Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

I was able to get the docker containers I'm using to test with to install the latest builds from gluster.org. So client/server versions are both 3.13.2 I am testing two main cases, both using sqlite3. With a php program wrapping all database operations with an flock(), it now works as expected.

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Paul Anderson wrote: > >> Raghavendra, >> >> I've commited my tests case to https://github.com/powool/gluster.git - >> it's grungy, and a work in progress,

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Paul Anderson wrote: > Raghavendra, > > I've commited my tests case to https://github.com/powool/gluster.git - > it's grungy, and a work in progress, but I am happy to take change > suggestions, especially if it will save folks significant time. >

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Raghavendra, I've commited my tests case to https://github.com/powool/gluster.git - it's grungy, and a work in progress, but I am happy to take change suggestions, especially if it will save folks significant time. For the rest, I'll reply inline below... On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:39 PM,

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

On 2018-03-06, Amar Tumballi wrote: >> If anyone would like our test scripts, I can either tar them up and >> email them or put them in github - either is fine with me. (they rely >> on current builds of docker and docker-compose) >> >> > Sure, sharing the test cases makes it

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Adding csaba On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > +Csaba. > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Paul Anderson wrote: > >> Raghavendra, >> >> Thanks very much for your reply. >> >> I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

+Csaba. On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Paul Anderson wrote: > Raghavendra, > > Thanks very much for your reply. > > I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the volume > performance.write-behind flag as you suggested, and simultaneously > disabling caching in my client

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Tough to do. Like in my case where you would have to install and use Plex. On March 5, 2018 4:19:23 PM PST, Amar Tumballi wrote: >> >> >> If anyone would like our test scripts, I can either tar them up and >> email them or put them in github - either is fine with me. (they

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

> > > If anyone would like our test scripts, I can either tar them up and > email them or put them in github - either is fine with me. (they rely > on current builds of docker and docker-compose) > > Sure, sharing the test cases makes it very easy for us to see what would be the issue. I would

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Raghavendra, Thanks very much for your reply. I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the volume performance.write-behind flag as you suggested, and simultaneously disabling caching in my client side mount command. In very modest testing, the flock() case appears to me to work well -

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Paul Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > tl;dr summary of below: flock() works, but what does it take to make > sync()/fsync() work in a 3 node GFS cluster? > > I am under the impression that POSIX flock, POSIX > fcntl(F_SETLK/F_GETLK,...), and POSIX

[Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Hi, tl;dr summary of below: flock() works, but what does it take to make sync()/fsync() work in a 3 node GFS cluster? I am under the impression that POSIX flock, POSIX fcntl(F_SETLK/F_GETLK,...), and POSIX read/write/sync/fsync are all supported in cluster operations, such that in theory,