On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/29/2015 06:56 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/29/2015 06:10 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:06:43PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
- If there are tests that cannot be
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 Vijay Bellur wrote:
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 03:40 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
I just updated
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures with the latest
spurious failures we saw in linux and NetBSD regressions. Could you guys
update
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 03:40 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
I just updated
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures with the latest
spurious failures we saw in linux and NetBSD regressions. Could you guys
update with any more spurious regressions that you guys are
hi,
I just updated
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures with the latest
spurious failures we saw in linux and NetBSD regressions. Could you guys
update with any more spurious regressions that you guys are observing
but not listed on the pad. Could you guys help in
I have updated tiering related spurious failures to proper state.
Regards
Rafi KC
On 07/29/2015 03:40 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
I just updated
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures with the
latest spurious failures we saw in linux and NetBSD regressions.
On 07/29/2015 06:10 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:06:43PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
- If there are tests that cannot be fixed easily in the near term, we move
such tests to a different folder or drop such test units.
A tests/disabled directory seemsthe way to go.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:06:43PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
- If there are tests that cannot be fixed easily in the near term, we move
such tests to a different folder or drop such test units.
A tests/disabled directory seemsthe way to go. But before going there,
the test maintaniner should
