[Gluster-devel] Fwd: [FOSDEM] CfP Software Defined Storage devroom FOSDEM23

Feb 4th 2023: Software Defined Storage dev room > > Talk proposals will be reviewed by a steering committee: > - Niels de Vos (Red Hat) > - Jan Fajerski (Red Hat) > - TBD > > We also welcome additional volunteers to help with making this devroom a > success. > > Use the FO

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: [Bug 2070721] New: gluster-block-target.service uses .include which hasn't been supported since F33

Does anyone know if gluster-block works on recent Linux distributions? I would appreciate it if someone can look at this bug, and propose a fix on how the service(s) need to be started correctly. Thanks, Niels - Forwarded message from bugzi...@redhat.com - > From: bugzi...@redhat.com >

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: CfP FOSDEM 22 Software Defined Storage

> > ** Important dates: > > - Jan 7th 2022: submission deadline for talk proposals > - Jan 14th 2022: announcement of the final schedule > - Feb 6th 2022: Software Defined Storage dev room > > Talk proposals will be reviewed by a steering committee: > - Niel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster 10 - RC Build for Testing

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:04:49PM +0530, Saju Mohammed Noohu wrote: > > Hello Glusterians, > > > > Ready to test drive the latest Gluster 10 release ?. > > RC0 build is ready and available here > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster 10 - RC Build for Testing

2021 at 17:47, Niels de Vos wrote: On > Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:04:49PM +0530, Saju Mohammed Noohu wrote: > > Hello Glusterians, > > > > Ready to test drive the latest Gluster 10 release ?. > > RC0 build is ready and available here > > <https://downl

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster 10 - RC Build for Testing

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:04:49PM +0530, Saju Mohammed Noohu wrote: > Hello Glusterians, > > Ready to test drive the latest Gluster 10 release ?. > RC0 build is ready and available here > . > > The highlight of this

Re: [Gluster-devel] Update on georep failure

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:19:23PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mardi 02 février 2021 à 21:06 +0200, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 8:14 PM Michael Scherer > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > so we finally found the cause of the georep failure, after several > > > days >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Archiving old projects

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 12:02:28PM +, Strahil Nikolov wrote: > Are we sure we want to archive the samba extension ? This is maintained in the main Samba project, so I think it is not needed to keep around separately. Anoop? > Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on

[Gluster-devel] [FOSDEM] CfP Software Defined Storage devroom

by a steering committee: - Niels de Vos (OpenShift Container Storage Developer - Red Hat) - Jan Fajerski (Ceph Developer - SUSE) - TBD Use the FOSDEM 'pentabarf' tool to submit your proposal: https://penta.fosdem.org/submission/FOSDEM21 - If necessary, create a Pentabarf account and activate it. Please

Re: [Gluster-devel] Centos8/RHEL8 Nightly Build for glusterfs needs to be created

--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off > bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps > /builddir/build/SPECS/glusterfs.spec > > Regards > Rinku > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:22 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:21:50PM +0530,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Centos8/RHEL8 Nightly Build for glusterfs needs to be created

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:21:50PM +0530, Rinku Kothiya wrote: > Hi Niels, > > Yaniv wanted the glusterfs nightly builds generated to be tested for > performance bottlenecks. > > I was working on the below project : > https://github.com/gluster/gluster-performance-test-suite > > As of now we

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: [fuse-devel] Call for new maintainer(s)

Gluster does not depend much (unfortunately) on libfuse. At one time we had the idea to rewrite our own implementation of the fuse bindings and use the well tested and maintained libfuse. Possibly in combination with libgfapi. This would reduce maintenance overhead quite a bit. If someone still

[Gluster-devel] Intent to retire Heketi package in Fedora

Hi all, Currently Heketi is (just a little) maintained in Fedora and packaged as an RPM for stand-alone installation (not containerized). As Heketi is a Golang application, and the Fedora Packaging Guidelines have changed since the package was included, the current Heketi packaging does not

Re: [Gluster-devel] Do we still support the '"GlusterFS 3.3" RPC client?

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 08:31:59PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > Or can we remove this code? The GlusterFS 3.3 RPC code is for the version of the protocol, and not much related to the version of Gluster itself. Newer versions of Gluster introduced protocol version 4 (maybe with Gluster 6?), but can

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change gNFS status

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:01:23PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi All, > > As per the discussion on https://review.gluster.org/23645, recently we > changed the status of gNFS (gluster's native NFSv3 support) feature to > 'Depricated / Orphan' state. (ref: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 6.6

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:25:07AM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 04:51:02AM +0200, Strahil wrote: > > Hi Niels, > > > > It seems that 5 days later, the v6.6 is still missing. > > Do you have any contacts in CentOS mailing lists that I can ask

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 6.6

s on the CentOS side. Not only the Gluster repository is affected, others as well. We're waiting for more details on the progress there. Niels > > > Best Regards, > Strahil NikolovOn Oct 31, 2019 10:39, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 07:39:56AM

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 6.6

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 07:39:56AM +, Strahil Nikolov wrote: > I can't see v6.6 for ovirt/CentOS7.7 .Is it available for CentOS 7.7 ? Packages have been handed off to the CentOS team yesterday. It is expected that the RPMs get signed and pushed to the mirrors today. In general, the

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS API to manipulate open file descriptor - glfs_fcntl?

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:20:54PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > Hi all, > > This is to check and confirm whether we have an API(or an internal > implementation which can be exposed as API) to perform operations on an > open file descriptor as a wrapper around existing fcntl() system call. > We do

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

h github migration. We surely need suggestion and volunteers > > here to get this going. > > > > Regards, > > Amar > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:38 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:57:14AM +0530, Amar Tumb

[Gluster-devel] CfP: Software Defined Storage devroom at FOSDEM 2020

for SDS clusters ** Important dates: - Nov 24th 2019: submission deadline for talk proposals - Dec 15th 2019: announcement of the final schedule - Feb 2nd 2020: Software Defined Storage dev room Talk proposals will be reviewed by a steering committee: - Niels de Vos (OpenShift Container Storage

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 7.0RC1 - Test day (26th Sep 2019)

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:19:24AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:39 AM Rinku Kothiya wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Release-7 RC1 packages are built. We are planning to have a test day on > > 26-Sep-2019, we request your participation. Do post on the lists any > > testing

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:57:14AM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:10 AM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:36:30PM +0530, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna > > Murthy wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:36:30PM +0530, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna Murthy wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian wrote: > > > > Comparing the changes between revisions is something > > that GitHub does not support... > > > > It does support that, > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:56:53PM -0400, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, 9:13 Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > Hi developers, > > > > With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around > > this topic. > > > > We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] What if client fuse process crash?

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:47:46PM +0800, Changwei Ge wrote: > Hi Niels, > > On 2019/8/6 3:50 下午, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:14:46PM +0800, Changwei Ge wrote: > > > On 2019/8/6 2:57 下午, Ravishankar N wrote: > > > > On 06/08/19 11:44

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] What if client fuse process crash?

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:14:46PM +0800, Changwei Ge wrote: > On 2019/8/6 2:57 下午, Ravishankar N wrote: > > > > On 06/08/19 11:44 AM, Changwei Ge wrote: > > > Hi Ravishankar, > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your share, it's very useful to me. > > > > > > I am setting up a glusterfs storage

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 5.7 or 5.8

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:02:48PM +0530, Hari Gowtham wrote: > Hi, > > We came across an build issue with release 5.7. It was related the > python version. > A fix for it ha been posted [ > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/23028 ] > Once we take this fix in we need to go ahead with

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

a bit too late with the 5 series releases. If we are fine with > this approach, > I will send out a mail informing this, work on the patch and push it. > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 6:48 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 05:03:53PM +0200, Michael Schere

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 05:03:53PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le jeudi 04 juillet 2019 à 16:20 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit : > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > Le mercredi 03 juillet 2019 à 20:03 +0530, Deepshikha Khandelwal a > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mercredi 03 juillet 2019 à 20:03 +0530, Deepshikha Khandelwal a > écrit : > > Misc, is EPEL got recently installed on the builders? > > No, it has been there since september 2016. What got changed is that > python3 wasn't

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:42:06PM +0530, Deepshikha Khandelwal wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 3:20 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 02:56:51PM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:35 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 02:56:51PM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:35 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 02:11:21PM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:13 PM Niels de Vos wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 02:11:21PM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:13 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:36:46AM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > > > Considering python3 is anyways the future, I vote fo

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 7:26 PM Michael Scherer wrote: > > > Le jeudi 13 juin 2019 à 14:28 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit : > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:08:25AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:09:55PM -0700, Kaleb Keithley wrote:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:08:25AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:09:55PM -0700, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:36 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:43 AM Amar Tumballi Suryana

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:09:55PM -0700, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:36 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:43 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < > > atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> We recently noticed that in one of the package update on

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

ny recent backports to release-5 that introduced this behaviour. Maybe it is related to the builder where the tarball is generated. The job seems to detect python-3.6.8, which is not included in CentOS-7 for all I know? Maybe someone else understands how this can happen? HTH, Niels > > On Wed,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing glupy from release 5.7

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:44:04PM +0530, Hari Gowtham wrote: > Hi, > > Due to the recent changes we made. we have a build issue because of glupy. > As glupy is already removed from master, we are thinking of removing > it in 5.7 as well rather than fixing the issue. > > The release of 5.7 will

Re: [Gluster-devel] Meeting Details on footer of the gluster-devel and gluster-user mailing list

On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:37:27AM -0700, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:15 AM FNU Raghavendra Manjunath > wrote: > > > > > + 1 to this. > > > > I have updated the footer of gluster-devel. If that looks ok, we can extend > it to gluster-users too. > > In case of a month with 5

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster-block v0.4 is alive!

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:04:41PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > Hello Gluster folks, > > Gluster-block team is happy to announce the v0.4 release [1]. > > This is the new stable version of gluster-block, lots of new and > exciting features and interesting bug fixes are made available as part

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] BZ updates

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:44:10AM +0530, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > All, > > When working on a bug, please ensure that you update the BZ with any > relevant information as well as the RCA. I have seen several BZs in the > past which report crashes, however they do not have a bt or RCA

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regards glusterd.service is not started automatically after reboot the node

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:36:09AM +0530, Mohit Agrawal wrote: > Hi, > > We are facing an issue after install glusterfs-6 rpms. After reboot, the > node glusterd.service is not started automatically because >glusterd.service is not enabled by the installation script.I am not able > to find

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:52:33PM -0700, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:44 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nithya Balachandran > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >> > >>> All, > >>> > >>> In

Re: [Gluster-devel] gfapi: add function to set client-pid

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 03:00:27PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: > Hello, > > I'm planning to expose setting client-pid for gfapi clients via a new api, > something like `glfs_set_client_pid (fs, pid)`. > The functionality already exists for fuse mounts via the --client-pid=$PID > option, where the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Building Glusterfs-5.3 on armhf

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 01:43:55PM -0500, Richard Betel wrote: > I've got some odroid HC2's running debian 9 that i'd like to run gluster > on, but I want to run something current, not 3.8! So I'm trying to build > 5.3, but I can't get through the./configure. > > At first, I forgot to run

Re: [Gluster-devel] [CI-results] gluster_build-rpms - Build # 9068 - Still Failing! (release-3.12 on CentOS-6/x86_64)

On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 12:27:56PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 01:17:11AM +, c...@centos.org wrote: > > gluster_build-rpms - Build # 9068 - Still Failing: > > > > Check console output at https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_build-rpms/9068/ &g

[Gluster-devel] Dynamic provisioning does not provide the amount of 'free space' that was requested

The KubeVirt team found a bug in how Heketi provisions requested volumes (PVCs). The problem that they hit is related to how much overhead a filesystem needs vs how much free space is expected. This comes down to the following: - Heketi gets asked to provision a volume of 4GB - checking the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Centos CI automation Retrospective

On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:32:12AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > On Monday, I merged in the changes that allowed all the jobs in Centos CI > to be handled in an automated fashion. In the past, it depended on Infra > team members to review, merge, and apply the changes on Centos CI.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Building GD2 from glusterd2-v5.0-0-vendor.tar.xz fails on CentOS-7

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:46:36AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 10/30/18 5:10 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > > Thanks! But even on x86_64 there only seems to be > > golang-1.8.3-1.2.1.el7.x86_64 in the buildroot. I can not find > > golang-1.9.4, can

Re: [Gluster-devel] Building GD2 from glusterd2-v5.0-0-vendor.tar.xz fails on CentOS-7

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:45:35PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:50 AM Kaushal M wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:20 AM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > not sure what is going wrong when building

[Gluster-devel] Building GD2 from glusterd2-v5.0-0-vendor.tar.xz fails on CentOS-7

Hi, not sure what is going wrong when building GD2 for the CentOS Storage SIG, but it seems to fail with some golang import issues: https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/5141/595141/build.log + cd glusterd2-v5.0-0 ++ pwd + export

Re: [Gluster-devel] Adding ALUA support for Gluster-Block

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:06:53PM +0530, Susant Palai wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 6:22 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 05:54:28PM +0530, Susant Palai wrote: > > > Hi, > > >For ALUA in Gluster-Block, we need fencing support from Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Adding ALUA support for Gluster-Block

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 05:54:28PM +0530, Susant Palai wrote: > Hi, >For ALUA in Gluster-Block, we need fencing support from GlusterFS. This > is targeted mainly to avoid corruption issues during fail-over from > INITIATOR. > > You can find the problem statement, design document at [1] and

[Gluster-devel] FOSDEM Call for Participation: Software Defined Storage devroom

proposals will be reviewed by a steering committee: - Niels de Vos (Gluster Developer - Red Hat) - Jan Fajerski (Ceph Developer - SUSE) - other volunteers TBA Use the FOSDEM 'pentabarf' tool to submit your proposal: https://penta.fosdem.org/submission/FOSDEM19 - If necessary, create a Pentabarf

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:00:50AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 10/10/2018 11:20 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:30, Shyam Ranganathan > > wrote: > > > > The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [ovirt-devel] Re: Status update on "Hyperconverged Gluster oVirt support"

On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:53:42PM +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018, 5:03 PM Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > > > /dev/disk-by-id could be problematic. it only showing disks that have been > > formatted. > > > > For example, I've just created a node with 3 disks and on Anaconda I chose > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python3 build process

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:14:15AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 09/28/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 08:57:06AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > >> On 09/28/2018 06:12 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:40

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python3 build process

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 08:57:06AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 09/28/2018 06:12 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:40:54AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > >> On 09/27/2018 08:07 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >>>> The thought is

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python3 build process

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:40:54AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 09/27/2018 08:07 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >> The thought is, > >> - Add a configure option "--enable-py-version-correction" to configure, > >> that is disabled by default > > "correction" implies there's something that's

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster-gnfs missing in CentOS repos

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 02:28:32PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:04 PM Sahina Bose wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > gluster-gnfs rpms are missing in 4.0/4.1 repos in CentOS storage. Is this > > intended? > > > > Rephrasing my question - is there plans to push gluster-gnfs

Re: [Gluster-devel] [heketi-devel] Heketi v8.0.0 available for download

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 07:43:47PM -0400, John Mulligan wrote: > Heketi v8.0.0 is now available [1]. > > This is the new stable version of Heketi. > > Major additions in this release: > * Resumable delete of Volumes and Block Volumes > * Server administrative modes > * Throttling of concurrent

Re: [Gluster-devel] Clang-Formatter for GlusterFS.

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 02:25:22PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: ... > What rules does clang impose on function/argument wrapping and alignment? I > somehow found the new code wrapping to be random and highly unreadable. An > example of 'before and after' the clang format patches went in: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal to change Gerrit -> Bugzilla updates

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:38:04AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 09/10/2018 08:37 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > We now have review.gluster.org as an > > external tracker on Bugzilla. Our current automation when there is a > > bugzilla attached

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Announcing Glusterfs release 3.12.13 (Long Term Maintenance)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:49:38PM +0200, Paolo Margara wrote: > Hi, > > we’ve now tested version 3.12.13 on our ovirt dev cluster and all seems > to be ok (obviously it's too early to see if the infamous memory leak > issue got fixed), I think that should be safe to move related packages > from

Re: [Gluster-devel] Problems about acl_get_file used in posix_pacl_get

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 05:22:17PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote: > Hi Niels, > > On 2018/8/17 17:13, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:04:43PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote: > >> Hello folks, > >> > >> nfs-ganesha using the new gfapi named glf

Re: [Gluster-devel] Problems about acl_get_file used in posix_pacl_get

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:04:43PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote: > Hello folks, > > nfs-ganesha using the new gfapi named glfs_h_acl_set/glfs_h_acl_get, > at xlator posix, glusterfsd calls acl_get_file/acl_set_file (libacl > functions) to process xattrs. > > By default,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Access to Docker Hub Gluster organization

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 02:09:59PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > Do we know who's the admin of the Gluster organization on Docker hub? I'd > like to be added to the org so I can set up nightly builds for all the > GCS-related containers. Nice! Which containers are these? The ones

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Master branch lock down: RCA for tests (UNSOLVED ./tests/basic/stats-dump.t)

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 02:32:19PM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 08/12/2018 08:42 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > As a means of keeping the focus going and squashing the remaining tests > > that were failing sporadically, request each test/component owner to, > > > > - respond to this

Re: [Gluster-devel] ASAN Builds!

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 05:50:28PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > Thanks to Niels, we now have ASAN builds compiling and a flag for getting > it to work locally. The patch[1] is not merged yet, but I can trigger runs > off the patch for now. The first run is off[2] > > [1]:

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 09:47:38AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 07/31/2018 02:12 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 02:44:57PM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > >> On 07/28/2018 12:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 02:44:57PM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 07/28/2018 12:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:37:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > >> This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins > >> slave(s). With th

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:37:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins > slave(s). With the library available, we can now drop the bundled and > unmaintained contrib/argp-standlone/ from our glusterfs sources. > > Unfortu

[Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins slave(s). With the library available, we can now drop the bundled and unmaintained contrib/argp-standlone/ from our glusterfs sources. Unfortunately building on FreeBSD fails if the header/library is installed. This has been

Re: [Gluster-devel] Github teams/repo cleanup

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 02:38:57PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mercredi 25 juillet 2018 à 14:08 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > Le mercredi 25 juillet 2018 à 16:06 +0530, Nigel Babu a écrit : > > > I think our team structure on Github has become unruly. I prefer > > > that > > > we > >

[Gluster-devel] RFC: adding support for copy_file_range()

Hi, at one point we'd like to add support for copy-offloading or server-side-copy to GlusterFS. The FUSE interface should probably map to the copy_file_range() systemcall. In order to prepare support in Gluster for this, I have posted the following changes and would like comments on them. -

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: Clang-format: Update

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:28:21PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:52:24PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > A while ago we talked about usi

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: Clang-format: Update

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:52:24PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > A while ago we talked about using clang-format for our codebase[1]. We > started doing several pieces of this work asynchronously. Here's an update > on the current state of affairs: > > * Team agrees on a style and a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 05:03:38PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > In Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:15 PM Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:26:33AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > > On 05/31/2018 09:22 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > > > As bri

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:26:33AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 05/31/2018 09:22 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > As brick-mux tests were failing (and still are on master), this was > > holding up the release activity. > > > > We now have a final fix [1] for the problem, and the situation

[Gluster-devel] copy_file_range() syscall for offloading copying of files?

Hi Pranith and Amar, The copy_file_range() syscall can support reflinks on the (local) filesystem. This is something I'd really like to see in Gluster soonish. There is https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/349 which discusses some of the technical bits, but there has not been an updated

Re: [Gluster-devel] Update md-cache after triggering FOP via syncop framework?

use problems. You could send a patch that explains your need and changes the location of WORM (or upcall?) in the graph (see server_graph_table in xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-volgen.c). Niels > > Regards > David > > 2018-06-05 9:51 GMT+02:00 Niels de Vos : > > > On Mon, Jun

Re: [Gluster-devel] Update md-cache after triggering FOP via syncop framework?

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:23:05PM +0200, David Spisla wrote: > Dear Gluster-Devels, > > I'm currently using the syncop framework to trigger certain file operations > within the Server Translators stack. At the same time, file attributes such > as file rights and timestamps are changed (atime,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:02:30PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:54 PM Kaushal M wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:39 PM Kaushal M wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 12:11 AM Kaushal M wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:19 PM Shyam Ranganathan >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: Branched

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 12:11:55AM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:19 PM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > > > On 05/31/2018 09:22 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > > As brick-mux tests were failing (and still are on master), this was > > > holding up the release activity. > > > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.10, 3.12, 4.0: Tagged for release

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:24:42AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 04/24/2018 04:14 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:43:29AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The next set of minor updates for 3.10/12 and 4.0

[Gluster-devel] Monitoring and acting on LVM thin-pool consumption

Recently I have been implementing "volume clone" support in Heketi. This uses the snapshot+clone functionality from Gluster. In order to create snapshots and clone them, it is required to use LVM thin-pools on the bricks. This is where my current problem originates When there are cloned

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: LTM release targeted for end of May

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:17:28AM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Shyam Ranganathan > wrote: > > > On 03/21/2018 04:12 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > Current 4.1 project release lane is empty! I cleaned it up, because I > > > want to

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Proposing]GlusterFS Test Day

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:13:18AM -0500, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey Niels, > > I work for the Fedora QA team and I was wondering if you would like to > have a GlusterFS test day which is where we can test GlusterFS for F28 > (specially the modular server) Hi Sumantro! It would be great

Re: [Gluster-devel] gNFS service management from glusterd

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:25:21PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Xavi Hernandez wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > currently glusterd sends a SIGKILL to stop gNFS, while all other services > > are stopped with a SIGTERM signal first (this can be

Re: [Gluster-devel] run-tests-in-vagrant

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:15:28AM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:08:51AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > So we have a job that's unmaintained and unwatched. If nobody steps up to > > own it in the next 2 weeks, I'll be deleting this job. > > I

Re: [Gluster-devel] run-tests-in-vagrant

enkins slaves (without the Jenkins bits and other internal pieces) from the same deployment as the slaves? That would make things less manual and much easier to consume. Thanks! Niels > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 1

Re: [Gluster-devel] run-tests-in-vagrant

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:15:23AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello, > > Centos CI has a run-tests-in-vagrant job. Do we continue to need this > anymore? It still runs master and 3.8. I don't see this job adding much > value at this point given we only look at results that are on >

[Gluster-devel] use-case for 4 replicas and 1 arbiter

Hi Ravi, Last week I was in a discussion about 4-way replication and one arbiter (5 bricks per set). It seems that it is not possible to create this configuration through the CLI. What would it take to make this available? The idea is to get a high available storage, split over three

Re: [Gluster-devel] Preview of glusterfs packaging with glusterd2 (Fedora and CentOS RPMs)

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:37:20PM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > This is built on top of glusterfs-3.12. Obviously this will change to > 4.0 (4.0rc0, etc.) This is derived from the > .../extras/rpms/glusterd2.spec in the glusterd2 source. > > see

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Rafi KC attending DevConf and FOSDEM

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 06:24:36PM +0530, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm attending both DevConf (25-28) and Fosdem (3-4). If any of you are > attending the conferences and would like to talk about gluster, please > feel free to ping me through irc nick rafi on freenode or message me

Re: [Gluster-devel] a link issue maybe introduced in a bug fix " Don't let NFS cache stat after writes"

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:24:06PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi, >In the same commit you mentioned earlier, there was this code > earlier: > -/* Returns 1 if the stat seems to be filled with zeroes. */ > -int > -nfs_zero_filled_stat (struct iatt *buf) > -{ > -if

Re: [Gluster-devel] Rawhide RPM builds failing

een caused by a broken package in Fedora Rawhide. I could not identify a real bug in the .spec. Niels > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:14:51AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > Hello folks, > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Rawhide RPM builds failing

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:14:51AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > Our rawhide rpm builds seem to be failing with what looks like a specfile > issue. It's worth looking into this now before F28 is released in May. Do you have more details? The errors from a build.log from mock would

Re: [Gluster-devel] Setting up dev environment

more userfriendly too. It is probably worth it to fix your settings at one point. Niels > > Thanks and Regards, > Ram > > -----Original Message- > From: Niels de Vos [mailto:nde...@redhat.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 8:13 AM > To: Ram Ankireddypalle >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >