Re: [Gluster-users] Wrong volume size with df

Hey, Sorry for the late reply. Why have you provided the same bricks for replica and disperse volume? -- Ashish - Original Message - From: "Tom Fite" To: gluster-users@gluster.org Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:21:24 AM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Wrong

Re: [Gluster-users] Wrong volume size with df

I'm also having this issue with a volume before and after I broke from a arbiter volume down to a single distribute, and rebuilt to arbiter On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Tom Fite wrote: > For what it's worth here, after I added a hot tier to the pool, the brick > sizes are

Re: [Gluster-users] A Problem of readdir-optimize

>From Karan: > We had a similar issue when we were certifying gluster + milestone. But the issue got resolved when we disabled readdir-ahead. Looks like the >issue is in readdir code path. Paul, can you try turning off performance.readdir-ahead and see if the issue persists? On 29 December

Re: [Gluster-users] So how badly will Gluster be affected by the Intel 'fix'

On 01/04/2018 12:58 PM, WK wrote: > I'm reading that the new kernel will slow down context switches. That is > of course a big deal with FUSE mounts. > > Has anybody installed the new kernels yet and observed any performance > degradation? We are in the process of testing the same out. Hopefully

[Gluster-users] So how badly will Gluster be affected by the Intel 'fix'

I'm reading that the new kernel will slow down context switches. That is of course a big deal with FUSE mounts. Has anybody installed the new kernels yet and observed any performance degradation? -wk ___ Gluster-users mailing list