<ondrej.valou...@s3group.com<mailto:ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>>
Cc: Andreas Ericsson
<andreas.erics...@findity.com<mailto:andreas.erics...@findity.com>>;
Gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance
arampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:10 AM
>>
>> *To:* Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
>> *Cc:* Andreas Ericsson <andreas.erics...@findity.com>;
>> Gluster-users@gluster.org
>> *Subject:*
.
From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:andreas.erics...@findity.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 10:43 AM
To: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com>
Cc: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>; Gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for W
ousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
> *Cc:* Andreas Ericsson <andreas.erics...@findity.com>;
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek &l
That seems unlikely. I pre-create the directory layout and then write to
directories I know exist.
I don't quite understand how any settings at all can reduce performance to
1/5000 of what I get when writing straight to ramdisk though, and
especially when running on a single node instead of in a
I no longer have the volume lying around. The most interesting one was a
2GB volume created on ramdisk for a single node. If I can't get that to go
faster than 3MB/sec for writes, I figured I wouldn't bother further.
I was using gluster fuse fs 3.10.7. Everything was running on ubuntu 16.04
lou...@s3group.com>
Cc: Andreas Ericsson <andreas.erics...@findity.com>; Gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Ondrej Valousek
<ondrej.valou...@s3group.com<mailto:ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>>
ndrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
> *Cc:* Andreas Ericsson <andreas.erics...@findity.com>;
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 P
performance
Ondrej
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:10 AM
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
Cc: Andreas Ericsson <andreas.erics...@findity.com>; Gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performa
eas Ericsson <andreas.erics...@findity.com>; Gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek
<ondrej.valou...@s3group.com<mailto:ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Gluster wil
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
> ondrej.valou...@s3group.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gluster will never perform well for small files.
>>
>> I believe there is nothing you can do with
Hi,
Can you send us the following details:
1. gluster volume info
2. What client you are using to run this?
Thanks,
Nithya
On 12 March 2018 at 18:16, Andreas Ericsson
wrote:
> Heya fellas.
>
> I've been struggling quite a lot to get glusterfs to perform even
>
Hi,
Gluster will never perform well for small files.
I believe there is nothing you can do with this.
Ondrej
From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org
[mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Ericsson
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 1:47 PM
To: Gluster-users@gluster.org
13 matches
Mail list logo