Re: [Gluster-devel] Progress on brick multiplexing

Cool On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > Just went through the commit message. I think similar to attaching if we > also > > have detaching, then we can simulate killing of bricks in afr using this > > approach may be? > > Yes, that's pretty much the plan.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Progress on brick multiplexing

> Just went through the commit message. I think similar to attaching if we also > have detaching, then we can simulate killing of bricks in afr using this > approach may be? Yes, that's pretty much the plan. Some work to add the new RPC and handler, a bit more to make the test libraries use it

Re: [Gluster-devel] Progress on brick multiplexing

Just went through the commit message. I think similar to attaching if we also have detaching, then we can simulate killing of bricks in afr using this approach may be? Even remove brick can do the same I guess. On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > For those

[Gluster-devel] Progress on brick multiplexing

For those who don't know, "brick multiplexing" is a term some of us have been using to mean running multiple brick "stacks" inside a single process with a single protocol/server instance. Discussion from a month or so ago is here: