Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:43:06PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > Just need a clarification. Does a "commit in the last 90 days" means > > > merging a patch sent by someone else by maintainer or maintainer sending a > > > patch to be merged? > > > > Your email needs to either be in Reviewed-By or

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:42:22PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:18:05PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:18:05PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. > > We've > > only added people. For security

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. > We've > only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the > following: > > If you do not have a commit in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. > We've > only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the > following: > > If you do not have a commit in

[Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

Hello folks, We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. We've only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the following: If you do not have a commit in the last 90 days, your membership from gluster-maintainers team on Gerrit will be