Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 7.4

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 2:53 PM Artem Russakovskii wrote: > Typo here:"cashes" > #1785323: glusterfsd cashes after a few seconds > Thank you for catching that. I have opened a pull request [1] to address a couple of typos in the release notes. Cheers, Vijay [1]

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] In-place volume type conversion

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 7:37 AM Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Is it technically possible/feasible to implement an in-place volume > conversion, > at least for volumes with the same number of bricks (say, from 'replica 3' > to > 'disperse 3')? If so, any thoughts on initial steps? > > The backend

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:12 AM Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi developers, > > With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around > this topic. > > We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many projects which > follow complete github workflow, where as there are few,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Re-Compile glusterd1 and add it to the stack

Hi David, If the option is related to a particular translator, you would need to add that option in the options table of the translator and add code in glusterd-volgen.c to generate that option in the volfiles. Would it be possible to share the code diff that you are trying out? Regards, Vijay

Re: [Gluster-devel] Meeting Details on footer of the gluster-devel and gluster-user mailing list

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:08 AM Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:37:27AM -0700, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:15 AM FNU Raghavendra Manjunath < > rab...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > + 1 to this. &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Meeting Details on footer of the gluster-devel and gluster-user mailing list

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:15 AM FNU Raghavendra Manjunath wrote: > > + 1 to this. > I have updated the footer of gluster-devel. If that looks ok, we can extend it to gluster-users too. In case of a month with 5 Tuesdays, we can skip the 5th Tuesday and always stick to the first 4 Tuesdays of

Re: [Gluster-devel] Query regarding dictionary logic

the reason to keep the hash value 1 was done during >>> the time when we had dictionary itself sent as on wire protocol, and in >>> most other places, number of entries in dictionary was on an avg, 3. So, we >>> felt, saving on a bit of memory for optimization was bette

Re: [Gluster-devel] Query regarding dictionary logic

Hi Mohit, On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:15 AM Mohit Agrawal wrote: > Hi All, > > I was just looking at the code of dict, I have one query current > dictionary logic. > I am not able to understand why we use hash_size is 1 for a > dictionary.IMO with the > hash_size of 1 dictionary always work

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Quick update on glusterd's volume scalability improvements

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:42 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > All, > > As many of you already know that the design logic with which GlusterD > (here on to be referred as GD1) was implemented has some fundamental > scalability bottlenecks at design level, especially around it's way of > handshaking

Re: [Gluster-devel] Following up on the "Github teams/repo cleanup"

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:59 PM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri 29 Mar, 2019, 01:04 Vijay Bellur, wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:39 AM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < >> sankarshan.mukhopa

Re: [Gluster-devel] Following up on the "Github teams/repo cleanup"

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:39 AM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:34 PM John Strunk wrote: > > > > Thanks for bringing this to the list. > > > > I think this is a good set of guidelines, and we should publicly post > and enforce

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:44 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> In the last few releases of glusterfs, with stability as a primary theme >>> of the releases,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Network Block device (NBD) on top of glusterfs

Hi Xiubo, On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 5:48 PM Xiubo Li wrote: > On 2019/3/21 11:29, Xiubo Li wrote: > > All, > > I am one of the contributor for gluster-block > [1] project, and also I > contribute to linux kernel and open-iscsi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

brick/brick > Options Reconfigured: > performance.client-io-threads: off > storage.build-pgfid: on > cluster.self-heal-daemon: enable > performance.readdir-ahead: off > nfs.disable: off > > > There are 11 other volumes and all are similar. > > > On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 13:59 -0700

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

Thank you for the reproducer! Can you please let us know the output of `gluster volume info`? Regards, Vijay On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:53 PM Jim Kinney wrote: > This python will fail when writing to a file in a glusterfs fuse mounted > directory. > > import mmap > > # write a simple example

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS development Environment-Debug

Hello Rajib, On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 1:29 PM Rajib Hossen wrote: > Hello All, > I am new to development of GlusterFS and have some experience in > competitive programming in C. I want to implement systematic code for > erasure coding in glusterfs. I would like to setup debugging environment. I

Re: [Gluster-devel] Different glusterfs clients's data not consistent.

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 1:21 PM 快乐 <994506...@qq.com> wrote: > Three node： node1， node2, node3 > > Steps: > > 1. gluster volume create volume_test node1:/brick1 > 2. gluster volume set volume_test cluster.server-quorum-ratio 51 > 3. gluster volume set volume_test cluster.server-quorum-type

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:20 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I am not sure how BZ 1683815 > can be a blocker at > RC. We have a fix ready, but to me it doesn't look like a blocker. Vijay - > any objections? > None from me as it is an existing

Re: [Gluster-devel] I/O performance

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:57 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 7:00 AM Poornima Gurusiddaiah > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 10:53 PM Xavi Hernandez > wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 1:51 PM Xavi Hernandez >>> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 1:25 PM

Re: [Gluster-devel] I/O performance

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:12 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 7:54 AM Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:01 AM Xavi Hernandez >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've been doing some tests with

Re: [Gluster-devel] I/O performance

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:01 AM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > Hi, > > I've been doing some tests with the global thread pool [1], and I've > observed one important thing: > > Since this new thread pool has very low contention (apparently), it > exposes other problems when the number of threads grows.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Performance improvements

Thank you for the detailed update, Xavi! This looks very interesting. On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:50 AM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just updated a patch [1] that implements a new thread pool based on a > wait-free queue provided by userspace-rcu library. The patch also includes > an

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Server outage yesterday

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 2:20 PM Michael Scherer wrote: > Hi, > > I just found out that we suffered a outage yesterday night from 22h UTC > to 23h40 (I was out on PTO after a flight, and supervision couldn't > send text messages due to network issue). > > The root cause is a networking issue, and

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] On making ctime generator enabled by default in stack

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 8:25 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:41 PM Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:31 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 6,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] On making ctime generator enabled by default in stack

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:31 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:58 AM Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:56 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa >> wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> There is

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] On making ctime generator enabled by default in stack

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:56 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > All, > > There is a patch [1] from Kotresh, which makes ctime generator as default > in stack. Currently ctime generator is being recommended only for usecases > where ctime is important (like for Elasticsearch). However, a reliable >

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster-ansible: status of the project

Thank you for this report! On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:34 AM Sachidananda URS wrote: > Hi, > > gluster-ansible project is aimed at automating the deployment and > maintenance of GlusterFS cluster. > > The project can be found at: > > * https://github.com/gluster/gluster-ansible > *

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs v4.1.1 issue encountered while executing test case ./tests/features/trash.t

Hi Abhay, trash is not enabled by default and is considered an experimental feature in Gluster. You can ignore the failure in trash.t while we fix the problem for your architecture. I will update through the bug if any other information is necessary from you. Thanks, Vijay On Thu, Sep 27, 2018

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] add-brick fails with error about /dev/fuse

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:44 AM Chaloulos, Klearchos (Nokia - GR/Athens) < klearchos.chalou...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hello, > > We are using glusterfs version 3.7.14, and have deployed the glusterfs > servers in containers. We are trying to use the “gluster volume add-brick” > command to extend a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Cloudsync with AFR

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:49 PM Anuradha Talur wrote: > Hi, > > We recently started testing cloudsync xlator on a replica volume. > And we have noticed a few issues. We would like some advice on how to > proceed with them. > > 1) As we know, when stubbing a file cloudsync uses mtime of files to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs v4.1.1 issue encountered while executing test case ./tests/features/trash.t

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:24 AM Abhay Singh wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > As per your previous reply, i tried running the test cases using the > endianess check through the command lscpu | grep "Big endian". Thankfully, > the namespace.t test case passed successfully. This is good to hear. Would you

[Gluster-devel] Announcing Gluster for Container Storage (GCS)

Hi all, We would like to let you know that some of us have started focusing on an initiative called ‘Gluster for Container Storage’ (in short GCS). As of now, one can already use Gluster as storage for containers by making use of different projects available in github repositories associated

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Documentation Hackathon - 7/19 through 7/23

Once you are done with your bit for Gluster documentation, please update your contributions here [2] for better co-ordination. Thanks, Vijay [2] http://bit.ly/gluster-doc-hack-report On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:57 AM Vijay Bellur wrote: > Hey All, > > We are organizing a hackathon t

[Gluster-devel] Gluster Documentation Hackathon - 7/19 through 7/23

Hey All, We are organizing a hackathon to improve our upstream documentation. More details about the hackathon can be found at [1]. Please feel free to let us know if you have any questions. Thanks, Amar & Vijay [1]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Re-thinking gluster regression logging

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:59 AM Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > Deepshikha is working on getting the distributed-regression testing into > production. This is a good time to discuss how we log our regression. We > tend to go with the approach of "get as many logs as possible" and then we >

Re: [Gluster-devel] compilation failure: rpcsvc.c:1003:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'xdr_sizeof' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:59 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > Hello, > > First time trying to compile from source. > > The compilation part of 'make install' fails with: > rpcsvc.c:528:17: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long > unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'u_int32_t'

Re: [Gluster-devel] Storing list of dentries of children in parent inode

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:15 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > All, > > There is a requirement in write-behind where during readdirp we may have > to invalidate iatts/stats of some of the children of the directory [1]. For > lack of better alternatives I added a dentry list to parent inode which

Re: [Gluster-devel] Disabling use of anonymous fds in open-behind

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > All, > > This is an option in open-behind, which lets fuse native mounts to use > anonymous fds. The reasoning being since anonymous fds are stateless, > overhead of open is avoided and hence better performance. However, bugs > filed

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Update: Gerrit review system has one more command now

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi all, > > As a push towards more flexibility to our developers, and options to run > more tests without too much effort, we are moving towards more and more > options to trigger tests from Gerrit during reviews. > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2018 07:04 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > > > > On 03/14/2018 02:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Kal

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 03/12/2018 02:32 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > On 03/12/2018 10:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >> * > >> > >> After 4.1, we want to move to either continuous numbering (like > >> Fedora),

Re: [Gluster-devel] gNFS service management from glusterd

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:25:21PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Xavi Hernandez > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > currently glusterd sends a SIGKILL to stop

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing regression time of glusterd test cases

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > This is completed and the changes are in mainline. We have managed to > bring down the regression time for glusterd tests by more than half. A big > shout to Sanju and Gaurav for taking this to completion. > That

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs and Structured data

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Raghavendra G <raghaven...@gluster.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowd...@redhat.com >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs and Structured data

On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > All, > > One of our users pointed out to the documentation that glusterfs is not > good for storing "Structured data" [1], while discussing an issue [2]. As far as I remember, the content around structured data

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Making it happen!

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:27 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 01/10/2018 01:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 4.0 branching date is slated on the 16th of Jan 2018 and release is > > slated for the end of Feb (28th), 2018. > > This is today! So read on... > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Integration of GPU with glusterfs

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Ashish Pandey wrote: > > It is disappointing to see the limitation being put by Nvidia on low cost > GPU usage on data centers. > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/03/nvidia_server_gpus/ > > We thought of providing an option in glusterfs

Re: [Gluster-devel] Determine if a file is open in a cluster

Hi Ram, Do you want to check this from within a translator? If so, you can look for GLUSTERFS_OPEN_FD_COUNT in xlators like dht, afr, ec etc. where they check for open file descriptors in various FOPs. Regards, Vijay On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Ram Ankireddypalle

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] 2018 - Plans and Expectations on Gluster Community

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo h...@hetz.biz>> wrote: >> >> Hi Amar, >> >> If can say something about the development of GlusterFS - is that >> there are 2 missing

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Schedule and scope clarity (responses needed)

Top posting here. I would like to propose that all new features for 4.x have tests in glusto and that one successful run of those tests as a necessary condition for the release to happen. This effort would help us catch regressions that happen in multi node setups and also prevent accrual of

Re: [Gluster-devel] Coverity fixes

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 at 18:31, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY > wrote: > >> On 11/02/2017 10:19 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> > While I appreciate the folks to contribute lot of coverity fixes over >> > last few

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Client Server incompatibility with Gluster 4.0

l storage that it involves, down time for upgrades should > not be a choice that we should consider, when possible. > Agreed. We can and should reduce the user pain for this upgrade. Let us also explore ways to keep our code clean and prevent that from becoming a spaghetti mess :-).

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Client Server incompatibility with Gluster 4.0

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Was (Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposed Protocol changes for 4.0: Need feedback.) > > All, > > While we are at making all the below tasks' color coding to GREEN, it > would make sense to discuss 1 main thing. > > With 4.0, we

Re: [Gluster-devel] gfproxy

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > Hi, > > This mail is regarding the gfproxy feature, please go through the same and > let us know your thoughts. > > About the gfproxy feature: > --- > As per the current

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster documentation search

Great work, Nigel! This solves a problem that has bothered us for a while. Thank you! -Vijay On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > I spend some time today mucking about trying to figure out how to make our > documentation search a better

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Brick count limit in a volume

Can you also please provide more detail on why those many bricks are needed in a single volume? Thanks, Vijay On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > An upstream bug would be ideal as github issue is mainly used for > enhancements. In the mean time, could

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: tendrl-release v1.5.0 (Milestone1) is available

Thank you Rohan for letting us know about this release! I looked for screenshots of the dashboard and found a few at [1]. Are there more screenshots that you can share with us? Regards, Vijay [1] https://github.com/Tendrl/documentation/wiki/Metrics On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Rohan

Re: [Gluster-devel] Changing the relative order of read-ahead and open-behind

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > Hi all, > > We've a bug [1], due to which read-ahead is completely disabled when the > workload is read-only. One of the easy fix was to make read-ahead as an > ancestor of open-behind in xlator graph (Currently

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost

Do you observe any event pattern (self-healing / disk failures / reboots etc.) after which the extended attributes are missing? Regards, Vijay On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy wrote: > We lost the attributes on all the bricks on servers glusterfs2 and

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster statedumps and mallinfo

On 07/03/2017 05:55 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: Hi, Recently I observed one of the mallinfo fields had a negative value. DUMP-START-TIME: 2017-06-09 10:59:43.747440 [mallinfo] mallinfo_arena=-1517670400 mallinfo_ordblks=8008214 mallinfo_smblks=0 mallinfo_hblks=1009

[Gluster-devel] Support for statx in 4.0

Hey All, Linux 4.11 has added support for a new system call, statx [1]. statx provides more information than what stat() does today. Given that there could be potential users for this new interface it would be nice to have statx supported in 4.0. We could review if some of our translators,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Qusetions] How profile affect glusterfs performance?

On 06/07/2017 02:41 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: Hi Yuan, On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:14 PM, liuy...@cmss.chinamobile.com > wrote: Hi Pranith, First of all, we owe you

Re: [Gluster-devel] Performance experiments with io-stats translator

Nice work! What is the network interconnect bandwidth? How much of the network bandwidth is in use while the test is being run? Wondering if there is saturation in the network layer. -Vijay On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > Hi, > > As part of

[Gluster-devel] Who's using OpenStack Cinder & Gluster? [ Was Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder]

To: Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> <ehar...@redhat.com> > <mailto:ehar...@redhat.com> <ehar...@redhat.com>, Joe > Julian <m...@joejulian.name> <m...@joejulian.name> > <mailto:m...@joejulian.name> <m...@joejulian.name>, Vijay Be

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

up. >> >> Forwarded Message >> Subject: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder >> Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 21:07:27 + >> From: Amye Scavarda <a...@redhat.com> <a...@redhat.com> >> To: Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> <

Re: [Gluster-devel] lock_revocation.t is hanging in regression tests

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017, at 06:30 AM, Raghavendra G wrote: > > marking it bad won't help as even bad tests are run by build system (and > they might hang). > > > This is news to me. Did something change to make it this

[Gluster-devel] Demo slots available in community meeting

Hi All, We have 1-2 slots available in this week's community meeting for demoing anything interesting that you have been working on. Please drop a note here if you are interested in demoing this week. Thanks, Vijay ___ Gluster-devel mailing list

Re: [Gluster-devel] libgfapi access to snapshot volume

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Ankireddypalle Reddy wrote: > Hi, > >Can glusterfs snapshot volume be accessed through libgfapi. > Yes, activated snapshots can be accessed through libgfapi. User serviceable snapshots in Gluster makes use of gfapi to access

Re: [Gluster-devel] DHT xlator, read and write a file during creating a new file

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Tahereh Fattahi wrote: > Hi > > I want to use a file as a counter when I create a file in dht xlator. > I mean, after creating a new file, I want open a file in the same > directory with a special name, read that, update the counter and

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is anyone else having trouble authenticating with review.gluster.org over ssh?

h On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > This should be fixed now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh > ow_bug.cgi?id=1442672 > Thank you Nigel. > > > Vijay, can you link me to your failed Jenkins job? Jenkins should have > been able to clone since it uses the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is anyone else having trouble authenticating with review.gluster.org over ssh?

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Raghavendra Talur > wrote: > > I am not able to login even after specifying the key file > > > > $ ssh -T -vvv -i ~/.ssh/gluster raghavendra-ta...@git.gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Device or resource busy when runltp cleanup test-files

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Kinglong Mee wrote: > Yes, this one is silly rename, > > >>> rm: cannot remove ‘/mnt/nfs/ltp-JEYAuky2dz/.nfsaa46457a6a72f8ea14f5’: > Device or resource busy > > But, the other one isn't client's silly rename, > > rm: cannot

Re: [Gluster-devel] performance test and a spacial workload

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Tahereh Fattahi wrote: > Hi > I want to create a performance test with a special workload: > 1. create a file in a directory > 2. setxattr on the directory of the previous file > I could not merge this two in glister code and could not find

Re: [Gluster-devel] Read-only option for a replicated (replication for fail-over) Gluster volume

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Mackay, Michael wrote: > I’ve updated my patch to work for glusterfs 3.10.0. I thought that > targeting the latest stable baseline would be best. > > > > Could I ask for a starting point to submit the change? I see a place to > submit a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Translator issue: Change content of iovec

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:38 AM, David Spisla wrote: > Dear GlusterDevels, > > > > I am coding a translator which is changing the content of the iovec if a > user wants to read the content of the original file. Imagine you have a > simple text file with the content

Re: [Gluster-devel] xlator specific mount options

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ankireddypalle Reddy wrote: > Hi, > >Is there a framework to specify options during volume mount and > then the Xlator use those mount options. > > > > > You can use --xlator-option with mount.glusterfs to specify option(s) for a

Re: [Gluster-devel] How can add one fop after another fop?

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Tahereh Fattahi wrote: > Thanks for your answer. > For example I want to save the number of files in directory as one > extended attribute. > After every create operation, this number should be added and set as > attribute, So after create

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" > > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > > Cc: "Amar Tumballi" , "GlusterFS

Re: [Gluster-devel] Read-only option for a replicated (replication for fail-over) Gluster volume

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Mackay, Michael wrote: > Thanks for the help and advice so far. It’s difficult at times to > describe what the use case is, so I’ll try here. > > > > We need to make sure that no one can write to the physical volume in any > way. We want to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Consistent time attributes (ctime, atime and mtime) across replica set and distribution set

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > >> >> >> On 03/16/2017 02:27 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 03/15/2017 11:31 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote: >>> Hi Rafi,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the lifecycle

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi > wrote: > >> I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want >> clarity on few things: >> >> 1. Does maintainers

[Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

Hi All, We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the lifecycle management of Gluster maintainers more structured. We intend to make the proposal effective around 3.11 (May 2016). Please review the proposal and let us know your feedback. If you need clarity on any existing aspect or

Re: [Gluster-devel] Demo in community meetings

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2017 07:10 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > >> Thanks for the opportunity. >> >> I will be happy to stream a demo on 'howto gluster-block' tomorrow. >> >> -- >> Prasa

Re: [Gluster-devel] Demo in community meetings

On 03/14/2017 07:10 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: Thanks for the opportunity. I will be happy to stream a demo on 'howto gluster-block' tomorrow. -- Prasanna On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: Hi All, In the last meeting of maintainers, we dis

Re: [Gluster-devel] Demo in community meetings

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > Thanks for the opportunity. > > I will be happy to stream a demo on 'howto gluster-block' tomorrow. > Thank you, Prasanna. We will have the demo streamed at [1]. Regards, Vijay [1] https://bluejeans.com/102845329

Re: [Gluster-devel] Untriaged FB-Forwardport bugs

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > It seems that there are 50+ new bugs reported with the 'private bug' > feature 'development whiteboard' set to FB-Forwardport. All of these > bugs are filed against the 'core' component, which is clearly wrong

Re: [Gluster-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-burn-in #2734

Hey All, A patch [1] that I pushed to master on behalf of Shreyas has caused our regression burn-in tests to fail over the weekend. There is another patch from Shreyas [2] that fixes the problem and is currently awaiting votes from CentOS & NetBSD regressions. My bad that we did not end up

Re: [Gluster-devel] Solaris support ?

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Hi, > > I see that we still have solaris code in the repo, and I was wondering > if we should either: > - drop it, because solaris is likely dead > > - start to at least verify compilation there, and so need to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Creating new options for multiple gluster versions

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: > Hi Atin, > > On 31/01/17 05:45, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Xavier Hernandez > > wrote: >> >> Hi Atin, >> >> On

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster Community Meeting 2016-02-01

Adding URL for meeting pad. On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a reminder for tomorrows community meeting. The meeting is > scheduled to be held in #gluster-meeting on Freenode at 1500UTC. > > Please add your updates for the last two

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster tiering maintainer

Hi Dan, Thank you for your contributions to Gluster as a maintainer! Look forward to your continued participation in the community. I am working on a plan for tiering going forward and will share details in the few days. Good luck for your future endeavors! Best, Vijay On Tue, Jan 24, 2017

Re: [Gluster-devel] Priority based ping packet for 3.10

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > The more relevant question would be with TCP_KEEPALIVE and > TCP_USER_TIMEOUT > > on sockets, do we really need ping-pong framework in Clients? We might > need > > that in transport/rdma setups, but my question is

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Gerrit Downtime

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Shyam wrote: > On 01/21/2017 03:10 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >> The migration is now finally complete. Apologies for the delay in >> completion. >> Here's what's happened: >> >> * We've moved Gerrit onto a new VM with CentOS

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusto tests now work upstream fully

Thanks to all of you for getting to this milestone! Look forward to further milestones with glusto! Cheers, Vijay On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hi folks, > > Thanks to some fantastic work by Ashish, Anoop, and Xavi, we now have > Glusto > tests

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Focus Area] Gluster Experience for Developers and Integrations (GEDI)

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:22:16PM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal:: Statedump for libgfapi

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:28:43AM +0530, Rajesh Joseph wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Shyam wrote: > > > On 12/12/2016 12:26 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > >> > > >> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Focus Area] Gluster Experience for Developers and Integrations (GEDI)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > We would like to make it as easy as possible for other projects to get > in touch with the GEDI team. For that, we propose a mailinglist > (integrat...@gluster.org) dedicated for engineers that are involved in >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal : Gluster Block Storage CLI Integration

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Shyam wrote: > On 12/21/2016 09:15 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > >> [Top posting] >> >> I agree with Niels and Shyam here. We are now trying to decouple the >> gluster-block cli from gluster cli. >> Since anyway it doesn't depend on core

  1   2   3   4   5   >