Hi,
I'm posting this again as it got bounced.
Keep in mind that corosync/pacemaker is hard for proper setup by new
admins/users.
I'm still trying to remediate the effects of poor configuration at work.
Also, storhaug is nice for hyperconverged setups where the host is not only
hosting bricks,
IMO, you should keep storhaug and maintain it. At the beginning, we were with
pacemaker and corosync. Then we move to storhaug with the upgrade to gluster
4.1.x. Now you are talking about going back like it was. Maybe it will be
better with pacemake and corosync but the important is to have a
+1!
I'm using nfs-ganesha in my next upgrade so my client systems can use NFS
instead of fuse mounts. Having an integrated, designed in process to coordinate
multiple nodes into an HA cluster will very welcome.
On April 30, 2019 3:20:11 AM EDT, Jiffin Tony Thottan
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Some of
Hi all,
Some of you folks may be familiar with HA solution provided for
nfs-ganesha by gluster using pacemaker and corosync.
That feature was removed in glusterfs 3.10 in favour for common HA
project "Storhaug". Even Storhaug was not progressed
much from last two years and current
