Re: [Gluster-infra] Switching from salt to ansible ?

Le mardi 05 janvier 2016 à 14:59 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > Another solution is to use ansible over salt > ( https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/12836 ), which mean we get the > benefit of both world. If we decide to switch, I would maybe start by > that until we can get a more

Re: [Gluster-infra] Switching from salt to ansible ?

Le lundi 04 janvier 2016 à 17:27 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit : > - salt in epel is still using a old version ( for dependencies reasons > ). While this is working well enough, it make contributing quite > difficult, and prevent using some new features that are needed. of course, the fun is

Re: [Gluster-infra] Switching from salt to ansible ?

Le mardi 05 janvier 2016 à 10:55 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > > - having a client/server model is something that caused trouble with > > puppet when they decided to support only 1 version of ruby (around the > >

Re: [Gluster-infra] Switching from salt to ansible ?

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:27:10PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> so over the holidays, I was pondering on moving to ansible from salt. >> >> So the reasons are numerous: >> >> - I am personally much more

Re: [Gluster-infra] Switching from salt to ansible ?

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Hi, > > so over the holidays, I was pondering on moving to ansible from salt. I'd like this as well, as I'm more familiar with Ansible as well. If switching to Ansible helps reduce the burden on you, I think we should