Hi,
I wonder how this procedure works. I could add a bug that I think is a
*blocker*, but there might not be consensus.
Cheers,
Hans Henrik
On 11-01-2018 07:02, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's time to prepare the 3.12.5 release, which falls on the 10th of
> each month, and hence
Hi,
It's time to prepare the 3.12.5 release, which falls on the 10th of
each month, and hence would be 12-01-2018 this time around.
This mail is to call out the following,
1) Are there any pending *blocker* bugs that need to be tracked for
3.12.5? If so mark them against the provided tracker
+gluster-devel
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Omar Kohl"
> Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:47:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Exact purpose of network.ping-timeout
>
>
>
Hi Jose,
Gluster is working as expected. The Distribute-replicated type just means
that there are now 2 replica sets and files will be distributed across
them.
A volume of type Replicate (1xn where n is the number of bricks in the
replica set) indicates there is no distribution (all files on
Hi Nithya
This is what i have so far, I have peer both cluster nodes together as replica,
from node 1A and 1B , now when i tried to add it , i get the error that it is
already part of a volume. when i run the cluster volume info , i see that has
switch to distributed-replica.
Thanks
Jose
I should add that additional testing has shown that only accessing files is
held up, IO is not interrupted for existing transfers. I think this points
to the heat metadata in the sqlite DB for the tier, is it possible that a
table is temporarily locked while the promotion daemon runs so the calls
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 06:21:26PM -0600, Darrell Budic wrote:
> Hey Niels,
>
> Installed 3.12.4 from centos-gluster312-test on my dev ovirt hyper
> converged cluster. Everything looks good and is working as expected
> for storage, migration, & healing. Need any specifics?
Thanks Darrell!
Sorry