On 01/11/2016 01:00 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 01/09/2016 12:34 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 01/08/2016 08:18 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
I think we just need to come up with rules for considering a
platform to have voting ability before merging the patch.
I totally agree,
On 01/09/2016 12:34 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 01/08/2016 08:18 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
I think we just need to come up with rules for considering a
platform to have voting ability before merging the patch.
I totally agree, except for the "just" part. ;) IMO a platform is much
On 01/08/2016 08:18 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
I think we just need to come up with rules for considering a
platform to have voting ability before merging the patch.
I totally agree, except for the "just" part. ;) IMO a platform is much
like a feature in terms of requiring
g>, "gluster-infra"
<gluster-in...@gluster.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 11:51:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-infra] [Gluster-devel] NetBSD tests not running to
completion.
The same issue keeps coming up every few months, where all patch
acceptances comes to a grinding halt
On 01/07/2016 02:39 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 05:49:04PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
I re triggered NetBSD regressions for http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13041/3
but they are being run in silent mode and are not completing. Can some one
from the infra-team take a look?
devel@gluster.org>, "gluster-infra"
> <gluster-in...@gluster.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 1:53:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] NetBSD tests not running to
> completion.
>
> I have been always with this approach right f
