Il 17/12/2023 14:52, Joe Julian ha scritto:
From what I've been told (by experts) it's really hard to make it happen. More
if proper redundancy of MON and MDS daemons is implemented on quality HW.
LSI isn't exactly crap hardware. But when a flaw causes it to drop drives under
heavy load, the
On December 17, 2023 5:40:52 AM PST, Diego Zuccato
wrote:
>Il 14/12/2023 16:08, Joe Julian ha scritto:
>
>> With ceph, if the placement database is corrupted, all your data is lost
>> (happened to my employer, once, losing 5PB of customer data).
>
>From what I've been told (by experts) it's
Il 14/12/2023 16:08, Joe Julian ha scritto:
With ceph, if the placement database is corrupted, all your data is lost
(happened to my employer, once, losing 5PB of customer data).
From what I've been told (by experts) it's really hard to make it
happen. More if proper redundancy of MON and
Thanks for you feedback!
Please, do not get me wrong, I really like gluster
and it has served us well for many, many years.
But as from previous posts about gluster project health
this worries me and I want to be able to have a good
alternative prepared in case of
Gluster is great and aligns
Big raid isn't great as bricks. If the array does fail, the larger brick means
much longer heal times.
My main question I ask when evaluating storage solutions is, "what happens when
it fails?"
With ceph, if the placement database is corrupted, all your data is lost
(happened to my employer,
On 2023-12-14 07:48, Marcus Pedersén wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking in to ceph and cephfs and in my
head I am comparing with gluster.
The way I have been running gluster over the years
is either a replicated or replicated-distributed clusters.
Here are my observations but I am far from an expert
14.12.2023 16:48, Marcus Pedersén пишет:
The problem is that I can not get my head around how
to think when disaster strikes.
So one fileserver burns up, there is still the other
fileserver and from my understanding the ceph system
will start to replicate the files on the same fileserver
no,
