[Gluster-users] Expand Replicated Storage Capacity?

2015-07-22 Thread Kevin Bridges
Apologies in advance if this question is as basic as it feels. I'm trying to understand options for expanding capacity on a volume of type Replicate. I've been reading http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.1:_Expanding_Volumes and

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand Replicated Storage Capacity?

2015-07-22 Thread Joe Julian
Assuming you're saying you have a 2 brick replica 2 volume, adding two more bricks will add distribution to your volume - making your volume a distribute-replica volume, increasing your storage capacity. On 07/22/2015 12:09 PM, Kevin Bridges wrote: Apologies in advance if this question is as

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand Replicated Storage Capacity?

2015-07-22 Thread Kevin Bridges
perfect .. Thank you On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org wrote: Assuming you're saying you have a 2 brick replica 2 volume, adding two more bricks will add distribution to your volume - making your volume a distribute-replica volume, increasing your storage

Re: [Gluster-users] Change transport-type on volume from tcp to rdma, tcp

2015-07-22 Thread Geoffrey Letessier
Hi Rafi, It’s what I do. But I note particularly this kind of trouble when I mount my volumes manually. In addition, when I changed my transport-type from tcp or rdma to tcp,rdma, I have had to restart my volume in order they can took effect. I wonder if these trouble are not due to RDMA

Re: [Gluster-users] Change transport-type on volume from tcp to rdma, tcp

2015-07-22 Thread Geoffrey Letessier
… And, after a moment (a few minutes after having restarted my back-transfert of around 40TB), my volume fall down (and all my rsync too): [root@atlas ~]# df -h /mnt df: « /mnt »: Noeud final de transport n'est pas connecté df: aucun système de fichiers traité aka transport endpoint is not

Re: [Gluster-users] Change transport-type on volume from tcp to rdma, tcp

2015-07-22 Thread Geoffrey Letessier
Oops, i forgot to add all people in CC. Yes, i guessed. With TCP protocol, all my volume seem OK and I dont note, for the moment, any hang. mount command: - with RDMA: mount -t glusterfs -o transport=rdma,direct-io-mode=disable,enable-ino32 ib-storage1:vol_home /mnt - with

Re: [Gluster-users] Change transport-type on volume from tcp to rdma, tcp

2015-07-22 Thread Mohammed Rafi K C
On 07/22/2015 12:55 PM, Geoffrey Letessier wrote: Concerning the hang, I just saw this only once with TCP protocol but, actually, RDMA seems to be in cause. If you are mounting a tcp,rdma volume using tcp protocol, all the communication will go through the tcp connection and rdma won't come

[Gluster-users] Minutes of today's Gluster Community Meeting (2015-07-22)

2015-07-22 Thread Atin Mukherjee
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-07-22/gluster-meeting.2015-07-22-12.02.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-07-22/gluster-meeting.2015-07-22-12.02.txt Log:

Re: [Gluster-users] Change transport-type on volume from tcp to rdma, tcp

2015-07-22 Thread Geoffrey Letessier
I can confirm your words… Everything looks like OK with TCP proto and more-or-less unstable with RDMA one. But TCP is slower than RDMA protocol…In attachments you can find my volume mount log, all brick logs and several information concerning my vol_shared volume.Thanks in advance,GeoffreyPS:

[Gluster-users] Split brain or what

2015-07-22 Thread Jesper Led Lauridsen TS Infra server
Hi, I have a wired situation. Is this as it should be? or what is going on # gluster --version glusterfs 3.6.2 built on Jan 22 2015 12:58:11 There are 8 files reported in split-brain (1024 times), but they seem to be identical. # gluster volume heal glu_rhevtst_dr2_data_01 info split-brain|