On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 04:04:02PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
>> I'm currently trying to straighten out the encrypted transport
>> (SSL/TLS socket) code, and make it more robust, and work well with
>> IPv6 in particular [1].
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Sachidananda URS wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently trying to straighten out the encrypted transport
>> (SSL/TLS socket) code, and make it more robust, and work well with
>> IPv6
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 04:04:02PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> I'm currently trying to straighten out the encrypted transport
> (SSL/TLS socket) code, and make it more robust, and work well with
> IPv6 in particular [1]. When testing the changes, the mount.glusterfs
> script cause some troubles.
>
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> I'm currently trying to straighten out the encrypted transport
> (SSL/TLS socket) code, and make it more robust, and work well with
> IPv6 in particular [1]. When testing the changes, the mount.glusterfs
> script cause some
I'm currently trying to straighten out the encrypted transport
(SSL/TLS socket) code, and make it more robust, and work well with
IPv6 in particular [1]. When testing the changes, the mount.glusterfs
script cause some troubles.
The mount script tries to check if the mount is online by performing