On 07/21/2014 02:08 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 07/19/2014 08:58 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/19/2014 11:25 AM, Andrew Lau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com mailto:pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/18/2014 05:43 PM,
On 07/21/2014 05:03 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-19 04:43, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/18/2014 07:57 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
During testing of a 3*4 gluster (from master as of yesterday), I encountered
two major weirdnesses:
1. A 'rm -rf some_dir' needed several
On 2014-07-21 13:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 05:03 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-19 04:43, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/18/2014 07:57 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
During testing of a 3*4 gluster (from master as of yesterday), I
encountered
two major
On 07/21/2014 05:17 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-21 13:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 05:03 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-19 04:43, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/18/2014 07:57 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
During testing of a 3*4 gluster (from master
On 2014-07-21 13:49, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 05:17 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-21 13:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 05:03 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-19 04:43, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/18/2014 07:57 PM, Anders Blomdell
On Monday 21 July 2014 13:53:19 Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-21 13:49, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 05:17 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-21 13:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 05:03 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-19 04:43, Pranith Kumar
On 21/07/2014, at 11:03 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
Is it possible to run a single regression test on Jenkins (preferably
from a suitably crafted rfc, in order not to clutter BZ with random
noise [i.e. my feeble test-cases])?
H, with a bit of mucking around, that can be done. You've got
On 07/19/2014 08:58 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/19/2014 11:25 AM, Andrew Lau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com mailto:pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/18/2014 05:43 PM, Andrew Lau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014
On 19-Jul-2014 11:06 pm, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 08:23:29AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Guys,
Does anyone know why device-id can be different even though it
is all single xfs filesystem?
We see the following log in the brick-log.
On 2014-07-20 16:01, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Luis Pabón wrote:
Hi all,
A few months ago, the unit test framework based on cmockery2 was
in the repo for a little while, then removed while we improved the
packaging method. Now support for cmockery2 (
SRC:
http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5.2beta1.tar.gz
This release is made off jenkins-release-84
-- Gluster Build System
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
From what I can tell I incorrectly assumed that I was seeing a problem
deleting directories as described in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121347#c4
This is definitely different than Anders is seeing in the duplicate entries
email thread. Should I close my original issue and
On 07/21/2014 07:33 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-21 14:36, Soumya Koduri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 05:35 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2014 13:53:19 Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-07-21 13:49, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 05:17 PM, Anders Blomdell
The cmockery2 rpm is only available for the current supported Fedora versions
which currently are 19 and 20.
Have you tried installing cmockery2 from the source?
Luis
-Original Message-
From: Santosh Pradhan [sprad...@redhat.com]
Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 10:45AM
To: Luis Pabón
Niels you are correct. Let me take a look.
Luis
-Original Message-
From: Niels de Vos [nde...@redhat.com]
Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 10:41AM
To: Luis Pabon [lpa...@redhat.com]
CC: Anders Blomdell [anders.blomd...@control.lth.se]; gluster-devel@gluster.org
Subject: Re:
Cmockery2 is a hard dependency before GlusterFS can be compiled in
upstream master now - we could make it conditional
and enable if necessary? since we know we do not have the cmockery2
packages available on all systems?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Luis Pabon lpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Niels
On 2014-07-21 19:14, Jeff Darcy wrote:
But this offset gap widens as and when more translators (which need
to store subvol-id) get added to the gluster stack which may
eventually result in the similar issue which you are facing now.
Perhaps it's time to revisit the idea of making assumptions
The Fifth Elephant is a Big Data and Analytics conference on 23-26 July
2014 in Bangalore, India.
https://fifthelephant.in/2014/conference
We are proud to support the folks there, and they have extended a 10%
discount to the GlusterFS Community. Ticket purchase URL:
On 07/21/2014 05:09 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/21/2014 02:08 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 07/19/2014 08:58 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/19/2014 11:25 AM, Andrew Lau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com
Yes, it is a simple bug. I filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121822 , thank you very
much for finding this Anders. I have sent a fix.
- Luis
On 07/21/2014 01:16 PM, Luis Pabon wrote:
Niels you are correct. Let me take a look.
Luis
-Original Message-
From: Niels
20 matches
Mail list logo
