On 04/02/2015 06:43 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 2 Apr 2015, at 14:08, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:21:57PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
On 31 Mar 2015, at 08:15, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:20:19PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
On 31 Mar 2015, at 08:15, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:20:19PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
IMHO, doing hardening and security should be left the individual
distributions and the package maintainers. Generally, each distribution has
it's own policies with regards
Hi,
Sorry for the top-post. Just to Amplify a but if what Niels has already
said——
Yes, in Fedora, the glusterfs.spec file has a line
%global _hardened_build 1
at the top. This enables PIE and RELRO in Fedora and EPEL builds.
This line exists in the glusterfs.spec.in file in the Gluster
On 04/02/2015 08:22 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the top-post. Just to Amplify a but if what Niels...
Just to Amplify a bit of what Niels
(Naughty fingers.)
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:21:57PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
On 31 Mar 2015, at 08:15, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:20:19PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
IMHO, doing hardening and security should be left the individual
distributions and the package
I've got responses from couple of folks, would also love hear from others.
~Atin
On 03/31/2015 11:49 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
Folks,
There are some projects which uses compiler/glibc features to strengthen
the security claims. Popular distros suggest to harden daemon with
RELRO/PIE flags.
On 03/31/2015 12:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:20:19PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
IMHO, doing hardening and security should be left the individual
distributions and the package maintainers. Generally, each distribution has
it's own policies with regards to hardening and
On 2 Apr 2015, at 14:08, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:21:57PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
On 31 Mar 2015, at 08:15, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:20:19PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
IMHO, doing hardening and security should be
IMHO, doing hardening and security should be left the individual
distributions and the package maintainers. Generally, each distribution has
it's own policies with regards to hardening and security. We as an upstream
project cannot decide on what a distribution should do. But we should be
ready to
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:20:19PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
IMHO, doing hardening and security should be left the individual
distributions and the package maintainers. Generally, each distribution has
it's own policies with regards to hardening and security. We as an upstream
project cannot
10 matches
Mail list logo
