On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:25:01AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > > > The reason cherry-pick was chosen was to keep the branch linear and
> > > > avoid merge-commits as (I'm guessing here) this makes the tree hard
> to
> > > >
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:25:01AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > > The reason cherry-pick was chosen was to keep the branch linear and
> > > avoid merge-commits as (I'm guessing here) this makes the tree hard to
> > > follow.
> > > Merge-if-necessary will not keep the branch linear. I'm not sure
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:33:55PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah
> >>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Regarding the enforcement of the
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:03:18PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Regarding the enforcement of the dependencies
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Regarding the enforcement of the dependencies while merging, i see that
>> the dependent patches on any patch is mentioned
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Regarding the enforcement of the dependencies while merging, i see that
> the dependent patches on any patch is mentioned in the "Related Changes"
> column [1]. It still doesn't enforce, in the