On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 12:16, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 18:24 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 04 avril 2019 à 19:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
> > > I'm not convinced this is solved. Just had what I believe is a
> > > similar
> > > failure:
> > >
> > >
We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers'
meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that?
On 9 July 2018 at 15:45, Xavi Hernandez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Karthik Subrahmanya
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Deepshikha,
>>
>> Are you looking into this failure? I can still
On 19 February 2018 at 13:12, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As you all most likely know, we store the tarball of the binaries and
>> core if there's a core during regression. Occasionally,
I agree.
Regards,
Nithya
- Original Message -
> From: "Atin Mukherjee"
> To: "Joseph Fernandes" , "Avra Sengupta"
>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-infra"
>
> Sent:
- Original Message -
From: Avra Sengupta aseng...@redhat.com
To: Rajesh Joseph rjos...@redhat.com, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com
Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-de...@gluster.org, gluster-infra
gluster-infra@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 1:42:25 PM
Subject: Re: