7 6:37:00 PM
To: gluster-us...@gluster.org; Gluster Devel
Subject: [Gluster-users] Don't allow data loss via add-brick (was Re: Add
single server)
On 04/30/2017 01:13 AM, lemonni...@ulrar.net wrote:
>> So I was a little but luck. If I has all the hardware part, probably i
>> would be f
2017-05-03 14:22 GMT+02:00 Atin Mukherjee :
> Fix is up @ https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17160/ . The only thing which
> we'd need to decide (and are debating on) is that should we bypass this
> validation with rebalance start force or not. What do others think?
This is a
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Nithya Balachandran
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2 May 2017 at 16:59, Shyam wrote:
> >>
> >> Talur,
> >>
> >> Please wait for this fix before
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote:
>
>
> On 2 May 2017 at 16:59, Shyam wrote:
>>
>> Talur,
>>
>> Please wait for this fix before releasing 3.10.2.
>>
>> We will take in the change to either prevent add-brick in
>>
On 2 May 2017 at 16:59, Shyam wrote:
> Talur,
>
> Please wait for this fix before releasing 3.10.2.
>
> We will take in the change to either prevent add-brick in
> sharded+distrbuted volumes, or throw a warning and force the use of --force
> to execute this.
>
> IIUC, the
Talur,
Please wait for this fix before releasing 3.10.2.
We will take in the change to either prevent add-brick in
sharded+distrbuted volumes, or throw a warning and force the use of
--force to execute this.
Let's get a bug going, and not wait for someone to report it in
bugzilla, and also
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> Yeah it is a good idea. I asked him to raise a bug and we can move forward
> with it.
>
+Raghavendra/Nitya who can help with the fix.
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Joe Julian