[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2020-03-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 Worker Ant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2019-05-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 Amar Tumballi changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|unspecified |low Status|ASSIGNED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2019-02-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 PnT Account Manager changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nig...@redhat.com |b...@gluster.org -- You are

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 --- Comment #9 from Prashanth Pai --- (In reply to Nigel Babu from comment #8) > Hey Prashanth, what's the status on this one? How ready are we to get a > nightly job running? It's okay to fail. We have nightly job on Centos CI running

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 --- Comment #7 from Nigel Babu --- Let's get the tests running in any case. I think it's better to have a nightly job that fails rather than nothing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-09-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 Prashanth Pai changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(p...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #6 from Prashanth Pai

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-07-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 Niels de Vos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nde...@redhat.com, |

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-07-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 --- Comment #4 from Prashanth Pai --- > I guess that is not an ideal thing to do. Either we have to keep the goal as > every release rebase Every release rebase would be ideal. > There will be no chance of knowing when we will have 'all

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-07-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 Amar Tumballi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||atumb...@redhat.com --- Comment #3

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-07-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 --- Comment #2 from Prashanth Pai --- > Is master of libgfapi-python compatible with master of glusterfs now? Most likely, no it's not. I'll try it out and confirm though. I'm waiting for all API changes in glusterfs to finish so that I can

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562670] Run libgfapi-python tests on Gerrit against glusterfs changes

2018-07-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562670 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nig...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from