glusterd on each node. Luckily I only
have four servers! Hoping I don't have to do this every time I reboot!
Regards,
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 5:23 PM Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com
<mailto:amukh...@redhat.com> > wrote:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 at 19:29, Jo Goossens <jo.gooss...@hosted-p
g port is advertised
To:Jo Goossens <jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com>;
CC:gluster-users@gluster.org;
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 at 02:36, Jo Goossens <jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com
<mailto:jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com> > wrote:
Hello Atin,
I just read it and very happy you found t
edump and the file will be available
> in /var/run/gluster
> 2. glusterd, brick logfile for 192.168.140.43:/gluster/public from
> 192.168.140.43
> 3. cmd_history logfile from all the nodes.
> 4. Content of /var/lib/glusterd/vols/public/
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at
it starts advertising a completely wrong port after
stop/start.
Regards
Jo Goossens
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
it starts advertising a completely wrong port after
stop/start.
Regards
Jo Goossens
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
llur <vbel...@redhat.com>
Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 18:16
Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
To:Jo Goossens <jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com>;
CC:gluster-users@gluster.org; Joe Julian <j...@julianfamily.org>;
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at
m>;
CC:gluster-users@gluster.org; Joe Julian <j...@julianfamily.org>;
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Jo Goossens <jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com
<mailto:jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com> > wrote:
Hello Joe,
I just did a mount like this (added the bold):
mount -t
bel...@redhat.com>
Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 18:16
Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
To:Jo Goossens <jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com>;
CC:gluster-users@gluster.org; Joe Julian <j...@julianfamily.org>;
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Jo
ossens <jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com>; gluster-users@gluster.org;
On 07/11/2017 08:14 AM, Jo Goossens wrote:
Hello Joe,
I really appreciate your feedback, but I already tried the opcache stuff (to
not valildate at all). It improves of course then, but not completely somehow.
Hi,
I also noticed disappearing of files with the combination of certain settings.
If you use cluster.readdir-optimize but not some of the other settings, they
don't disappear.
Unfortunately can't remember which setting was conflicting...
Performance wise I don't see difference
said, you might also look at these mount options: attribute-timeout,
entry-timeout, negative-timeout (set to some large amount of time), and
fopen-keep-cache.
On 07/11/2017 07:48 AM, Jo Goossens wrote:
Hello,
Here is the volume info as requested by soumya:
#gluster
a lot of complexity which we wouldn't need at all in our
> setup, could you please explain what is going on here? Is NFS the only
> solution to get acceptable performance? Did I miss one crucial settting
> perhaps?
>
>
>
> We're really desperate, thanks a lot for your help!
sens <jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com>; gluster-users@gluster.org;
CC:Ambarish Soman <aso...@redhat.com>; Karan Sandha <ksan...@redhat.com>;
+ Ambarish
On 07/11/2017 02:31 PM, Jo Goossens wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> We tried tons of settings to get a php app ru
ect:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
To:Jo Goossens <jo.gooss...@hosted-power.com>; gluster-users@gluster.org;
CC:Ambarish Soman <aso...@redhat.com>; Karan Sandha <ksan...@redhat.com>;
+ Ambarish
On 07/11/2017 02:31 PM, Jo Goossens wrote:
not used with nfs.
Kind regards
Jo Goossens
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
15 matches
Mail list logo
