https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149
--- Comment #28 from Xavi Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aravinda VK from comment #27)
> I prefer Right(`AlignEscapedNewlines=Right`), since Patch will have minimum
> number of lines change on modification. For example,
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149
--- Comment #27 from Aravinda VK ---
(In reply to Xavi Hernandez from comment #19)
> I made a mistake on one of the proposed values:
>
> AlignEscapedNewLinesLeft=false
>
> What I wanted to propose was to set it to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149
--- Comment #25 from Xavi Hernandez ---
I don't want to start any battle. It was requested to create pull requests with
the proposed changes and that's what I've done. I've not hidden that some of
the changes are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149
--- Comment #23 from Xavi Hernandez ---
The change will also include some of the controversial options:
IndentCaseLabels=true
SpaceBeforeParens=ControlStatements
What should we do with them ?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149
--- Comment #22 from Xavi Hernandez ---
Some issues I've seen:
* Some initializations are formatted like this:
char gfid_local[GF_UUID_BUF_SIZE] = {
0,
};
I've tried to change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149
--- Comment #21 from Jeff Darcy ---
The feedback so far has been strongly positive, but one issue has been raised.
As Xavi mentioned, the PointerAlignment doesn't seem to work properly on lines
affected by AlignConsecutive*.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570161
--- Comment #1 from Amye Scavarda ---
Editing to add:
Archives are private, not that the list should be invisible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug