a upstream release. Planning to >> close them this week,

Re: [Gluster-devel] RHEL-5 Client build failed

There is already a bugzilla open for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258594 for 3.7.x, and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258883 for the master branch On 10/16/2015 06:25 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Friday 16 October 2015 12:52 PM, Milind Changire wrote: >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] RHEL-5 Client build failed

On 10/16/2015 06:25 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Friday 16 October 2015 12:52 PM, Milind Changire wrote: >> Following commit to release-3.7 branch causes RHEL-5 Client build to >> fail because there isn't any available on RHEL-5 >> >> ca5b466d rpc/rpc-transport/socket/src/socket.h >> (Emmanuel

  1   2   >