yeah +1 from me too.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Mohit Agrawal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just checking of posix_getxattr code to debug of my one problem.I
> have found scope of improvement in
> this function to execute system call in better way.As of now
>
On 05/15/2017 05:26 AM, Mohit Agrawal wrote:
Hi,
I was just checking of posix_getxattr code to debug of my one
problem.I have found scope of improvement in
this function to execute system call in better way.As of now
function(posix_getxattr) is calling system
calls (sys_lgetxattr) two
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Mohit Agrawal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just checking of posix_getxattr code to debug of my one problem.I
> have found scope of improvement in
> this function to execute system call in better way.As of now
> function(posix_getxattr) is
Hi,
I was just checking of posix_getxattr code to debug of my one problem.I
have found scope of improvement in
this function to execute system call in better way.As of now
function(posix_getxattr) is calling system
calls (sys_lgetxattr) two times to get the value of xattr or in case of
list