Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Dropping nightly build from download.gluster.org ?

wnload.gluster.org/pub/gluster/ ) > > > > > -- > Michael Scherer > Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS > > > > _______ > Gluster-infra mailing list > gluster-in...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailma

Re: [Gluster-devel] Could we not always call lookup for root_dir in fuse_getattr to improve performance?

> I have been trying to deal with this for many days. Your help is greatly > in need. > > > > Best regards, > Zhitao Li > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster volume snapshot - Plugin architecture proposal

s to be part of the discussion too. Lets take this forward. -Amar On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Rajesh Joseph <joseph.raj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 22, 2017 8:00 PM, <sri...@marirs.net.in> wrote: > > Hi Amar, > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017, at 04:26 AM, Amar Tumbal

Re: [Gluster-devel] Read-only option for a replicated (replication for fail-over) Gluster volume

gt; your volume read-only for all clients accessing it: > > # gluster volume set features.read-only on > > Hope that helped. > > ~ Samikshan > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > -- > > > > ~ Atin (atinm) > > > > ___ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Could we not always call lookup for root_dir in fuse_getattr to improve performance?

ing the nodeid==1 check > directly. > > > Thank you! > > Best regards, > Zhitao Li > -- > *From:* Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> > *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 9:13:35 PM > *To:* Zhitao Li > *Cc:* Niels de Vos; Poornima Gurusiddaiah; Gl

Re: [Gluster-devel] Consistent time attributes (ctime, atime and mtime) across replica set and distribution set

time genrated by fuse. So I think this is fine. >> > > Okay. But since self-heal and snapview-server (atleast) seem to be using > gfapi, how can gfapi differentiate between these internal clients and other > applications (like NFS/SMB)? I thought we need intelligence on server-side > to identify such clients

Re: [Gluster-devel] About inode table: client, server and inconsistency

n consistency. Hope that answers the question. -Amar > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts)

Re: [Gluster-devel] auth-allow feature is broken in 3.10

ster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] [RFC] fop usage metrics across the filesystem

I have opened a github issues about this @ https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/137 Would recommend people to comment on the thread there so we can have a better conversation on the topic, and also keep track of whats happening. Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster volume snapshot - Plugin architecture proposal

> > > > > > > > > > > > Google Docs: Create and edit documents online. > Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA > You have received this email because someone shared a document with you > from Google Docs. > [im

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: Impact of direct-io-mode on mail-box work load

anyone first tried mailbox related workload with glusterfs, and seems 2008 is the answer [1] :-) Regards, Amar [1] - http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?24551 > -- > Thanks, > > Bipin Kunal > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list >

Re: [Gluster-devel] bug-1421590-brick-mux-reuse-ports.t failure

sic/gfapi/glfs_sysrq.t - 7 second >>> ./tests/basic/gfapi/gfapi-trunc.t - 7 second >>> ./tests/basic/gfapi/gfapi-async-calls-test.t - 7 second >>> ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug-1241104.t - 7 second >>> ./tests/basic/fops-sanity.t - 7 second >>>

Re: [Gluster-devel] GFID2 - Proposal to add extra byte to existing GFID

Comments inline. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: > On 12/19/2016 07:57 AM, Aravinda wrote: > >> >> regards >> Aravinda >> >> On 12/16/2016 05:47 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: >> >>> On 12/16/2016 08:31 AM, Aravinda wrote: >>> Proposal to add

Re: [Gluster-devel] About locking subvolume in dht translator

gt; NULL); > > (in dht_blocking_inodelk_rec function )raise error. > Mostly because its a file and inode context is not present on all the subvols? > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.o

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] [gluster-devel][gluster-users] Usability Initiative for Gluster: Documentation

w of documentation is not great, hence took more time to get to the documentation. Hope to see them fixed. Thanks, Amar > Thanks! > - amye > > -- > Amye Scavarda | a...@redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead > > ___ > Gluster-users m

Re: [Gluster-devel] Consistent time attributes (ctime, atime and mtime) across replica set and distribution set

son, for ex: because of locks. > > > > > > 2) On the server posix layer stores the value in the memory (inode ctx) > > and will sync the data periodically to the disk as an extended attr > > I believe this should not be a part of the posix xlator. our posix store > definition is that it uses a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Need Feedback] Monitoring

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Michael Scherer <msche...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Le mardi 13 juin 2017 à 11:14 -0400, Amar Tumballi a écrit : >> > All, >> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/quota/bug-1292020.t getting hung

sewhere. > need to see if it has anything to do with cjange in quotad graph. > We get through this by just doing EXPECT_WITHIN imo > > > > On Aug 2, 2017 23:11, "Amar Tumballi" <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> The same test is getting hung with subdir mo

[Gluster-devel] Proposed Protocol changes for 4.0: Need feedback.

them as a single patch (or multiple dependent, granular patches) on master when we feel it is ready. Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Question regarding to gluster and vfs

't make out much: Probably something to do with Solaris support IMO. [1] - https://github.com/gluster/historic/commit/3176ddf99f701412bd799cc730afd598c2a13e39 May be time to run a test by removing that line as we are friendly with only Linux/BSD right now. Regards, Amar > Thanks, > Raghavendra Talur > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] create restrictions xlator

that I got problems when LV is used fully. >>>> >>>> this patch is in the middle of develop. >>>> >>>> just I want to know whether my approach is pretty correct to satisfy my >>>> requirement. >>>> >>>

[Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

I am updating the same content in github, so feel free to comment there too). NOTE: I thought of using ':' (colon) as field separator between addr_list and subdir entry, but with IPv6 ':' is valid character in string. Hence using ' ='. -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:11:29PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was working on subdir mount for fuse clients [1], and was able to > handle > > pieces just fi

Re: [Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 08:25:23PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 0

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > All, > > Thanks for participating actively in the discussions. With all your > co-operation we now have a update on maintainers 2.0 proposal. Vijay Bellur > sent a patch last week [1] capturin

Re: [Gluster-devel] Changing the relative order of read-ahead and open-behind

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Raghavendra G <raghaven...@gluster.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa < >> rgo

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

sing the tasks. [11] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/175 [12] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-July/053359.html > [1] Review focus: https://review.gluster.org/#/q > /starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) _

Re: [Gluster-devel] Changing the relative order of read-ahead and open-behind

> > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > Raghavendra G > > > > _

Re: [Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 08:25:23PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

_____ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Compilation with gcc 7.x

luster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusto failures with dispersed volumes + Samba

console >> > >> > >> > ___ >> > Gluster-devel mailing list >> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > > > -- > Pranith > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] upstream regression suite is broken

_ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11: Pending features and reviews (2 days to branching)

tps://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/projects/1 > > [2] Reviews needing attention: https://review.gluster.org/#/q > /status:open+starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] finding and fixing memory leaks in xlators

), 1, gf_meta_mt_priv_t); > 232 if (!priv) > 233 return -1; > 234 > 235 GF_OPTION_INIT ("meta-dir-name", priv->meta_dir_name, str, > out); > 236 > 237 this->private = priv; > 23

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/quota/bug-1292020.t getting hung

t; regression getting aborted. The latest victim is >> https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/5696/console . >> >> ~Atin >> > > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@g

Re: [Gluster-devel] Review request - patch #15036

gt;> successful? >> >> [1] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15036/ >> >> regards, >> Raghavendra >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >

Re: [Gluster-devel] GFID2 - Proposal to add extra byte to existing GFID

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Amar Tumballi <ama...@gmail.com> wrote: > Comments inline. > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Xavier Hernandez <xhernan...@datalab.es> > wrote: > >> On 12/19/2016 07:57 AM, Aravinda wrote: >> >>> >>> re

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggestion to optimize posix_getxattr call

just the size later. -Amar Please share your input on this, appreciate your input. > > Regards > Mohit Agrawal > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-de

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

t cumbersome to > browse through the thread on mailing list compared to github IMHO. > > -- > Pranith > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/li

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

/review.gluster.org/17480 > > [4] Release calendar: https://www.gluster.org/community/release-schedule/ > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) __

[Gluster-devel] New 'experimental' branch created for validating your ideas

added in memory allocation checks. - All the above can be seen with sending SIGUSR2 signal to GlusterFS process. (@ /tmp/glusterfs.* ) Regards, Amar [1] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2017-May/002644.html -- Amar Tumballi (amarts

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

yam/Kaushal >> >> [1] Release bug tracker: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.1 >> >> [2] 3.11 review dashboard: >> https://review.gluster.org/#/projects/glusterfs,dashboards/d >> ashboard:3-11-d

Re: [Gluster-devel] brick multiplexing and memory consumption

umber of processes. I > was in the favor of limiting bricks per process before. > > Makes sense. +1 on this approach from me too. Lets get going with this IMO. -Amar > Thanks, > Raghavendra Talur > > > > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster

[Gluster-devel] Reducing the time to test patches which doesn't modify code

://review.gluster.org/17522 Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] need reviews

___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] New 'experimental' branch created for validating your ideas

t of release branch cut-off). Yet to finalize on that. > And how has the permission to merge the patches in the experimental branch. > > Assuming it is 'who' and not 'how', Currently I (@amarts) have the permission to merge patches. Regards, Amar > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Amar Tumballi

Re: [Gluster-devel] reagarding backport information while porting patches

; Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> >> > Tested-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> >> > NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenk...@build.gluster.org> >> > Reviewed-by: Amar Tumballi <ama...@re

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t fails regression with core

vent-epoll.c:572 >> #16 0x7effcca62470 in event_dispatch_epoll_worker (data=0x215d950) at >> /home/jenkins/root/workspace/centos6-regression/libglusterfs >> /src/event-epoll.c:648 >> #17 0x7effcbcc9aa1 in start_thread () from ./lib64/libpthread.so.0 >> #18 0x7effcb631

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression Voting Changes

gt; RCA. > > > A re-trigger in the hopes of getting a green is no longer acceptable > for > > > release branches. > > > * fstat will soon track the regression-test-burn-in and > > > regression-test-with-multiplex. > > > * As soon as we have the new jobs up, we'll

Re: [Gluster-devel] Adding xxhash to gluster code base

Hash/ > [4] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17488/10 > > > Just one comment at the moment. Please separate out the patches as 1. changes to get xxHash into the project 2. gfid2path feature (which can use xxHash code). That way it will be very easy to review, and also to maintain in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reviews older than 90 days

ttps://hackmd.io/MbBsEMFMCMBYEYC0BOYAzATI2BmD5Fp4B2A5DAVlmgA5hjQATZeIA===# Nigel, how would you want to go about this next? On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > Did get hold of all the pending patches till 2017-05-20 (660 in total). > Note that it in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11: RC1 is tagged!

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/24/2017 02:05 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> Was looking at Milestone in Github: >> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is% >> 3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Release+3.11+%28STM%2

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Meeting 2017-05-24

gt; --- > * kshlm (37) > * ndevos (31) > * JoeJulian (30) > * zodbot (6) > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Volgen support for loading trace and io-stats translators at specific points in the graph

; -Krutika > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reviews older than 90 days

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:28:40AM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Did get hold of all the pending patches till 2017-05-20 (660 in total). > > Note that it includes "All open" patches. > &

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11: Release notes updates!!! (1 day remaining)

> "Releases are made better together" > > :-) -Amar > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] 120k context switches on GlsuterFS nodes

t (the cloud >>> server). On that cloud server the glusterfs process was using quite a lot >>> of system CPU but that server (VM) only has 2 vCPUs so maybe I should >>> increase the number of vCPUs... >>> >>> Any ideas or recommendations? >>> >>&

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11: RC1 is tagged!

>>> these bugs! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shyam >>> >>> [1] Tracker BZ for 3.11.0 blockers: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0 >>> >>> [2] Release notes: >>> https:/

Re: [Gluster-devel] Changes to periodic regression runs

gluster.org/#/c/17145/ > -- > nigelb > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] [Proposal]: Changes to how we test and vote each patch

.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-May/052844.html Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Proposal]: New branch (earlier: Changes to how we test and vote each patch)

its sanity, and keep track of patches which gets in. Let me know what each of you would think. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > All, > > Below is mainly a proposal, and I would like to hear people's thought on > these. > > &

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.12 and 4.0: Thoughts on scope

o take it forward and propose the design changes if needed to be consumed > by external applications (at-least existing ones like NFS-Ganesha or > Samba). Github issue#[3] > > Thanks, > Soumya > > [1] https://github.com/gluster/gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Empty info file preventing glusterd from starting

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:08 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: > We are using 3.7.6 and on link https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279 > status is "can't merge" > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> > wrote

Re: [Gluster-devel] Empty info file preventing glusterd from starting

lel one of the glusterd >>>>> instance in other nodes have been brought down and whole sequence of >>>>> operation happens in a loop. The test case through which you can get into >>>>> this situation is not something you'd hit in production. Please help me to >>>>> understand the urgency here. >>>>> >>>>> Also in one of the earlier thread, I did mention the workaround of >>>>> this issue back to Xin through http://lists.gluster.org/piper >>>>> mail/gluster-users/2017-January/029600.html >>>>> >>>>> "If you end up in having a 0 byte info file you'd need to copy the same >>>>> info file from other node and put it there and restart glusterd" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have found one of the existing case is there and also solution >>>>>>> patch is available but the status of that patch in "cannot merge". Also >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> "info" file is empty and "info.tmp" file present in "lib/glusterd/vol" >>>>>>> directory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Below is the link of the existing case. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279/5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> please let me know what is the plan of community to provide the >>>>>>> solution of this problem and in which version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Abhishek Paliwal >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Abhishek Paliwal >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Abhishek Paliwal >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> Abhishek Paliwal >> > > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Need Feedback] Monitoring

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Michael Scherer <msche...@redhat.com> wrote: > Le mardi 13 juin 2017 à 11:14 -0400, Amar Tumballi a écrit : > > All, > > > > Please update the github issue [1], with what are the metrics you need to > > see periodically. The

[Gluster-devel] [Need Feedback] Monitoring

of what should get in the graph. Regards, Amar [1] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/168 [2] - https://review.gluster.org/17540/ -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org

[Gluster-devel] General Know-how : Volfile DSL

is DSL. (And some thought its Digital Subscriber Line -- as in telephone connection). Hence just pointing everyone to above link, and you can understand more about how volfile is parsed, and it builds its grammar by looking at 'libglusterfs/src/graph.{l,y,c}' Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (

Re: [Gluster-devel] Tests that fail with multiplexing turned on

looked at the second. > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] DHT xlator, read and write a file during creating a new file

n just handle the counter management using 'xattrop' or `setxattr()' fops Regards, Amar > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] fstat problems when killing with stat prefetch turned on

list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing > listGluster-devel@gluster.orghttp://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > &

Re: [Gluster-devel] Adding xxhash to gluster code base

ey can > handle > > > it correctly. Adding an external project to contrib/ should be > mentioned > > > in the release notes at the very least. > > > > > > Note that none of the symbols of any public functions in Gluster may > > > collide with functions in stand

Re: [Gluster-devel] Scripts to help RCA quota accounting issues

t; > > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Client Server incompatibility with Gluster 4.0

perspective? >> > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Client Server incompatibility with Gluster 4.0

from upstream fuse project to utilize more features from there, so for the user, there are lot of reason to upgrade the clients. -Amar On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > Not sure how many of you have gone through the email! As we are done wi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Release 3.12.2 : Scheduled for the 10th of October

> > >> [1] Release bug tracker: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.12.2 > >> > >> [2] 3.10 review dashboard: > >> https://review.gluster.org/#/projects/glusterfs,dashboards/d > ashboard:3-12-dashboard > >> > >> > > > > ___ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > gluster-us...@gluster.org > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/basic/pump.t - what is it used for?

> situation. I'd need some context here to understand the expectation of this > test before doing any modifications. > > ~Atin > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman

Re: [Gluster-devel] Metrics: and how to get them out from gluster

Thanks all for the feedback! On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 12:21 AM, John Strunk <jstr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Disclaimer: This email is long, and did take significant time to write. &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Changing Submit Type on review.gluster.org

rg/Documentation/intro-project- > owner.html#submit-type > [2]: http://gerritstats-demo.firebaseapp.com/ > > -- > nigelb > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar T

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.12: Readiness for release (request attention)

8-26=release-3.12 >> >> [5] 3.12 gerrit dashboard: https://review.gluster.org/#/p >> rojects/glusterfs,dashboards/dashboard:3-12-dashboard >> >> [6] Older upgrade guide: https://gluster.readthedocs.io >> /en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/upgrade_to_3.10/ >> >> [7] gbench test: https://github.com/gluster/gbe >> nch/blob/master/bench-tests/bt--0001/GlusterBench.py >> >> "Releases are made better together" >> > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] [Feedback] Error codes instead of errnos

, and changes to `compat-errno.{c.h}` are fine, I would like to hear about possibilities of a hackathon for getting the code-base walk through for changing errno to error code (and also possible new addition to error codes if it makes sense). Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposed Protocol changes for 4.0: Need feedback.

execution path for it further. Regards, Amar On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Nithya Balachandran <nbala...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 11 August 2017 at 18:04, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Below are the proposed protoco

[Gluster-devel] Metrics: and how to get them out from gluster

954.html (last email of the thread). [6] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/303 [7] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/304 [8] - https://github.com/Tendrl [9] - https://github.com/amarts/glustermetrics -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Rqelease 3.12.2 : Scheduled for the 10th of October

+1 Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop release cycle. On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" wrote: On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > >> [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ >> >> [1] :

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.13: Release notes (Please read and contribute)

Sorry, missed this earlier. On 20-Nov-2017 3:12 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" wrote: Hi, 3.13 RC0 is around the corner (possibly tomorrow). Towards this and the final 3.13.0 release, I was compiling the features that are a part of 3.13 and also attempted to write out the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Tests failing on Centos 7

> > In the meanwhile, we've run into a few road blocks. The following tests do >> not work on CentOS 7: >> >> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-1169302.t >> ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t >> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1260185-donot-allow-detach-commit- >> unnecessarily.t >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Tests failing on Centos 7

Thanks for bringing this out Nigel. I remember Atin asking for help here last week too. Meantime, can we file a bug for each this test and continue with marking this as known issue? I am happy to volunteer here (to file bug and send a patch to mark them known issue) While we work on it in

[Gluster-devel] regression tests taking time

Not sure if to believe it, just these 2 patches took 1hr30mins in regression. Is it expected? *21:08:30* ./tests/bugs/nfs/bug-1053579.t - 2683 second*21:08:30* ./tests/bugs/fuse/many-groups-for-acl.t - 2229 second Can someone check these out? -- Amar Tumballi (amarts

[Gluster-devel] Maintainers' meeting - Agenda : Meeting date: 11/29/2017

<https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both#decisions> Decisions - Add if any - Add your topic at https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) _

[Gluster-devel] Maintainers meeting minutes - Nov 29th 2017.

patches which are important for module, but the authors are not very active. -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Schedule and scope clarity (responses needed)

hing to help land the right set >> of features. >> >> Thanks, >> Shyam >> ___ >> maintainers mailing list >> maintain...@gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >> > > > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need help figuring out the reason for test failure

zf "${ARCHIVE_BASE}/${filename}" /var/log/glusterfs >>> /var/log/messages*;*11:41:14* echo "Logs archived in >>> http://${SERVER}/${filename}; >>> >>> >>> Could you help me find what the location could be? >>> -- >>> Pranith >>> >>

[Gluster-devel] Maintainers meeting minutes: 13th Dec, 2017

BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download: https://bluejeans.com/s/eTey Attendance - [Sorry Note] - Nigel - Amar - Atin - Nithya

Re: [Gluster-devel] Message id's for components

age > id's. > > Any feedback will be appreciated. > > Regards, > > Xavi > > [1] https://review.gluster.org/19029 > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org &

[Gluster-devel] Agenda for Nov 15th Maintainers meeting

inal authors. - Round Table: - <https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both#decisions> Decisions - Update link if you want to add anything: https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Ama

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Schedule and scope clarity (responses needed)

Thanks for this compilation. Response inline. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > As this is a longish mail, there are a few asks below, that I request > folks to focus and answer. > > 4.0 is a STM release (Short Term Maintenance), further,

[Gluster-devel] Maintainer's Meeting Minutes: Meeting date: 11/15/2017 (Nov 15th)

release branches: Ack - regression-test-burn-in on demand for release branches: (I think this was an Ack from Infra folks) - regression-test-burn-in for master moved to nightly (close to mid-day easter TZ): Ack -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] About GF_ASSERT() macro

__ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Gluster Summit Discussion: Time taken for regression tests

All, While we discussed many other things, we also discussed about reducing time taken for the regression jobs. As it stands now, it take around 5hr 40mins to complete a single run. There were many suggestions: - Run them in parallel (as each .t test is independent of each other) -

Re: [Gluster-devel] Coverity fixes

r >> (b) the commit message should exactly have the coverity description which >> is more neat. >> >> ( I was not knowing the fact the defect id are not constant and later on >> got to know this from Nigel today) >> >>> >>> > &g

  1   2   3   4   >