On 05/02/2015 10:14 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
If glusterd itself fails to come up, of course the test will fail :-). Is it
still happening?
Pranith,
Did you get a chance to see glusterd logs and find why glusterd didn't come up?
Please paste the relevant logs in this thread.
No :-(.
On 05/02/2015 08:17 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
As per the etherpad:
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
* tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 64 Failed: 35)
* Failed tests: 1-6, 11, 20-30, 33-34, 36, 41, 50-61, 64
* Happens in
If glusterd itself fails to come up, of course the test will fail :-). Is it
still happening?
Pranith,
Did you get a chance to see glusterd logs and find why glusterd didn't come up?
Please paste the relevant logs in this thread.
___
Gluster-devel
hi,
As per the etherpad:
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
* tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 64 Failed: 35)
* Failed tests: 1-6, 11, 20-30, 33-34, 36, 41, 50-61, 64
* Happens in master (Mon 30th March - git commit id
