Hi,
>>Once the write response is unwound, kernel issues a FLUSH. So, this is a
>>valid sequence of operations and nothing wrong.
I think I need to explain more of my meaning.
I added test log into wb_process_queue() etc, found the 4 logs as bellow.
I mean normally the log order should be
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:44 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:35 AM Li, Deqian (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <
> deqian...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you help to check this coredump?
>>
>> We are using glusterfs 3.12-3(3 replicated bricks solution ) to
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:35 AM Li, Deqian (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <
deqian...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Could you help to check this coredump?
>
> We are using glusterfs 3.12-3(3 replicated bricks solution ) to do
> stability testing under high CPU load like 80% by stress and doing I/O.
Hi,
Yes, thanks very much for your quick response.
I attach the whole file, not very big.
Br,
Li Deqian
From: Raghavendra Gowdappa
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 11:00 AM
To: Li, Deqian (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
Cc: gluster-users
Subject: Re: query about glusterfs 3.12-3 write-behind.c
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:35 AM Li, Deqian (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <
deqian...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Could you help to check this coredump?
>
> We are using glusterfs 3.12-3(3 replicated bricks solution ) to do
> stability testing under high CPU load like 80% by stress and doing I/O.
Hi,
Could you help to check this coredump?
We are using glusterfs 3.12-3(3 replicated bricks solution ) to do stability
testing under high CPU load like 80% by stress and doing I/O.
After several hours, coredump happened in glusterfs side .
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x737d2700 (LWP
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:11 PM Zhou, Cynthia (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <
cynthia.z...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using glusterfs version 3.12 for 3 brick I find that occasionally
> after reboot all 3 sn nodes simultaneously, the glusterd process on one sn
> nodes may get stuck, when you
Hi,
We are using glusterfs version 3.12 for 3 brick I find that occasionally after
reboot all 3 sn nodes simultaneously, the glusterd process on one sn nodes may
get stuck, when you try to execute glusterd command it does not response.
Following is the glusterd stuck log and the gdb info of the
Hi all, got a technical query from the proxmox list.
I upgraded to the latest proxmox (no-subscription repo) last night and
ran into an issue with online migration failing for VM's hosted on
gluster (gfapi). Fuse mounts are ok.
This is with Gluster 3.8.4, the proxmox devs were wanting to know if
On 17/06/16 18:01, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
Hi,
I am using Gluster 3.7.6 and performing plug in plug out of the board
but getting following brick logs after plug in board again:
[2016-06-17 07:14:36.122421] W [trash.c:1858:trash_mkdir]
0-c_glusterfs-trash: mkdir issued on /.trashcan/,
Hi,
I am using Gluster 3.7.6 and performing plug in plug out of the board but
getting following brick logs after plug in board again:
[2016-06-17 07:14:36.122421] W [trash.c:1858:trash_mkdir]
0-c_glusterfs-trash: mkdir issued on /.trashcan/, which is not permitted
[2016-06-17 07:14:36.122487] E
Hi
What will happen if we format the volume where the bricks of replicate
gluster volume's are created and restart the glusterd on both node.
It will work fine or in this case need to remove /var/lib/glusterd
directory as well.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
Hi
Any body have the idea that the time taken by self-heal-daemon process to
complete depend on which factor?
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
On 07/18/2013 12:43 PM, Rahul51 S wrote:
I am trying to peer probe a node, connected by a switch on the local
area network, but the command is failing with the return code 146.
/root gluster peer probe 172.24.132.1
/root echo $?
146
The gluster peer status on both the nodes give different
Hi All,
I am trying to peer probe a node, connected by a switch on the local
area network, but the command is failing with the return code 146.
/root gluster peer probe 172.24.132.1
/root echo $?
146
The gluster peer status on both the nodes give different outputs.
The below output is from
On 08/24/2012 02:07 PM, Jules Wang wrote:
hi, jack
As far as I know, the gmc project is deprecated. And redhat plans
to use its own product to cover this area.
Yes, gmc is deprecated. We are working with oVirt to provide GUI based
gluster configuration capabilities. oVirt 3.1 which was
...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Vijay Bellur
Sent: 24 August 2012 09:43
To: Jules Wang
Cc: gluster-users
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Query for web GUI for gluster configuration
On 08/24/2012 02:07 PM, Jules Wang wrote:
hi, jack
As far as I know, the gmc project is deprecated. And redhat plans
It's only far from good for certain use cases, not all. I'm actually
quite pleased that GlusterFS emphasizes C P over A and none of my
users complain ( I use raw images for 14 kvm vms on one of my GlusterFS
volumes ). Those VMs mount GlusterFS volumes for their application data.
Very little
@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Query for web GUI for gluster configuration
It's only far from good for certain use cases, not all. I'm actually quite
pleased that GlusterFS emphasizes C P over A and none of my users complain (
I use raw images for 14 kvm vms on one of my GlusterFS volumes
2012 10:08
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Query for web GUI for gluster configuration
It's only far from good for certain use cases, not all. I'm actually quite
pleased that GlusterFS emphasizes C P over A and none of my users complain ( I use raw
images for 14 kvm vms
it or not, and they
acknowledge it already.
Fernando
-Original Message-
From: Joe Julian [mailto:j...@julianfamily.org]
Sent: 24 August 2012 10:35
To: Fernando Frediani (Qube)
Cc: 'gluster-users@gluster.org'
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Query for web GUI for gluster configuration
My images are, indeed
] On Behalf Of Joe Julian
Sent: 24 August 2012 10:08
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Query for web GUI for gluster
configuration
It's only far from good for certain use cases, not all. I'm actually quite
pleased that GlusterFS emphasizes C P over A and none of my users
ng' <lancelo...@163.com> CC: 'gluster-users' <gluster-users@gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Query for web GUI for gluster configurationVijay, how are you planning to integrate Gluster with oVirt (a fantastic idea in my opinion) if the performance when running .qcow2 or even .ra
Hi list,
Could anyone recommend good web GUI to configure glusterfs? I
remenber long time ago when gluster not accuire by RH, there is a
simple GUI, seem that is not update now.
Thanks.
Jack
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
