Re: [Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

2014-06-11 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 06/11/2014 10:45 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 06/11/2014 09:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 06/11/2014 08:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I think we should revert it and raise a bug so that it can be

Re: [Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

2014-06-11 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 06/11/2014 11:18 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 06/11/2014 10:45 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 06/11/2014 09:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 06/11/2014 08:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I think

Re: [Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

2014-06-11 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:58:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:31:04PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 06/11/2014 10:45 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 06/11/2014 09:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 06/11/2014 08:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

2014-06-11 Thread Justin Clift
On 11/06/2014, at 9:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: snip I have seen dd being in uninterruptible sleep on b.g.o. There are also instances [1] where anon-fd-nfs has run for close to 6000+ seconds. This definitely points to the nfs deadlock. A few of the rackspace regression runs seem to be getting

Re: [Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

2014-06-11 Thread Justin Clift
On 12/06/2014, at 12:12 AM, Justin Clift wrote: On 11/06/2014, at 9:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: snip I have seen dd being in uninterruptible sleep on b.g.o. There are also instances [1] where anon-fd-nfs has run for close to 6000+ seconds. This definitely points to the nfs deadlock. A few

[Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

2014-06-10 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
hi, I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I think we should revert it and raise a bug so that it can be fixed and committed again along with the fix. Pranith ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

2014-06-10 Thread Harshavardhana
Agreed! +1 On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com wrote: hi, I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I think we should revert it and raise a bug so that it can be fixed and committed again along with the fix. Pranith