Re: [Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

2016-09-06 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > wrote: > > > Do you think it makes sense to do post-mortem of features that > didn't > > make it to 3.9.0? We

Re: [Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

2016-09-06 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > Do you think it makes sense to do post-mortem of features that didn't > make it to 3.9.0? We have some features that missed deadlines twice as well, > i.e. planned for 3.8.0 and didn't make it and planned

[Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

2016-09-06 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
hi, Do you think it makes sense to do post-mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0? We have some features that missed deadlines twice as well, i.e. planned for 3.8.0 and didn't make it and planned for 3.9.0 and didn't make it. So may be we are adding features to roadmap without