On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 9:30 AM Amar Tumballi wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Nithya Balachandran
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers'
>>> meeting.Should we still go
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 9:30 AM Amar Tumballi wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Nithya Balachandran
> wrote:
>
>> We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers'
>> meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that?
>>
>>
>>
> It would still be a good exercise, IMO. Reducing
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Nithya Balachandran
wrote:
> We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers'
> meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that?
>
>
>
It would still be a good exercise, IMO. Reducing it to 50-60 volumes from
120 now.
> On 9 July 2018 at 15:45, Xavi
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Nithya Balachandran
wrote:
> We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers'
> meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that?
>
I m not sure about exactly what was discussed. But reducing the number of
volumes may defeat the purpose of the test, as
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 5:41 PM Nithya Balachandran
wrote:
> We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers'
> meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that?
>
Do we know how much will it save us? There is value in some moderate number
of volumes (especially if we can ensure they
We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers'
meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that?
On 9 July 2018 at 15:45, Xavi Hernandez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Karthik Subrahmanya
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Deepshikha,
>>
>> Are you looking into this failure? I can still
Thanks for the patch Xavi :)
Regards,
Karthik
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:45 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Karthik Subrahmanya
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Deepshikha,
>>
>> Are you looking into this failure? I can still see this happening for all
>> the regression runs.
>>
>
>
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Karthik Subrahmanya
wrote:
> Hi Deepshikha,
>
> Are you looking into this failure? I can still see this happening for all
> the regression runs.
>
I've executed the failing script on my laptop and all tests finish
relatively fast. What seems to take time is the
Hi Deepshikha,
Are you looking into this failure? I can still see this happening for all
the regression runs.
Thanks & Regards,
Karthik
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 7:18 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
> https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-with-multiplex/794/display/redirect
> has the same
