Re: [Gluster-users] Teaming vs Bond?

Hi, In general and not in Gluster. we used Teaming for some time and we switched back to Bonding because we had issues with the load balancing of Teaming. With teaming config was "LACP, eth,ipv4,ipv6" the results was one interface utilized more then the other one, and in some cases one

[Gluster-users] Cloud storage with glusterfs

Hello everybody I have 3 datacenters in different regions, Can I deploy my own cloud storage with the help of glusterfs on the physical nodes?If I can, what are the differences between cloud storage glusterfs and local gluster storage? thx for your attention :)

Re: [Gluster-users] Teaming vs Bond?

I finally did find some stats on teaming http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/ On 6/19/2017 10:42 AM, WK wrote: OK, at least its not an *issue* with Gluster. I didn't expect any but you never know. I have been amused at the 'lack' of discussion on Teaming performance found

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing

Hi, I have tried on my host by setting corresponding ports, but I didn't see the issue on my machine locally. However with the logs you have sent it is prety much clear issue is related to ports only. I will trying to reproduce on some other machine. Will update you as s0on as possible. Thanks

Re: [Gluster-users] Debian 3.8.12 packages have been updated?

On 18/06/2017 12:47 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: I installed 3.8.12 a while back and the packages seem to have been updated since (2017-06-13), prompting me for updates. I haven't seen any release announcements or notes on this though. Bump - new versions are 3.8.12-2. Just curious as to

Re: [Gluster-users] Teaming vs Bond?

OK, at least its not an *issue* with Gluster. I didn't expect any but you never know. I have been amused at the 'lack' of discussion on Teaming performance found on Google searches. There are lots of 'here it is and here is how to set it up' articles/posts, but no 'ooh-wee-wow it is

Re: [Gluster-users] Extremely slow du

Hi Vijay Thanks, is it straight forward to upgrade from 2.8 to 2.11 on a production system? I have around 300 TB data and approximately 60-80 million files. Is there any other optimisation which I can try at the same time? Thanks Kashif On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Vijay Bellur

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster Documentation Feedback

Gentle reminder ... On 15 June 2017 at 10:43, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > Hi, > > We are looking at improving our documentation ( > http://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) and would like your feedback. > > Please let us know what would make the documentation more useful

Re: [Gluster-users] total outage - almost

Hi, I just remembered that I posted once a bug at redhat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434000 could this be the same problem? but this time it's not a few files but hundreds of thousands BTW: I tried to disable bitrot but it didn't help Best Regards Bernhard 2017-06-19

Re: [Gluster-users] total outage - almost

Hi, I checked the attributes of one of the files with I/O errors root@chastcvtprd04:~# getfattr -d -e hex -m - /data/glusterfs/Server_Standard/1I-1-14/brick/Server_Standard/CV_MAGNETIC/V_1050932/CHUNK_11126559/SFILE_CONTAINER_014 getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:

Re: [Gluster-users] different brick using the same port?

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > Isn't this just brick multiplexing? > I initially thought about it but with brick multiplexing the pid should be the same which is not the case here. > > > On June 19, 2017 5:55:54 AM PDT, Atin Mukherjee

[Gluster-users] total outage - almost

Hi, we use a bunch of replicated gluster volumes as a backend for our backup. Yesterday I noticed that some synthetic backups failed because of I/O errors. Today I ran "find /gluster_vol -type f | xargs md5sum" and got loads of I/O errors. The brick log file shows the below errors [2017-06-19

Re: [Gluster-users] different brick using the same port?

Isn't this just brick multiplexing? On June 19, 2017 5:55:54 AM PDT, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Yong Zhang wrote: > >> Hi, all >> >> >> >> I found two of my bricks from different volumes are using the same >port >> 49154 on

Re: [Gluster-users] Teaming vs Bond?

I haven't done any testing of performance differences, but on my oVirt/rhev i use standard bonding as that's that it supports. On the stand along gluster nodes I use teaming for bonding. Teaming may be slightly easier to manage, but not by much if you are already used to bond setups. I haven't

Re: [Gluster-users] different brick using the same port?

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Yong Zhang wrote: > Hi, all > > > > I found two of my bricks from different volumes are using the same port > 49154 on the same glusterfs server node, is this normal? > No it's not. Can you please help me with the following information: 1.

Re: [Gluster-users] emptying the trash directory

On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 16:15 -0400, Ludwig Gamache wrote: > All, > > I just enabled the trashcan feature on our volumes. It is working as > expected. However, I can't > seem to find the rules to empty the trashcan. Is there any automated process > to do that? No such policies have been