Re: [Gluster-users] Upgrade 5.3 -> 5.4 on debian: public IP is used instead of LAN IP

Just to update everyone on the nasty crash one of our servers continued having even after 5.5/5.6, I posted a summary of the results here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690769#c4. Sincerely, Artem -- Founder, Android Police , APK Mirror

Re: [Gluster-users] Thin-arbiter questions

OK, thank you Ashish. On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 14:43, Ashish Pandey wrote: > David, > > I am adding members who are working on glusterd2 (Aravinda) and > thin-arbiter support in glusterd (Vishal) and who can > better reply on these questions. > > Patch for glusterd has been sent and it only

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposing to previous ganesha HA clustersolution back to gluster code as gluster-7 feature

On 30/04/19 6:59 PM, Strahil Nikolov wrote: Hi, I'm posting this again as it got bounced. Keep in mind that corosync/pacemaker  is hard for proper setup by new admins/users. I'm still trying to remediate the effects of poor configuration at work. Also, storhaug is nice for hyperconverged

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposing to previous ganesha HA cluster solution back to gluster code as gluster-7 feature

On 30/04/19 6:41 PM, Renaud Fortier wrote: IMO, you should keep storhaug and maintain it. At the beginning, we were with pacemaker and corosync. Then we move to storhaug with the upgrade to gluster 4.1.x. Now you are talking about going back like it was. Maybe it will be better with