Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-08-01 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > As part of get-state enhancements efforts, primary the requirements coming > from tendrl project, Samikshan is working on the patch get the geo-rep > session details included in it. This is the only patch which is

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-31 Thread Atin Mukherjee
As part of get-state enhancements efforts, primary the requirements coming from tendrl project, Samikshan is working on the patch get the geo-rep session details included in it. This is the only patch which is pending atm. @Samikshan - can we please put the patch up for review by tomorrow so that

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-30 Thread Hari Gowtham
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 07/25/2017 02:56 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: >> >> >> >> Further changes: >>- No new milestone assigned, IOW not moved to 4.0 by default, >> hence contributors working on these features would need to

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-28 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
On 07/23/2017 01:01 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote: Responses inline. On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Shyam > wrote: - posix: provide option to handle 'statfs()' properly when more than 1 brick is exported from 1 node -

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-28 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
On 07/25/2017 02:56 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: Further changes: - No new milestone assigned, IOW not moved to 4.0 by default, hence contributors working on these features would need to rekindle conversations on including the same in 4.0 on the ML or on the issue itself.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-28 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
On 07/24/2017 09:56 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Shyam > wrote: - Implement parallel writes feature on EC volume - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/251

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-28 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
On 07/24/2017 03:56 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: - Decide what to do with glfs_ipc() in libgfapi -https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/269 - @nixpanic I assume there is more than just test case disabling for this, is this expected to happen by 3.12? https://review.gluster.org/17854 has

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-25 Thread Amar Tumballi
> > Further changes: > - No new milestone assigned, IOW not moved to 4.0 by default, hence > contributors working on these features would need to rekindle conversations > on including the same in 4.0 on the ML or on the issue itself. > > I would like us to push the changes for 'tiering' which

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-24 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Shyam wrote: > Hi, > > Prepare for a lengthy mail, but needed for the 3.12 release branching, so > here is a key to aid the impatient, > > Key: > 1) If you asked for an exception to a feature (meaning delayed backport to > 3.12 branch post

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-24 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 04:06:58PM -0400, Shyam wrote: > Hi, > > Prepare for a lengthy mail, but needed for the 3.12 release branching, so > here is a key to aid the impatient, > > Key: > 1) If you asked for an exception to a feature (meaning delayed backport to > 3.12 branch post branching for

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

2017-07-23 Thread Amar Tumballi
Responses inline. On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Shyam wrote: > > > - posix: provide option to handle 'statfs()' properly when more than 1 > brick is exported from 1 node > - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/241 > - @amarts patch is still awaiting reviews,