Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 09:50, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 09:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 09:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: > >> 13.07.2016 09:26, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: >> >> >> >>

Re: [Gluster-users] How to find out maximum supported op-version of glusterd in runtime

OK, so we already have this in glusterd's statedump. If you execute kill -SIGUSR1 $(pidof glusterd) you will get a glusterd statedump file with naming convention as glusterdump..dump. in /var/run/gluster. This file would contain glusterd.max-op-version value under [xlator.glusterd.priv] section.

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 09:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 09:26, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 09:26, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: > >> 13.07.2016 09:16, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: >> >> >> >>

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 09:26, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 09:16, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 09:16, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: > >> 13.07.2016 09:04, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: >> >> >> >>

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 09:19, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 09:09, Lindsay Mathieson пишет: On 13 July 2016 at 15:06, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 09:09, Lindsay Mathieson пишет: > >> On 13 July 2016 at 15:06, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: >> >>> zfs repairs deleted files? wow! :-D >>> >> >> File corruptions (if you have zfs raid configured),

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 09:16, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 09:04, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 09:04, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: > >> 13.07.2016 08:56, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: >> >> >> >>

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 09:09, Lindsay Mathieson пишет: On 13 July 2016 at 15:06, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: zfs repairs deleted files? wow! :-D File corruptions (if you have zfs raid configured), which I presumed you were referring to. There is only so much a system can do to protect users

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On 13 July 2016 at 15:06, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > zfs repairs deleted files? wow! :-D File corruptions (if you have zfs raid configured), which I presumed you were referring to. There is only so much a system can do to protect users against themselves, If you insist on

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 09:04, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 08:56, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 09:05, Lindsay Mathieson пишет: On 13 July 2016 at 14:50, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: Sorry, I'm talking not about direct data manipulation in bricks as way to use gluster, I'm talking about problems detection and recovery. As I already said- if I for some reason ( real

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On 13 July 2016 at 14:50, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > Sorry, I'm talking not about direct data manipulation in bricks as way to > use gluster, I'm talking about problems detection and recovery. > As I already said- if I for some reason ( real case can be only by accident > ) will

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 08:56, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: > >> 13.07.2016 08:46, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: >> >> >> >>

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 08:56, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 08:46, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 08:46, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: > >> 13.07.2016 08:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: >> >> >> >>

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 08:46, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 08:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 08:43, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 07:46, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 08:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: > >> 13.07.2016 01:52, Anuradha Talur пишет: >> >>> >>> -

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 07:46, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: > >> >> >> 12.07.2016 17:39, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: >> >>

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 08:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 13.07.2016 01:52, Anuradha Talur пишет: - Original Message - From: "Dmitry Melekhov"

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 13.07.2016 01:52, Anuradha Talur пишет: > >> >> - Original Message - >> >>> From: "Dmitry Melekhov" >>> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" >>> Cc: "gluster-users"

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain recovery automation, any plans?

13.07.2016 07:44, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 12.07.2016 17:38, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: Did you wait for heals to complete before upgrading second node? no... So

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 07:46, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 12.07.2016 17:39, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: Wow, what are the steps to recreate the problem? just set file length to

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain recovery automation, any plans?

13.07.2016 00:20, Darrell Budic пишет: FYI, it’s my experience that “yum upgrade” will stop the running glistered (and possibly the running glusterfsds) This is main point- looks like glusterfsds are not stopped by upgrade, not sure, though... Thank you!

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

13.07.2016 01:52, Anuradha Talur пишет: - Original Message - From: "Dmitry Melekhov" To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" Cc: "gluster-users" Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 9:27:17 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index

[Gluster-users] Deleting data on glusterfs replicate volume take more time.

Hi All, I have replicate gluster volume of 400gb, it has two bricks from two servers each has xfs fs of 400gb. i want to delete 200gb of data in the gluster volume, i started delete the data, its taking more time. even for delete 1gb of data. can you please guide me, any volume tunning option

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > > > 12.07.2016 17:39, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > Wow, what are the steps to recreate the problem? > > > just set file length to zero, always reproducible. > Changing things on the brick i.e. not from gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain recovery automation, any plans?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > > > 12.07.2016 17:38, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > Did you wait for heals to complete before upgrading second node? > > > no... > So basically if you have operations in progress on the mount, you should wait for

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-07-12 18:15 GMT+02:00, Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > > Will it be possible to get this profile output for a volume without > > sharding enabled? If it still doesn't look

Re: [Gluster-users] How to find out maximum supported op-version of glusterd in runtime

On Wednesday 13 July 2016, Pavel Malyshev wrote: > Hello! > > I use gluster for quite a long time and even survived a bunch of upgrades.. > Each time I upgrade, since "op-version" was introduced I scratch my head > and google a bit to find out which "op-version" should I

Re: [Gluster-users] performance.stat-prefetch

On 13 July 2016 at 01:27, David Gossage wrote: > Wondering what the effects of this are as I noticed I had it off while > others posting their sharding enabled settings seemed to have it on. > > Is this likely to cause issues? I've migrated a handful of dev VM's to >

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

- Original Message - > From: "Dmitry Melekhov" > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > Cc: "gluster-users" > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 9:27:17 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken? > > > >

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain recovery automation, any plans?

FYI, it’s my experience that “yum upgrade” will stop the running glistered (and possibly the running glusterfsds) during it’s installation of new gluster components. I’ve also noticed it starts them back up again during the process. Ie, yesterday I upgraded a system to 3.7.13: systemctl stop

[Gluster-users] How to find out maximum supported op-version of glusterd in runtime

Hello! I use gluster for quite a long time and even survived a bunch of upgrades.. Each time I upgrade, since "op-version" was introduced I scratch my head and google a bit to find out which "op-version" should I set to my cluster. I tried to convert current gluster package version to op-version,

Re: [Gluster-users] Data corruption when switching between shard on/off

2016-07-12 19:18 GMT+02:00, Joe Julian : > Good find. Please file a bug report. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=GlusterFS Done https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355846 This could lead to massive data corruption if someone try to disabled

Re: [Gluster-users] Data corruption when switching between shard on/off

Good find. Please file a bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=GlusterFS On 07/12/2016 10:14 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: i don't know if this is an expected behaviour but when switching "off" sharding from a volume that had shard enabled previously, sharded files

[Gluster-users] Data corruption when switching between shard on/off

i don't know if this is an expected behaviour but when switching "off" sharding from a volume that had shard enabled previously, sharded files are not more readable. Only the first shard is available, leading to massive data corruption. If this is an expected behaviour, removing sharding should

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

2016-07-12 18:15 GMT+02:00, Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > Will it be possible to get this profile output for a volume without > sharding enabled? If it still doesn't look like the one I gave in the mail > before then we have some debugging to do to find why there are extra >

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

Will it be possible to get this profile output for a volume without sharding enabled? If it still doesn't look like the one I gave in the mail before then we have some debugging to do to find why there are extra operations we are seeing. On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

12.07.2016 17:39, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: Wow, what are the steps to recreate the problem? just set file length to zero, always reproducible. On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 12.07.2016 13:33, Pranith Kumar

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain recovery automation, any plans?

12.07.2016 17:38, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: Did you wait for heals to complete before upgrading second node? no... On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 12.07.2016 13:31, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-07-12 14:06 GMT+02:00 Anuradha Talur : > > I realize I just repeated the same example in different words but I hope > this answers > > your questions. So do let us know if

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

Shard was enabled during this test that previously i did other tests with shard disabled and speed doesn't change at all. Il 12 lug 2016 5:17 PM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" ha scritto: > You got this for single dd workload? Ideally single file dd workload > should be

[Gluster-users] performance.stat-prefetch

Wondering what the effects of this are as I noticed I had it off while others posting their sharding enabled settings seemed to have it on. Is this likely to cause issues? I've migrated a handful of dev VM's to sharded storage and they seem to be running just fine so far. *David Gossage*

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

You got this for single dd workload? Ideally single file dd workload should be dominated by 'WRITE' operation, but seems like it is dominated by too many FINODELK, I see quite a few mknods too. What is puzzling is the number of ENTRYLKs which is of the order of 10k. I see some discussion about

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

2016-07-12 14:06 GMT+02:00 Anuradha Talur : > I realize I just repeated the same example in different words but I hope this > answers > your questions. So do let us know if something is not clear. Is unclear, probably because i don't understand how gluster works and because I

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

2016-07-12 15:55 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > Could you do the following? > > # gluster volume profile start > # run dd command > # gluster volume profile info > > /path/to/file/that/you/need/to/send/us.txt http://pastebin.com/raw/wcA0i335

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

Could you do the following? # gluster volume profile start # run dd command # gluster volume profile info > /path/to/file/that/you/need/to/send/us.txt On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-07-12 14:02 GMT+02:00 Gandalf

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

Wow, what are the steps to recreate the problem? On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 12.07.2016 13:33, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > What was "gluster volume heal info" showing when you saw this > issue? > > > just reproduced : > > > [root@father

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain recovery automation, any plans?

Did you wait for heals to complete before upgrading second node? On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 12.07.2016 13:31, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Dmitry Melekhov < > d...@belkam.com> wrote: >

[Gluster-users] Minutes from today's Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting (July 12 2016)

Hi, Thanks to everyone who joined the meeting. Please find the minutes of today's Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting at the below links. Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-07-12/gluster_bug_triage.2016-07-12-12.00.html Minutes (text):

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

- Original Message - > From: "Gandalf Corvotempesta" > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > Cc: "Anuradha Talur" , "gluster-users" > > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:32:57 PM > Subject: Re:

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

2016-07-12 13:36 GMT+02:00 David Gossage : > Did you try by chance running 3 transfers at once from one server to all 3 > nodes outside of gluster? Maybe bonding isn't picking alternate routes like > it would be expected. As wrote, currently i'm not using bonding but

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

2016-07-12 14:02 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta : > As wrote, currently i'm not using bonding but a single gigabit > connection and i'm still > unable to go over 1/4 of the theoretical speed. > > 1000/8/3 = 41MB/s > > I'm stuck at 10MB/s Just to clarify: any

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-07-11 19:31 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta > : > > Each disks on each node is able to saturate the network, so I would > > expect about 950mbit when writing in

[Gluster-users] REMINDER: Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting at 12:00 UTC (~in 30 minutes)

Hi all, This meeting is scheduled for anyone who is interested in learning more about, or assisting with the Bug Triage. Meeting details: - location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC (https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting ) - date: every Tuesday - time: 12:00 UTC

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

2016-07-12 12:56 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > For adding new bricks into a replica set you need each brick in the replica > set to be from different machine. So you can't add all bricks directly from > just one machine. So how do you get the extra bricks that can be

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-07-12 12:43 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > > True. But at the end of 4 replace-bricks, you have 4 bricks from earlier > > configuration which are empty now, which

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

2016-07-12 12:43 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > True. But at the end of 4 replace-bricks, you have 4 bricks from earlier > configuration which are empty now, which can be re-used. So essentially you > have 6 empty bricks which can be put back into use, but these can be

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-07-12 12:34 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > > If you add 6 new disks to the cluster by bringing in a new node with > replica > > count 3 you are essentially are

Re: [Gluster-users] ovirt read error

Yes, no problem. This is an export domain in ovirt: gluster v info export   Volume Name: export Type: Replicate Volume ID: 0b50341b-9c9a-4868-9c53-7f0ecdb44162 Status: Started Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: glusternode1:/tank2/export/brick1 Brick2:

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

2016-07-12 12:34 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > If you add 6 new disks to the cluster by bringing in a new node with replica > count 3 you are essentially are adding 2 replica sets. Since you can't have > replica sets with bricks from same node, we need to get empty

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

2016-07-11 19:31 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta : > Each disks on each node is able to saturate the network, so I would > expect about 950mbit when writing in parallel to 3 nodes. I'm reaching > 1/4 of available speed. I did more tests, even by transfering files

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

2016-07-12 11:49 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > Alternatively you can replace 4 selected bricks on the first 3 nodes with > the 4 disks on the new machine. Now you have 4 bricks that can be reused. > Form extra 2 replica sets with 3 bricks each and you are done. This

Re: [Gluster-users] ovirt read error

Frank, Could you share your volume configuration (`gluster volume info `)? -Krutika On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:44 PM, David Gossage wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Frank Rothenstein < > f.rothenst...@bodden-kliniken.de> wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> As

Re: [Gluster-users] ovirt read error

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Frank Rothenstein < f.rothenst...@bodden-kliniken.de> wrote: > Hi David, > > As I'm on gluster I use > > glusterfs.x86_64 3.7.12-2.el7 @centos-gluster37 > > I already tried to revert back to 3.7.11 but somehow this didn't help. > > Do you have more info on

Re: [Gluster-users] ovirt read error

Hi David, As I'm on gluster I use glusterfs.x86_64 3.7.12-2.el7 @centos-gluster37 I already tried to revert back to 3.7.11 but somehow this didn't help.  Do you have more info on aio/caching? FrankAm Dienstag, den 12.07.2016, 04:25 -0500 schrieb David Gossage: > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-07-12 9:46 GMT+02:00 Anuradha Talur : > > Yes you can add single node with 3 bricks. But, given that you are > keeping the replica count > > same, these three bricks will be

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

12.07.2016 13:33, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: What was "gluster volume heal info" showing when you saw this issue? just reproduced : [root@father brick]# > gstatus-0.64-3.el7.x86_64.rpm [root@father brick]# gluster volume heal pool Launching heal operation to perform index self heal on

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain recovery automation, any plans?

12.07.2016 13:31, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет: On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Dmitry Melekhov > wrote: 11.07.2016 12:47, Gandalf Corvotempesta пишет: 2016-07-11 9:54 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Melekhov

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?

What was "gluster volume heal info" showing when you saw this issue? On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > Hello! > > 3.7.13, 3 bricks volume. > > inside one of bricks: > > [root@father brick]# ls -l gstatus-0.64-3.el7.x86_64.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 2 root root

Re: [Gluster-users] split-brain recovery automation, any plans?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 11.07.2016 12:47, Gandalf Corvotempesta пишет: > >> 2016-07-11 9:54 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Melekhov : >> >>> We just got split-brain during update to 3.7.13 ;-) >>> >> This is an interesting point. >> Could you

Re: [Gluster-users] ovirt read error

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Frank Rothenstein < f.rothenst...@bodden-kliniken.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am stuck with a strange problem using ovirt/gluster on ZFSonLinux. > > I detached a data-volume form my Cluster an reimported it to change > from POSIX-type/glusterfs to

[Gluster-users] ovirt read error

Hi all, I am stuck with a strange problem using ovirt/gluster on ZFSonLinux. I detached a data-volume form my Cluster an reimported it to change from POSIX-type/glusterfs to GlusterFS-Storage. When I try to attach it to the Cluster I always get a Sanlock error. I checked the logs and what I

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

2016-07-12 9:46 GMT+02:00 Anuradha Talur : > Yes you can add single node with 3 bricks. But, given that you are keeping > the replica count > same, these three bricks will be replica of each other. It is not so useful > in case of node > failures/shutdown. So, the only way to

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

- Original Message - > From: "Anuradha Talur" > To: "Gandalf Corvotempesta" > Cc: "gluster-users" > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:16:00 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated

Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated volume

- Original Message - > From: "Gandalf Corvotempesta" > To: "Anuradha Talur" > Cc: "gluster-users" > Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 10:14:46 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expand distributed replicated