Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

vendra...@gmail.com>, "Nithya Balachandran" >>> <nbala...@redhat.com>, anoo...@redhat.com, >>> > "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "Raghavendra Bhat" < >>> raghaven...@redhat.com> >>> &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

aghavendra...@gmail.com>, "Nithya Balachandran" < >> nbala...@redhat.com>, anoo...@redhat.com, >> > "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "Raghavendra Bhat" < >> raghaven...@redhat.com> >> > Sent: Thursday, September 7, 201

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

<gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "Raghavendra Bhat" < > raghaven...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 6:44:51 PM > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985 > > > > From snapview client perspective one important thing to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

bala...@redhat.com>, anoo...@redhat.com, > "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "Raghavendra Bhat" > <raghaven...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 6:44:51 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985 > > Fr

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

dhat.com> > > Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com>, anoo...@redhat.com, > "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, > > raghaven...@redhat.com > > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:52:28 AM > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Ne

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Raghavendra G" <raghavendra...@gmail.com> > > Cc: "Nithya Balachandran" <nbala...@redhat.com>, anoo...@redhat.com, > "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, > > raghaven...@redhat.com > > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

<gluster-devel@gluster.org>, > raghaven...@redhat.com > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 10:23:49 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985 > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Raghavendra G" <raghavendra...@gmail.com> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

<gluster-devel@gluster.org>, > raghaven...@redhat.com > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:52:28 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985 > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbala...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > It has been a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > It has been a while but iirc snapview client (loaded abt dht/tier etc) had > some issues when we ran tiering tests. Rafi might have more info on this - > basically it was expecting to find the inode_ctx populated

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

It has been a while but iirc snapview client (loaded abt dht/tier etc) had some issues when we ran tiering tests. Rafi might have more info on this - basically it was expecting to find the inode_ctx populated but it was not. On 24 August 2017 at 10:13, Raghavendra G

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Note that we need to consider xlators on brick stack too. I've added maintainers/peers of xlators on brick stack. Please explicitly ack/nack whether this patch affects your component. For reference, following are the xlators loaded in brick stack storage/posix features/trash

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Thanks Pranith and Ashish for your inputs. - Original Message - > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > To: "Ashish Pandey" > Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Xavier Hernandez" > , "Gluster Devel" >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Raghavendra, As Ashish mentioned, there aren't any known problems if upper xlators don't send lookups in EC at the moment. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Ashish Pandey wrote: > Raghvendra, > > I have provided my comment on this patch. > I think EC will not have any

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Raghvendra, I have provided my comment on this patch. I think EC will not have any issue with this approach. However, I would welcome comments from Xavi and Pranith too for any side effects which I may not be able to foresee. Ashish - Original Message - From: "Raghavendra

[Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

Hi Ashish, Following are the blockers for making a decision on whether patch [1] can be merged or not: * Evaluation of dentry operations (like rename etc) in dht * Whether EC works fine if a non-lookup fop (like open(dir), stat, chmod etc) hits EC without a single lookup performed on file/inode