On 06/12/2014 11:13 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com
mailto:vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/12/2014 06:52 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
Hi Vijay,
Since glusterfs 3.5, posix_lookup() sends ESTALE instead of
ENOENT
On 2014-06-17 18:47, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-06-17 17:49, Shyamsundar Ranganathan wrote:
You maybe looking at the problem being fixed here, [1].
On a lookup attribute mismatch was not being healed across
directories, and this patch attempts to address the same. Currently
the version
Hi all,
Just a small heads up. We're pushing back the GlusterFS Feature Freeze
date by two weeks.
This lets us focus on fixing bugs in 3.5 that have been reported recently,
so people don't have to burn themselves out developing 3.6 features in a
massive rush at the same time. ;)
Regards and
On 06/16/2014 09:08 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/16/2014 09:00 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
I see that most of the tests are doing umount and these may fail
sometimes because of EBUSY etc. I am wondering if we should change all
of them to umount -l.
Let me know if you foresee any
