Deepshikha,
I see the failure here[1] which ran on builder206. So, we are good.
[1] https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/5901/consoleFull
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:23 AM Deepshikha Khandelwal
wrote:
> Sanju, can you please give us more info about the failures.
>
> I see the
Looks like is_nfs_export_available started failing again in recent
centos-regressions.
Michael, can you please check?
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:30 PM Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:15 PM Michael Scherer
> wrote:
>
>> Le lundi 22 avril 2019 à 22:57 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a
I took a quick look at the builders and noticed both have the same error of
'Cannot allocate memory' which comes up every time when the builder is
rebooted after a build abort. It is happening in the same pattern. Though
there's no such memory consumption on the builders.
I’m investigating more
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:38 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> builder204 needs to be fixed, too many failures, mostly none of the
> patches are passing regression.
>
And with that builder201 joins the pool,
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/5943/consoleFull
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at
builder204 needs to be fixed, too many failures, mostly none of the patches
are passing regression.
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:53 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:16 AM Sanju Rakonde wrote:
>
>> Deepshikha,
>>
>> I see the failure here[1] which ran on builder206. So, we
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:16 AM Sanju Rakonde wrote:
> Deepshikha,
>
> I see the failure here[1] which ran on builder206. So, we are good.
>
Not really,
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/5909/consoleFull failed on
builder204 for similar reasons I believe?
I am bit more worried on
Sanju, can you please give us more info about the failures.
I see the failures occurring on just one of the builder (builder206). I'm
taking it back offline for now.
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:42 PM Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mardi 07 mai 2019 à 20:04 +0530, Sanju Rakonde a écrit :
> > Looks
Le mardi 07 mai 2019 à 20:04 +0530, Sanju Rakonde a écrit :
> Looks like is_nfs_export_available started failing again in recent
> centos-regressions.
>
> Michael, can you please check?
I will try but I am leaving for vacation tonight, so if I find nothing,
until I leave, I guess Deepshika will
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:15 PM Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le lundi 22 avril 2019 à 22:57 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> > Is this back again? The recent patches are failing regression :-\ .
>
> So, on builder206, it took me a while to find that the issue is that
> nfs (the service) was
Mukherjee"
Cc: "Deepshikha Khandelwal" , "Gluster Devel"
, "Jiffin Thottan" ,
"gluster-infra"
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 7:44:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-infra] [Gluster-devel] is_nfs_export_available from
nfs.rc failing too often?
Le lundi 22 avril 2019
Le lundi 22 avril 2019 à 22:57 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> Is this back again? The recent patches are failing regression :-\ .
So, on builder206, it took me a while to find that the issue is that
nfs (the service) was running.
./tests/basic/afr/tarissue.t failed, because the nfs
Is this back again? The recent patches are failing regression :-\ .
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 19:26, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2019 à 16:30 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:56 AM Jiffin Thottan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
Le mercredi 03 avril 2019 à 16:30 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:56 AM Jiffin Thottan
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is_nfs_export_available is just a wrapper around "showmount"
> > command AFAIR.
> > I saw following messages in console output.
> > mount.nfs: rpc.statd
Le mercredi 03 avril 2019 à 15:12 +0300, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:53 PM Michael Scherer
> wrote:
>
> > Le mercredi 03 avril 2019 à 16:30 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:56 AM Jiffin Thottan <
> > > jthot...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:53 PM Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2019 à 16:30 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:56 AM Jiffin Thottan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > is_nfs_export_available is just a wrapper around "showmount"
> > > command AFAIR.
> >
Le mercredi 03 avril 2019 à 16:30 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:56 AM Jiffin Thottan
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is_nfs_export_available is just a wrapper around "showmount"
> > command AFAIR.
> > I saw following messages in console output.
> > mount.nfs: rpc.statd
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:56 AM Jiffin Thottan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is_nfs_export_available is just a wrapper around "showmount" command AFAIR.
> I saw following messages in console output.
> mount.nfs: rpc.statd is not running but is required for remote locking.
> 05:06:55 mount.nfs: Either use
Hi,
is_nfs_export_available is just a wrapper around "showmount" command AFAIR.
I saw following messages in console output.
mount.nfs: rpc.statd is not running but is required for remote locking.
05:06:55 mount.nfs: Either use '-o nolock' to keep locks local, or start statd.
05:06:55 mount.nfs:
18 matches
Mail list logo
