Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS on FreeBSD

BTW, here's the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356076 On 07/14/2016 08:28 PM, Angelo Rivera wrote: Hello, Thank you very much for your response this really is a big help on my side, since I'm only starting to study glusterfs on freebsd. I'm running 4 FreeBSD 10.2 server

Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS on FreeBSD

Hello, Thank you very much for your response this really is a big help on my side, since I'm only starting to study glusterfs on freebsd. I'm running 4 FreeBSD 10.2 server with 50GB space each. On 14/07/2016 1:33 PM, Kyle Johnson wrote: Installed, yes. Properly? Kind of. I'm running

Re: [Gluster-users] Split brain issue with non-existent file

On 07/15/2016 02:24 AM, Rob Janney wrote: I have a 2 node cluster that reports a single file as split brained .. but the file itself doesn't exist on either node. What is the version of gluster you are running? I did not find this scenario in the split brain docs, but based on other

[Gluster-users] Split brain issue with non-existent file

I have a 2 node cluster that reports a single file as split brained .. but the file itself doesn't exist on either node. I did not find this scenario in the split brain docs, but based on other scenarios I deleted the gfid file and then ran a full heal, however; it still complains about split

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

Eventi with limited bandwidth should i reach at least 1gbit In my case I'm not going over 480mbit Il 14 lug 2016 5:36 PM, "Alastair Neil" ha scritto: > I am not sure if your nics support it but you could try balance-alb > (bonding mode 6), this does not require special

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

I am not sure if your nics support it but you could try balance-alb (bonding mode 6), this does not require special switch support and I have had good results with it. As Lindsey said the switch configuration could be limiting the bandwidth between nodes in balance-rr. On 14 July 2016 at 05:21,

[Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.2.7-1 requires

Hello, I will be needing below version of Glusterfs packages. glusterfs-3.2.7-1.el6.x86_64 glusterfs-server-3.2.7-1.el6.x86_64 glusterfs-fuse-3.2.7-1.el6.x86_64 I had searched a lot but unable to find this packages, please help me out with the download link of this packages. Thanks & Regards

Re: [Gluster-users] Reduce informational logging

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: > Hi David, > > As you have mentioned already, the issue is fixed already and > the patch is here[1]. It is also back ported to 3.8 and 3.7.12. > > [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13793/ > Good news. Sadly

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

2016-07-14 11:19 GMT+02:00, Gandalf Corvotempesta : > Yes, but my iperf test was made with a wrong bonding configuration. Anyway, even with direct NFS mount (not involving gluster) i'm stuck as 60MB/s (480mbit/s) about 50% of available bandwidth with a single

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

2016-07-14 9:44 GMT+02:00, Lindsay Mathieson : > Depends a lot on the switch and the modes chose (something about mode > 0 and striping: > > http://serverfault.com/questions/26720/how-to-achieve-2-gigabit-total-throughput-on-linux-using-the-bonding-driver?rq=1 Ports

Re: [Gluster-users] Reduce informational logging

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:07 AM, David Gossage wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh < > mselv...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> Which version are you using. Though the error seems superfluous, do you >> observe any functional

Re: [Gluster-users] Reduce informational logging

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: > Hi David, > > Which version are you using. Though the error seems superfluous, do you > observe any functional failures. > 3.7.11 and no so far I have noticed no issues over past week as I have been enabling

Re: [Gluster-users] Reduce informational logging

Hi David, Which version are you using. Though the error seems superfluous, do you observe any functional failures. Also, there are quite some EINVAL bugs we fixed in 3.8, could you point out to the one you find matching. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:51 PM, David Gossage

Re: [Gluster-users] Reduce informational logging

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, David Gossage < > dgoss...@carouselchecks.com> wrote: > >> M, David Gossage wrote: >> >>> Is their a way to reduce logging of informational spam? >>>

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Events API - Help required to identify the list of Events from each component

+gluster-users regards Aravinda On 07/13/2016 09:03 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 07/13/2016 10:23 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, We are working on Eventing feature for Gluster, Sent feature patch for the same. Design: http://review.gluster.org/13115 Patch: http://review.gluster.org/14248 Demo:

Re: [Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience

On 14 July 2016 at 00:40, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > That's not true. > from the kernel docs: > > "balance-rr: This mode is the only mode that will permit a single TCP/IP > connection to stripe traffic across multiple interfaces. It is therefore the > only