[Gluster-devel] Official word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?

2014-10-30 Thread B.K.Raghuram
I just wanted to check if gluster replace brick commit force is officially deprecated in 3.6? Is there any other way to do a planned replace of just one of the bricks in a replica pair? Add/remove brick requires that new bricks be added in replica count multiples which may not be always

Re: [Gluster-devel] Official word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?

2014-10-30 Thread Kaushal M
'replace-brick commit force' is still going to be available. It's just that data-migration for replace-brick is going to be removed. So 'replace-brick (start|stop)' are going to be deprecated. To replace a brick in a replica set, you'll need to do a 'replace-brick commit force'. Self-healing will

[Gluster-devel] Official word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?

2014-10-30 Thread Raghuram BK
I just wanted to check if gluster replace brick commit force is officially deprecated in 3.6? Is there any other way to do a planned replace of just one of the bricks in a replica pair? Add/remove brick requires that new bricks be added in replica count multiples which may not be always

Re: [Gluster-devel] Official word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?

2014-10-30 Thread Joe Julian
Which means, of course, no redundancy until that self heal is completed. Furthermore, replace-brick start stopped working at all some versions ago so the removal of start and stop may as well just happen. On October 30, 2014 12:41:17 AM PDT, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote: 'replace-brick