https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757804
Worker Ant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757804
--- Comment #4 from M. Scherer ---
so maybe the problem is that since the code is using spinlock sometime (but not
always), and spinlock by nature would be a empty loop, then it might explain
for that specific case why it do run more often
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757804
--- Comment #3 from M. Scherer ---
We are using the RHEL 7 version (gcov), so yeah, that's indeed old. We could
switch to Fedora builders, but that would imply that the test suite is running
on Fedora and compile on it, even with a newer GCC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757804
--- Comment #2 from Yaniv Kaul ---
Amar was under the impression we are running an old version of whatever is
measuring the coverage. Could it be?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757804
M. Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msche...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from
